Info about Reentry - A Space Flight Simulator:

Official game description:
Reentry is a space flight simulator based on real life spacecrafts, and aims to meet the middle-ground between a simulator and a game. You create a new astronaut, gain levels and experience for every move you make by completing missions in space. You will have access to missions similar to what happened in real life, or fictional missions designed to challenge you as an astronaut.
Spacecrafts are highly complicated machines with the primary task of exploring and understanding what's outside the atmosphere of Earth, while keeping the astronauts alive for long periods. This is achieved by hundreds of individual systems and backup systems working together. With the help from the in-game Space Flight Academy, the provided flight manual for each spacecraft, and checklists, you will learn how to fly and operate these machines, and explore space in a high resolution and realistic environment.
Control almost every system like the real astronauts, see the sunset and sunrise while orbiting Earth with speeds exceeding 25,500 ft/s. Explore the surface of Earth and the Moon, or simply enjoy the solitude of being in space.
Imagine the final few seconds before launching into space. You are sitting on top of a 111 meter high rocket, looking at the instruments of a spaceship about to leave the oasis we call Earth. The engines are igniting, mechanical systems are clinging below you, while thousands of gallons of fuel is pumping through the systems. The loud roar of the five F1 engines are producing close to 8,000,000 pounds of thrust, violently shaking the cockpit and lifting 3 million kg off the pad. The launch pad tower is slowly moving away from you while the engines are balancing the rocket like a skyscraper on a needle. Sophisticated engineers has created the systems that will safely accelerate you to 25,500 ft/s, into a free fall orbit, with the Moon as the destination.
Welcome to Reentry, a space flight simulator.

Release date: Nov 7, 2025

Categories: Flight Simulation, Technical Simulation, Historical Simulation, Mission-based Gameplay, Cooperative Multiplayer, Character Progression, Virtual Reality, Education Simulation


- Hardware Profile: No data
Feature extractions:
- Community Price: No data
- Playtime Metrics: No data
- Time-to-fun: No data
- Player Archetypes: No data


Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category.
Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews.
What players like:
- Unparalleled Historical Space Simulation (weight 1): The game offers an extremely realistic and historically accurate simulation of the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs, meticulously recreating spacecraft, systems, and procedures. Players laud the deep immersion, educational value, and the feeling of truly experiencing early spaceflight.
- Excellent In-Game Learning System (weight 0.43): Despite the game's complexity, players consistently praise the comprehensive and well-structured in-game tutorials, flight manuals, and checklists. These learning aids effectively guide users through intricate procedures, making the simulation accessible and rewarding for all skill levels.
- Remarkable Solo Developer Vision (weight 0.24): The game is widely recognized as a 'labor of love' and an extraordinary achievement by its solo developer. Players admire the deep passion, meticulous attention to detail, and tireless effort that has gone into creating such a high-fidelity and comprehensive simulator.
- Consistent Active Development (weight 0.16): Players appreciate the game's continuous active development, marked by frequent updates, new features, and ongoing refinements. The developer's dedication, consistent vision, and active engagement with the community ensure a consistently improving and evolving experience.
- Impressive Visuals and Fidelity (weight 0.12): The game earns high marks for its beautiful graphics and exceptional visual detail, especially within the meticulously recreated and interactive cockpits. This visual fidelity, often highlighted in VR, significantly enhances the overall immersion and authentic feel of the simulation.
- Rewarding Sense of Achievement (weight 0.11): Players find great satisfaction and fun in mastering the game's complex procedures, such as docking or intricate flight maneuvers. Overcoming challenges and successfully executing operations provides a profound sense of accomplishment and gratifying skill progression.
- Functional & Interactive Cockpits (weight 0.09): A key feature praised by players is the highly interactive nature of the spacecraft cockpits, where almost every switch, button, and dial is functional. This level of granular control and system modeling deeply enhances realism and player immersion.
- Exceptional Gemini Program Focus (weight 0.06): The game is particularly praised for its dedicated and detailed representation of the Gemini program, which is often less covered in other space simulators. Players appreciate the accurate systems, challenging missions, and the educational value derived from experiencing this specific historical era.

Common complaints:
- Steep Learning Curve, Poor Onboarding (weight 0.37): Players consistently report the game is intimidatingly complex with a very steep learning curve. The current tutorials, manuals, and in-game explanations are insufficient, making it difficult for new players to understand core mechanics and progress without external help. This challenge is further exacerbated by language barriers for non-English speakers.
- Significant Technical Instability & Bugs (weight 0.35): Despite its 1.0 release, the game suffers from frequent crashes and numerous bugs, particularly within Apollo missions. Many systems feel unpolished, including basic VR interactions, graphical fidelity, and seamless transitions, suggesting the game still requires significant refinement and bug fixing akin to an Early Access title.
- Niche, Non-Traditional Gameplay (weight 0.09): Players note the game is not a traditional story-driven experience or an open-world sandbox, often describing it as a 'checklist button-pressing simulator'. This specific gameplay style, focused on historical accuracy and detailed procedures, may not appeal to casual gamers or those expecting a different type of space simulation.
- Inadequate Language Localization (weight 0.09): There is a significant lack of localization for several languages, including Spanish, Japanese, and Chinese. Key modules, sections, and even essential 200-page manuals are often only available in English, creating a major barrier for non-English speaking players.
- Unhelpful Player Community (weight 0.03): Some players find the community difficult to engage with, describing interactions as unhelpful and often encountering 'pseudo-intellectuals' rather than constructive assistance. This is problematic given the game's steep learning curve, which often forces players to seek external help.
- Subpar Planet Graphics (weight 0.02): Feedback indicates that the planet graphics, especially Earth, are not visually appealing and lack detail. This detracts from the experience of admiring views from the spacecraft's viewport during missions.

Gameplay feedback:
- Detailed procedural simulator (weight 0.45): This is a highly technical, study-level cockpit simulator emphasizing realistic procedures, accurate physics, and authentic instrumentation. Players must operate complex systems by flipping numerous switches and adhering strictly to checklists, akin to 'DCS in space'.
- Recreates NASA programs (weight 0.4): The game meticulously simulates historical U.S. space programs, progressing from Mercury through Gemini to Apollo. Players experience accurate procedures and interact with detailed spacecraft cockpits for each era, culminating in complex missions like lunar landings.
- Steep learning curve (weight 0.26): The game demands significant time, patience, and meticulous study due to its deep systems and complex procedures. Players must be willing to read manuals and invest hours to master the simulation, making it unsuitable for casual players.
- VR and varied controls (weight 0.15): The game features experimental VR support, enhancing immersion, though it may require specific setup and has minor limitations. While keyboard and mouse are functional for the switch-heavy interface, a joystick, TrackIR, or VR controllers are often recommended for an improved experience.
- Mission Control multiplayer (weight 0.14): A unique feature allows players to participate as Mission Control, assisting an astronaut during missions, particularly for the Apollo program. This multi-person collaborative aspect is a highlight and is still being expanded.
- Varied mission structures (weight 0.13): The game offers structured campaigns, an 'Academy' for learning, and historical missions. Players can also enjoy free play, create custom scenarios, and anticipate planned features like advanced mission editing and failures.

Performance notes:
- Stable performance, generally optimized (weight 0.1): Many players report stable performance, few crashes, and smooth gameplay, especially after initial setup or once hardware issues are resolved. Some players note poor optimization for certain setups but overall stability is high, with no frame drops after loading. Over 20 hours of playtime consistently resulted in no system crashes for many.
- Varied hardware performance (weight 0.08): The game's performance varies significantly based on hardware. While high-end systems (e.g., RTX 3070, 5090) report excellent results, older or less powerful setups (e.g., RTX 2060, SteamDeck) may experience lower frame rates (around 24 FPS on SteamDeck with 'balanced' preset) or minor bugs. It's suggested that if a PC/VR can handle MSFS, it can handle Reentry.
- Simulation prioritized over graphics (weight 0.03): Players understand that the game's primary focus is on an accurate and authentic simulation experience rather than cutting-edge visual fidelity. The existing graphics are considered more than sufficient and functional for the simulator genre.
- Positive Proton performance (weight 0.02): The game performs quite well through Proton, which is positive news for players running the game on Linux-based systems.
- Fast loading screens (weight 0.02): The game features quick loading times, which enhances the overall flow and player experience by minimizing wait times.
- Adjust settings for stability (weight 0.02): One player noted that reducing graphics settings was crucial to resolve a game freeze during a lesson, indicating that tweaking visual options can improve stability on specific systems.

Recommendations:
- Ideal for space/sim enthusiasts. (weight 0.58): This game is highly recommended for players passionate about space history, realistic simulations, and detailed control of complex spacecraft from programs like Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo. It caters to a niche audience seeking a deep, authentic experience akin to hardcore simulators like DCS or MSFS.
- Highly recommended and praised. (weight 0.42): Players overwhelmingly recommend this game, often giving it perfect or near-perfect scores. Many consider it a must-have, praising its quality, potential, and immersive experience, promising years of enjoyment for dedicated players.
- Requires significant player dedication. (weight 0.14): The game is not for casual players seeking arcade action or quick gratification. It demands a willingness to study manuals, practice procedures, and invest significant time to master its complex systems and checklists. Those unwilling to dedicate this effort should avoid it.
- Early access state considerations. (weight 0.12): While much praised, some feedback suggests newcomers might consider waiting for the official release or be aware that the game is not yet 100% complete. However, many find it well worth the price even in early access for those who don't mind ongoing development.
- Great for VR users. (weight 0.03): The game is highly recommended for players with VR setups, especially PCVR veterans who can manage potential limitations and have adequate hardware. It offers an immersive experience for those with the right equipment.
- Superior to similar titles. (weight 0.03): Players with experience in other space simulators like Orbiter find this game highly usable. It is considered a more realistic and 'real stuff' alternative compared to games like Kerbal Space Program.
- Recommends specific control setups. (weight 0.02): Players suggest using dual joysticks for optimal control and creating custom keyboard mappings for camera movement. These recommendations aim to enhance the gameplay experience through optimized input methods.
- Valuable educational tool. (weight 0.02): The game is seen as a valuable educational resource, with potential to be used commonly as a learning tool for spaceflight history and mechanics. Its accuracy and depth contribute to this perception.
- Use refund policy to try. (weight 0.01): A practical suggestion for hesitant buyers is to try the game for under two hours to assess if it suits their preferences, leveraging the platform's refund policy. This allows players to personally evaluate its fit.
- Encourages community engagement. (weight 0.01): A reviewer highly encourages players to become a part of the game's community, suggesting a positive and supportive environment around the game.
- Eager for Gemini content. (weight 0.01): A player expressed readiness for the Gemini program, indicating excitement for future content development within the game's historical scope and continued engagement with the simulator.

