
Verdict
Mostly negative
Summary
Positive 38% · Negative 62%. Score: 62 / 100
Verdict
Predatory Monetization
Summary
The game features several predatory monetization practices, including a cosmetic shop with loot boxes, premium currency, and DLCs that can be purchased with real money. There are also elements that can be interpreted as pay-to-win, although these advantages can be obtained through gameplay as well. The game is perceived as overpriced, which adds to the dissatisfaction among players. These factors contribute to a high severity rating for the game's monetization practices. Score: 85 / 100
Top points
Verdict
Needs Significant Improvement
Summary
The game suffers from several significant issues that detract from the user experience. Complex mechanics are poorly explained, forcing users to rely on external guides. The inventory management system is user-unfriendly, and the game frequently crashes, particularly during alt-tabbing or fights. Additionally, many quests lack proper guidance, making them difficult to complete without external help. These issues collectively contribute to a frustrating and less enjoyable gaming experience. Score: 50 / 100
Top points
Verdict
Tinkering Required
Summary
The analysis of user feedback for the Steam Deck experience reveals several significant issues impacting the overall user experience. The most critical problems include frequent game crashes and stability issues, frame rate drops and performance problems, control and user interface difficulties, and long loading times coupled with network issues. These issues collectively contribute to a less than optimal gaming experience, requiring attention and potential fixes to enhance user satisfaction. Score: 75 / 100
Top points
Positives:
Negatives:
Gameplay:
Performance:
Recommendations:
Miscellaneous: