
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 83% · Negative 17%. Score: 17 / 100
Verdict
Fair Monetization
Summary
The game is highly praised for its fair monetization approach, with no microtransactions or pay-to-win mechanics. Users express a strong willingness to support the game through DLC purchases, indicating satisfaction with the base game and trust in the developers. There is a positive sentiment towards expanding the game content through DLCs, with users finding value in such expansions. Score: 10 / 100
Top points
Verdict
High Dependency on External Data for Inventory and Crafting Management
Summary
The primary user complaints revolve around the game's heavy reliance on spreadsheet management for inventory and crafting, which detracts from the gameplay experience. Many users feel that the game becomes more about managing spreadsheets than enjoying the simulation aspects. Additionally, there are mentions of the game feeling repetitive and unbalanced between life simulation and spreadsheet management. Score: 75 / 100
Top points
Verdict
Tinkering Required
Summary
The game has several notable issues that impact the user experience. Controller support and camera perspective are frequently mentioned as areas needing improvement. Performance issues, including high CPU usage and poor optimization, are significant concerns. Despite being listed as unsupported, some users report that the game works fine on Steam Deck, although there is a clear demand for better compatibility. Score: 50 / 100
Top points
Positives:
Negatives:
Gameplay:
Performance:
Recommendations:
Miscellaneous: