Roots of Pacha
Last updated: 2025-08-18
- Charming and unique prehistoric farming experience
- Innovative seed and crop domestication
- Lacks content and depth currently
- Repetitive and grindy gameplay
- Shallow and forgettable NPCs
- Days pass too quickly
Emotions
Players feel satisfied by the game's overall quality, unique prehistoric setting, and well-implemented mechanics such as animal breeding, irrigation, and clan development. The game offers a rich sense of progression, abundant content, and a cozy, relaxing atmosphere, often exceeding expectations for a farming simulation game and providing a fresh alternative to titles like Stardew Valley.
Joy stems from the game's charming and cute aesthetics, lovable characters, and heartwarming interactions, particularly with children and pets like mammoths. The unique blend of familiar farming sim elements with a prehistoric twist, coupled with engaging mini-games and a cooperative community feel, contributes to a consistently fun and mood-lifting experience.
Excitement is driven by the game's extensive content, depth, and continuous updates, which ensure a fresh and engaging experience that rarely gets boring. Players are thrilled by new discoveries, unique mechanics, and the anticipation of future content, often perceiving the game as a significant improvement or unique alternative within the farming sim genre.
Frustration arises from unintuitive controls, particularly with keyboard and mouse, and issues with multiplayer functionality like constant disconnects. Players also experience annoyance with grindy endgame requirements, unclear progression, and difficulties with navigation, NPC tracking, and certain mini-games like fishing, which can feel tedious or poorly explained.
Disappointment is primarily caused by a perceived lack of depth in the social aspects, including limited NPC dialogue and shallow character relationships. Players also express dissatisfaction with repetitive endgame tasks, a lack of meaningful content after a certain point, and issues with translation quality, leading to a feeling of wasted potential or boredom.
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 91% Ā· Negative 9%. Score: 9 / 100
Positives:
- Players consistently praise the game for its overall charm, unique prehistoric setting, and enjoyable gameplay, often comparing it favorably to Stardew Valley while highlighting its distinct identity. The art style, music, and general atmosphere contribute significantly to this positive reception.
- The game is lauded for its innovative mechanics that refresh the farming simulation genre. Specific praise is given to the unique prehistoric twists on familiar activities, the depth of its systems, and the engaging gameplay loop that keeps players invested.
- A strong sense of community and collaborative progression is a standout feature. Players appreciate how the village develops with their contributions and how NPCs actively participate in the growth, fostering a feeling of belonging and shared accomplishment.
- The game is consistently updated with new content, lore, and quality-of-life improvements, demonstrating strong developer commitment. This ongoing support enhances the already rich experience and keeps players engaged over time.
- The absence of combat, particularly in the mines, is a highly appreciated feature. This design choice contributes to a relaxed, stress-free gameplay experience, allowing players to focus on exploration, puzzles, and community building.
Negatives:
- The game is frequently described as lacking depth, becoming repetitive and boring after a relatively short period (around 20-70 hours). Players feel there isn't enough content, especially in the late game, leading to a loss of motivation and a sense of 'busywork' without meaningful progression or replayability. Many compare it unfavorably to Stardew Valley in terms of content and depth.
- A recurring sentiment is that the game falls short when compared to other popular farming simulation games, particularly Stardew Valley. Players feel it lacks the scope, depth, engaging characters, and overall 'magic' that makes similar titles addictive, often questioning its value proposition given the price.
- Many players find the gameplay loop to be overly grindy and tedious, particularly concerning resource gathering, tool upgrades, and certain mini-games like fishing. This repetitive nature contributes to the overall feeling of boredom and lack of satisfaction, making progression feel like a chore rather than an enjoyable experience.
- Players find the NPCs to be shallow, forgettable, and lacking distinct personalities and engaging dialogue. Many characters look similar, making them hard to distinguish, and there's a general lack of motivation to interact with them due to repetitive lines and uninteresting backstories. This significantly impacts the social simulation aspect of the game.
- Players feel that in-game days pass too quickly, making it difficult to complete daily tasks, quests, and interactions. This short day length, combined with long travel distances, creates a rushed and unrelaxing experience, hindering efficient gameplay.
Gameplay:
- The game heavily features farming, animal husbandry, and village building. Players contribute to their clan's development through these activities, fostering a sense of community and shared progress.
- The game is frequently compared to Stardew Valley but with a distinct prehistoric setting. It adopts many familiar farm-sim mechanics while introducing unique elements like a lack of combat and a focus on tribal development.
- Seed acquisition and crop domestication are central mechanics. Players must forage for wild seeds, which can then be 'domesticated' over time to improve quality, reflecting early agricultural practices.
- The game offers dozens of hours of gameplay, particularly for completionists, but some players note a slower start and potentially less content than similar titles after the main story is completed.
- The game incorporates a unique 'ideas' system for technological and cultural advancement. Players contribute to unlocking new tools, buildings, and techniques, reflecting the progression of a primitive society.
Performance:
- Many players report excellent performance on PC and Steam Deck, noting smooth online play, quick load times, and no significant bugs or controller issues. This indicates a well-optimized experience for a large portion of the player base.
- Players appreciate the game's low power consumption on the Steam Deck, allowing for extended gameplay sessions without needing to recharge frequently. This enhances portability and convenience.
- A specific quality-of-life feature was highlighted for co-op play: the ability for the host to save progress even if a co-op partner experiences a brief internet disconnection. This helps prevent loss of progress.
- One user mentioned playing on a Mac M2 Mini, which is a very specific and limited piece of feedback. While it indicates potential compatibility, it's not enough to draw broad conclusions about Mac performance.
Recommendations:
- The overwhelming majority of players highly recommend the game, especially to fans of the farming/life simulation genre, often comparing it favorably to Stardew Valley. Many consider it a must-buy and excellent value for money.
- While generally recommended, some players express concerns about the game's price, suggesting it might be better purchased on sale. A few reviewers did not recommend the game or requested refunds, though these were a minority.
- The game offers significant playtime, appealing to completionists, but some note that it can involve grinding. Players who prefer a slower pace and are patient will likely enjoy the experience.
- The game performs well on Steam Deck, and some players found that using a controller enhanced their gameplay experience.
- Playing the game in co-op mode with friends can help alleviate the need for extensive grinding, making the experience more enjoyable.
Miscellaneous:
- Players are highly anticipating and appreciative of ongoing content updates, including new areas, features like child growth and animal/plant evolution, and quality-of-life improvements. The consistent support from the developers is a significant positive.
- The game is frequently compared to Stardew Valley, often favorably, with players noting its unique Stone Age setting. While some still prefer Stardew Valley, many find Roots of Pacha to be a strong contender or even superior.
- Character design and personalities are well-received, with players finding NPCs personable and unique. Some players even express strong affection for specific characters, though one reviewer noted 'violently blonde' characters.
- The game is available on multiple platforms, including Steam and Switch, which is a positive for players. There was a temporary delisting from Steam due to a publisher dispute, which impacted visibility but has since been resolved.
- Players recommend engaging with the game's narrative through cutscenes and dialogue. While some suggest using guides for puzzles, others prefer playing without them for a more enjoyable discovery experience. The wiki is noted as helpful but incomplete.