Other player notes:
- Excitement for Future Content (weight 0.23): The community expresses significant excitement for upcoming content and missions, including the Space Shuttle, more complex Apollo missions (like lunar landings), and eventually Mars, deep space, or current-era spacecraft like the ISS. There is a clear desire for the game to continue expanding its historical and functional scope with future updates.
- Impressive Solo Developer Effort (weight 0.19): Players are highly impressed by the dedication and sheer amount of work put into the game by a single developer, Petri Wilhelmsen, over many years. This commitment is seen as a labor of love, fostering strong admiration and hope for continued development and polish.
- High Player Engagement & Utility (weight 0.13): Many players report extensive gameplay hours and deep personal connections to the game over several years, actively engaging with various missions. Some utilize it for teaching or content creation, particularly enjoying the immersive VR experience.
- Deeply Realistic & Challenging (weight 0.12): Players consistently appreciate the game's high level of realism and intricate detail, which demands significant learning and reading to master. It is recognized as a serious simulator for an informed audience, providing a profound understanding of historical space programs.
- Nearing 1.0 Release (weight 0.11): The game is widely recognized as being in its final stages of Early Access (Ver.0.99 or 0.75 noted, with some congratulating on V1.0), with players eagerly anticipating the official full release. This indicates ongoing development and a transition towards a complete product.
- Request for Multiplayer Co-op (weight 0.08): Many players are interested in the addition of a multiplayer or co-operative mode, specifically highlighting the idea of multiple players operating within the same capsule. Its absence is noted as a key area for improvement, with some believing it is a planned feature.
- Minor Bugs & Feature Ideas (weight 0.08): Players have noted some specific points like the length of the Mercury mission, a desire for more dynamic radio chatter, and minor existing bugs. There is also interest in broader features such as workshop support and dynamic failures.
- Active Developer & Community (weight 0.08): The developer is praised for being highly responsive to feedback and implementing suggestions quickly, often accessible via platforms like Discord. This fosters a strong and collaborative community of 'virtual astronauts' who actively engage with the game and its creator.
- Request for More Languages (weight 0.05): Several players express a desire for additional language support, particularly French and Chinese, to make the game more accessible to a wider international audience. While not universally blocking, it is identified as an area for potential improvement in accessibility.
- Alternative Simulators Preferred by Some (weight 0.02): One reviewer indicated a preference for Orbiter BETA R90 with NASSP, citing better stability and ease of learning despite potentially inferior graphics. This suggests that some players might find other simulators more user-friendly for initial engagement.

