Redout 2 Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-04-13
  • Highly enjoyable and fun gameplay
  • Impressive visuals and audio
  • Responsive and smooth controls
  • Track design issues
  • Lack of track variety
  • Frequent crashes and errors
Redout 2 header

Emotions

Archetypes

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

  • -

    No data available

Review evidence

Why players say this

What players like

Highly enjoyable and fun gameplay: Players consistently describe the game as fun and enjoyable, with fast-paced and engaging gameplay that keeps them coming back for more.

Impressive visuals and audio: The game features stunning visuals and great audio design, including beautiful graphics, animations, and a solid soundtrack that enhances the overall experience.

Excellent sense of speed: The game delivers a thrilling sense of speed, making players feel like they are racing at incredibly high velocities, which is a standout feature.

Futuristic racing experience: The game offers a confident and technically ambitious entry in the futuristic racing genre, with a unique and engaging futuristic feel.

Customizable ships: Players can customize their ships with various performance and aesthetic components, adding depth to the gameplay.

Common complaints

Track design issues: There are several complaints about track design, including blind turns, poor visibility, and narrow tracks. These issues can make races frustrating and difficult.

Lack of track variety: Players feel that the tracks lack diversity and are not very memorable. Many tracks feel similar and uninspired.

Tracks are too long: Many players find the tracks excessively long and meandering, which can make the races feel tedious. This issue is particularly noted in some DLC tracks.

Game is very difficult: The game has a steep learning curve and is considered very hard, requiring a lot of memorization and practice. It may not be suitable for casual gamers.

Controls are complex: The controls are seen as overly complex and unconventional, which can be frustrating for players. The complexity of jumps and midair controls is particularly noted.

Gameplay and performance

Extensive ship customization: Players can customize their ships with various designs, modules, and cosmetics. The game offers a wide range of customization options, including different ship brands and upgradeable parts.

Varied and well-designed tracks: The game features a variety of tracks across different environments, each with unique characteristics and behaviors. This diversity enhances the racing experience by offering numerous events and challenges.

Multiple difficulty settings: The game offers various difficulty settings, catering to both casual and hardcore players. The difficulty curve is designed to provide a good learning experience.

Complex control mechanics: The game features complex controls involving pitch, roll, and acceleration, which can be challenging to master. Players can use assists to help with the controls.

Boost and speed mechanics: The game includes various speed and boost mechanics, allowing players to reach high speeds at the cost of health. Players can stack boosts and use brake mechanics strategically.

Stutter and performance issues: The game suffers from stutter issues, frame rate drops, freezes, and micro-stuttering, impacting the overall performance.

Steam Deck performance varies: The game runs smoothly on Steam Deck at medium/low settings with 30-40 FPS, but some users report poor visual quality and optimization issues.

Frequent crashes and errors: Users report constant crashes, Unreal errors, and Epic authentication errors, affecting gameplay stability.

High system requirements: The game requires a good PC configuration and the recommended specs seem low, leading users to tone down graphics settings.

Controller and graphical issues: Users report controller recognition issues and upgraded graphics from the previous version of the game.

Recommendations

Excellent gameplay with challenges: Reviewers praise the game for its excellent gameplay and challenging nature, though some note it is not perfect and may lack the depth of previous games.

Recommended for anti-gravity racing fans: The game is highly recommended for those who enjoy anti-gravity racing games, including both hardcore players and professionals.

Worth the price: Many reviewers feel the game is worth its price, suggesting it provides good value for money.

Recommended for Wipeout fans: The game is highly recommended for fans of Wipeout and similar high-speed racing games.

Recommended for fans of the first game: Fans of the original Redout and similar games are likely to enjoy this sequel.

Buying context

Community fair range: $20.00 - $30.00.

Game completion: 45.0h.

Story completion: 12.0h.

Session length: 0.5h.

Endgame: 100.0h.

The game has a steep learning curve and poorly balanced tutorials, making the initial experience frustrating. However, once players master the controls and mechanics, the game becomes substantially more enjoyable.

Reported time to anchor: 1h.

Player profiles

Hardcore Racer: Competitive and skill-focused, enjoys deep vehicle tuning and difficult tracks. Motivation: Mastery and challenge. Stance: buy.

Casual Learner: Uses assistance and community help to learn the game, enjoys gradual progression. Motivation: Learning and improvement. Stance: sale.

Multiplayer Enthusiast: Focuses on multiplayer modes, enjoys competing with others and being part of a community. Motivation: Community and competition. Stance: deep sale.

Platform notes

Steam Deck: The game has several notable issues, including problems with the overheating mechanic, performance on the Steam Deck, and launch/compatibility issues. While some users praise the visual quality, others find it lacking on the Steam Deck. The game requires some tinkering and adjustments to run smoothly, particularly on the Steam Deck.

Linux and Proton: The game generally runs well on Steam Deck, indicating good compatibility with Linux-based systems. While there are some reports of performance variability and the need for minor tweaks, the overall consensus is positive. The absence of kernel-level anti-cheat is appreciated, and community-driven solutions are available for any issues.