Emotions:
- Satisfaction (weight 0.3): Players feel satisfied by the game's exceptional realism, detailed simulation, and historical accuracy, particularly with fully functional cockpits and faithful mission recreations. This is enhanced by effective and comprehensive tutorials, a rewarding learning curve, and the constant support from the developer and community, which contributes to a seamless and immersive experience.
- Excitement (weight 0.15): Players are excited by the game's stunning visuals, authentic physics, and high-fidelity simulation, which create an immersive experience. This excitement is fueled by the challenge of historical missions, the prospect of mastering complex spacecraft, and strong anticipation for future content, updates, and the game's continuous development.
- Frustration (weight 0.08): Players experience frustration due to the game's steep learning curve, complex systems, and sometimes unclear tutorials, exacerbated by a lack of multilingual support. Frequent crashes, especially after the 1.0 update, along with unintuitive controls and issues like unresponsive prompts or an unhelpful community, significantly detract from the challenging experience.
- Admiration (weight 0.06): Players express strong admiration for the solo developer's exceptional dedication, passion, and hard work, which is evident in the game's meticulous detail, historical accuracy, and high-fidelity simulation. This "labor of love" is seen as a singular achievement, effectively bringing complex spaceflight procedures and historical missions to life with remarkable authenticity.
- Appreciation (weight 0.06): Players appreciate the developer's continuous dedication, responsiveness, and active communication, particularly in providing updates, bug fixes, and comprehensive documentation. The "labor of love" nature of this solo-developed project, combined with the excellent virtual cockpits and a supportive community, significantly enhances the overall experience.
- Disappointment (weight 0.04): Players feel disappointed by frequent crashes, especially after the 1.0 update, which hinder their ability to fully enjoy the game. Other issues include a perceived lack of clear guidance for new players, mediocre graphics for external elements like Earth and clouds, and the absence of desired features like a robust multiplayer mode or the Space Shuttle.
- Joy (weight 0.03): Players experience joy primarily from the game's immersive ability to fulfill childhood dreams of being an astronaut and experiencing spaceflight. This is amplified by the fun gameplay, the overall enjoyable and highly realistic simulation, and the sense of accomplishment derived from mastering complex missions like Gemini-Agena docking.
- Awe (weight 0.03): Players are filled with awe by the game's stunning visual detail, particularly the realistic recreation of spacecraft cockpits and the beauty of space and Earth in VR. The profound historical immersion and the simulator's outrageous fidelity, showcasing human ingenuity and meticulous developer commitment, contribute to an exceptional and educational experience.
- Amazement (weight 0.03): Players express amazement at the game's insane level of detail and thoroughness in simulating spacecraft and missions, noting the extensive work involved. The incredible functionality, depth, and educational value, especially in VR, leave players feeling like they are barely scratching the surface even after significant playtime.
- Enjoyment (weight 0.02): Players find enjoyment in the game's intricate and meticulous focus, which makes the step-by-step learning process rewarding and fun. The interactive cockpit elements, rich audio, and the depth of historical missions contribute to a captivating experience that encourages players to sink many hours into the simulation.
- Anticipation (weight 0.02): Players express strong anticipation for future content and developments, especially the upcoming Space Shuttle DLC and more complex modules like Saturn V and Apollo. This excitement is driven by the rewarding challenge of mastering new spacecraft and the promise of continued progression within the game's extensive simulation.
- Hope (weight 0.02): Players express hope for the game's continued development, including the addition of new content like the Space Shuttle and more current ships, as well as features such as co-op and workshop support. There is also a strong desire for improved accessibility through official localization into languages like Chinese and Spanish, along with more beginner-friendly assistance.
- Challenge (weight 0.02): Players experience the game as a significant challenge due to its steep learning curve and study-level simulation, requiring extensive time and dedication to understand and master. The complex interface and hardcore nature present a high entry barrier, but this inherent difficulty is often embraced as a positive aspect of the immersive experience.
- Love (weight 0.02): Players express love for the game's overall quality, rewarding gameplay, and highly realistic spaceflight simulation, which includes user-friendly features like personalized manuals. The ability to fall in love with historical programs, such as Gemini, and experience a 1-1 scale representation of actual spacecraft contributes to a deeply positive and enjoyable experience.
- Informative (weight 0.01): The game is described as informative through detailed comparisons to other simulators like DCS, specific insights into performance on platforms like SteamDeck, and a thorough explanation of its realistic, complicated style. This includes clear communication about the significant learning curve and a detailed breakdown of features to aid purchasing decisions.
- Caution (weight 0.01): Players express caution regarding the game's demanding nature, emphasizing the necessity of a willingness to study extensively. The initial difficulty, high memorization requirements, and non-traditional simulation style carry a risk of overwhelming players who are not prepared for a deep, study-level experience.
- Gratitude (weight 0.01): Players express gratitude for the developer's active involvement in incorporating feedback and implementing continuous improvements, especially regarding the amazing VR experience. This dedication is appreciated for opening the door to the world of authentic space flights and for the consistent support received.
- Confusion (weight 0.01): Players experience confusion due to the initial complexity of the game, particularly with the Gemini module, and some seemingly unrealistic behaviors. This includes the consistent landing location despite poor reentry burns, which can break immersion and raise questions about simulation fidelity in certain aspects.
- Nostalgia (weight 0.01): The game evokes nostalgia by fulfilling childhood dreams and connecting players with early memories of spaceflight, particularly their fascination with NASA and iconic events like the Moon landing. For "children of the 80s" and others, it vividly brings to life the era of early space conquest, tapping into a deep sense of historical connection.
- Enthusiasm (weight 0.01): Players express enthusiasm stemming from the game's overall quality and authenticity, often conveyed through detailed and passionate descriptions of its various gameplay and technical aspects. This positive sentiment highlights a strong enjoyment and appreciation for the entire gaming experience.}