Info about Minion Masters:

Official game description:
The realm's greatest Masters face off in a never-ending conflict for glory. Will you play Control, Aggressive, Swarm or Giant Minions? Choose a Master matching your playstyle and build the best deck to overthrow your opponents in short intense real-time games!
Join millions of players worldwide and discover one of the best ever rated free games on Steam! Minion Masters is insanely fun and simple, but challenging to master. A Dynamic Online Tactical game for both competitive and casual players.
Play 1v1 duels or combine decks in 2v2 multiplayer, with full cross-play for Steam, Xbox, and more to come! Jump into Draft to test your strategic prowess, or even Mayhem where the game rules are changed weekly! Embark on solo adventures through the different ages and conflicts of the continent. Discover the legends of the Crystal Elves, Empyreans, Zen-chi, and more!
**INNOVATIVE ONLINE FANTASY STRATEGY WITH RPG ELEMENTS**
--------------------------------------------------------
Hold bridges to level up and unlock your Master’s powers, capable of changing the fate of a game. Summon swarms of Scrats, draw from the Book of the Dead or enrage your minions! Spells and Minions all have specific mechanics: make the right move and enable a combo to take your opponent by surprise!
Choose your Master and build your deck from 9 factions, each with their own specialty. Match your Master & cards to create countless combos and tactics; only your creativity is the limit.
Play **_your own way_**, come up with **_your own strategies_** and show off **_your skill_** in the arena!
**TRULY FAIR-TO-PLAY & BALANCED ONLINE MULTIPLAYER**
----------------------------------------------------
We’re committed to a fair experience in which only skill matters. In Minion Masters, you can easily earn, craft, or try to loot cards - and that’s all you’ll ever need to be competitive. Anyone can take on anyone, it all comes down to YOUR skill.
This card game offers countless free rewards to help you collect over 260 minions and spells with daily quests, special events and fun game modes. Earn new cards for free and without randomness with the free season pass!
**JOIN A GUILD, MEET PLAYERS, PLAY CO-OP**
------------------------------------------
Take part in something that matters! Join a guild, you will always be welcomed in the tavern!
Team up in 2v2, combine your decks to create the ultimate strategy and reach Contender rank together!
Meet players in a positive and active community. Follow streamers on Twitch, earn prizes with drops and link your account to appear in the arena and interact in real-time with chat commands!
**  
FEATURE LIST**
-------------------
*   _Ranked 1v1 and 2v2 full of action_
*   _Quick online battle games from 2 to 6 minutes_
*   _Beautiful graphics in this full 3D game._
*   _Crazy modes: Draft, Mayhem, Adventures…_
*   _260+ Cards to collect from many different factions always at war_
*   _13 awesome Masters each with 3 powers, and more to come_
*   _Customizable arenas, skins, emotes, guilds..._
*   _Epic fantasy lore!_
*   _Guilds_
*   _Loads of free rewards_
*   _Community tournaments_
*   _Twitch prizes and events_
*   _Constant community selected balance tweaks_
Massive new Co-op game from BetaDwarf
-------------------------------------
We're making a massive new Top-down Loot & Extract game and will start invites for alpha testing soon, check out our developer page to get access!

Release date: May 24, 2019

Categories: Deckbuilding, Real-time Strategy, Tower Defense, Card-based Gameplay, Cooperative Multiplayer, Competitive Multiplayer, Character Progression, Cross-play

Feature scans:
- MTX: score 87; verdict: Predatory / Casino; summary: The reviews provide direct evidence of real-money loot boxes, paid card packages, premium Battle Pass cards, reduced free premium currency, multiple currencies, limited-time offers, and high cosmetic pricing. Although many players defend the game as not pay-to-win and fully earnable, the monetization evidence is strong enough to classify it as predatory.
- Wiki: score 10; verdict: Tier 4: The Tourist; summary: The filtered feedback is dominated by technical stability issues, network lag, and confusion around in-game guidance or support. No review explicitly requests farming or drop-rate data, inventory or crafting valuation data, or quest/build/secret mechanics guidance. Under the strict priority rules, no Tier 1-3 trigger is present, so the audit falls to the default Tier 4 score.
- Proton/Linux: score 40; verdict: Mostly playable with Linux crash issues; summary: Linux/Proton feedback is mixed. Several users report that the game works out of the box or perfectly via Proton, indicating broad baseline compatibility. However, a notable subset reports Linux-specific crashes, including one post-update crash that persisted across all Proton versions tried and another case of occasional Linux crashes during ranked matches. There is no clear evidence of anti-cheat, DRM, launcher blockers, or broad workaround-heavy setup.
- Steam Deck: score 85; verdict: Broken on Steam Deck: frequent crashes and major UI/input issues; summary: Reviews show a split picture: some users run the game well on Linux/Proton and Steam Deck, but a large cluster reports frequent crashes, update-related Linux breakage, missing controller support, and small or unreadable text. These issues create substantial friction and sometimes make matches or sessions unplayable.

- Hardware Profile:
  - Summary: The provided cohort reports poor stability, with constant crashing on a Windows system in the 12-15GB VRAM range.
  - Sample size: 44 (0% coverage)
  - Audience skew: Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
  - Windows 12-15GB VRAM (negative, 17 reports): A reviewer reports constant crashing on a 16GB VRAM, 32GB RAM Windows 11 system and says several other people are affected.
  - Caveats: 44 of 19760 reviews expose hardware metadata.; Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
Feature extractions:
- Community Price:
  - Community fair range: $0.00
  - Reasoning: The reviews consistently treat the base game as free-to-play: the free price tag and free entry point are presented as core value, while negative reviews criticize balance, bugs, rewards, or DLC/shop monetization rather than arguing for a higher base price. One negative review says it is not worth playing even though it is free, which reinforces that the community does not associate a positive base-game price with it. Because price objections in the evidence concern DLC, season passes, rubies, or other monetization that must be ignored, the fair base-game range is effectively $0.
- Playtime Metrics:
  - Game completion: 100.0h
  - Story completion: N/A
  - Session length: 0.5h
  - Endgame: 400.0h
  - Reasoning: The 100-hour quote directly states a 100% completion time, so gameCompletion is set to 100 hours. The half-hour and 15–30 minute quotes show short play sessions, so sessionLength is estimated at 0.5 hours. The 400+ hour quote reports a long-term player who has completed the card and hero collection, supporting an endgame estimate of about 400 hours. No review gives a clear story-completion time, so storyCompletion is null.
- Time-to-fun:
  - Summary: Players often report immediate fun from the tutorial and quick matches, but many say enjoyment later falls off due to grind, pay-to-win pressure, repetition, balance problems, and technical issues.
  - Stance: Fun then drops
  - Anchor: N/A
  - Time to anchor: N/A
  - Friction: Long tutorial and a level 6 requirement before team battles; Forced tutorial and early losses against stronger decks; Early matchmaking imbalance and bot-heavy low ranks; Post-tutorial flash deals and monetization prompts; Grind for cards and competitive decks; Technical issues such as lag, bugs, disconnects, and long loading
  - Unlock drivers: Playing the first few non-tutorial matches against bots reveals the strategy and makes the game feel neat; Co-op or 2v2 with friends increases enjoyment; Understanding basic card counters such as anti-tank, area damage, and anti-air is enough to start; Tutorial card rewards and new cards
  - Conditions: Playing with friends or in co-op/2v2; Preference for multiplayer over solo play; Tolerance for grinding or spending; Completing the tutorial and reaching level 6 for team battles; Understanding basic card counters; Short sessions and quick matches; Low-rank bot-heavy matchmaking
- Player Archetypes:
  - Casual Quick-Session Strategist (buy)
    - Motivation: To get quick, relaxing strategy fun in short play sessions.
    - Playstyle: Short casual PvP or solo matches, often in brief breaks, with light deck experimentation rather than hardcore grinding.
    - Experience: mixed
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: casual; chill
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Social 2v2 Co-op Player (buy)
    - Motivation: To share team-based fun and social interaction with friends or a partner.
    - Playstyle: 2v2 co-op and team battles with friends or random teammates, often in a casual social setting.
    - Experience: mixed
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: co-op
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Competitive Ranked Meta Climber (no buy)
    - Motivation: To climb ranked ladders and master the competitive meta.
    - Playstyle: Ranked 1v1 or 2v2 with optimized meta decks, counterpicks, fast-cycle strategies, and leaderboard pushing.
    - Experience: veteran
    - Purchase stance: no buy
    - Labels: competitive; tryhard
    - Reference games: Clash Royale
  - Free-to-Play Deck Collector (buy)
    - Motivation: To collect cards and build competitive decks through in-game progression without paying.
    - Playstyle: Grinds gold, tokens, daily quests, free DLC, and battle passes; crafts key cards and experiments with affordable decks.
    - Experience: familiar
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: free-to-play; F2P
    - Reference games: Clash Royale


Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category.
Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews.
What players like:
- Highly fun core gameplay (weight 0.23): Many reviewers find the game genuinely fun and enjoyable, with intuitive and satisfying core mechanics. The gameplay is consistently praised as entertaining and thrilling.
- Generous free-to-play model (weight 0.23): Reviewers appreciate that the game is free-to-play with fair monetization, and all cards can be obtained without spending money. The model is seen as generous and not pay-to-win.
- Addictive quick matches (weight 0.12): The game is described as addictive, with fast matches lasting only a few minutes that are perfect for quick play sessions. This combination makes it easy to keep playing.
- Extensive deck building variety (weight 0.11): Players highlight the huge number of deck building options, with a wide variety of minions, masters, and cards enabling creative strategies. This diversity keeps the game interesting over time.
- Enjoyable multiplayer and co-op (weight 0.07): Players enjoy playing with friends, especially in the chaotic and fun 2v2 mode. The game supports solo, friend, and random matchmaking well.
- Favorable comparison to Clash Royale (weight 0.07): The game is often compared positively to Clash Royale, with reviewers noting better graphics, more synergies, and more technical gameplay. It is seen as a strong alternative.
- High potential and strong concept (weight 0.06): Many players see a lot of potential in the game and believe it has a great concept at its core. Despite issues, the underlying idea is considered strong.
- Beginner friendly and accessible (weight 0.04): The game is welcoming to new players, easy to pick up, and friendly towards all types of players. This accessibility contributes to its broad appeal.
- Regular updates and new content (weight 0.04): Frequent monthly updates bring new cards, balance changes, and bug fixes, with new cards often available for free. This keeps the game fresh and engaging.
- Strategic depth with simple learning (weight 0.04): The gameplay is easy to learn but offers deep strategy and counterplay, keeping matches interesting. Reviewers praise the strategic elements.
- Nostalgia for past quality (weight 0.04): Some reviewers feel the game used to be better, recalling it as beautiful and brilliant in the past. This suggests a perceived decline in quality over time.

Common complaints:
- Persistent bugs and glitches (weight 0.2): The game is widely described as buggy, broken, and plagued with errors that have persisted for years. Many players feel the game is unplayable due to the sheer volume of bugs.
- Frequent game crashes (weight 0.18): Players report the game crashing constantly at random moments, including during matches, at startup, and even when closing. The crashes are unpredictable and sometimes require a hard PC restart.
- 2.0 update ruined game (weight 0.16): The 2.0 update is blamed for destroying the game's joy and stability, with many considering it one of the worst updates in history. It introduced numerous bugs and made the game virtually unplayable.
- Unbalanced matchmaking (weight 0.13): Matchmaking frequently pairs high-rank players with much lower-ranked opponents, creating extremely unfair matches. Issues include mixing ranks like Master with Gold, and pitting new players against level 300+ veterans.
- Development abandoned (weight 0.11): Players believe the developers have stopped updating and caring for the game, shifting focus to a new project. The game is described as abandoned and no longer under active development.
- Connection issues (weight 0.09): Frequent disconnections and constant connection problems disrupt gameplay. These issues often occur mid-match, leading to unfair losses.
- Bots in matches (weight 0.09): Many matches, especially in 2v2 and ranked modes, are filled with bots instead of real players. This occurs frequently after the 2.0 update and up to Master rank.
- Game is dying (weight 0.08): Players perceive the game as slowly dying, with a drastically low and dwindling player base. Many feel it is no longer worth playing and have quit.
- Updates worsen gameplay (weight 0.08): The game has deteriorated with each major update, particularly after the mobile platform changes. Mechanics have been made worse and the overall experience is now considered trash.
- UI bugs and navigation issues (weight 0.07): The user interface is plagued with bugs, such as tabs not responding to clicks and screens not switching properly. Menus are described as a buggy mess.
- Pay-to-win monetization (weight 0.06): The game is criticized as pay-to-win, with significant content locked behind paywalls and manipulative spending tactics. Players feel frustrated by the increasing focus on monetization.
- Broken report system (weight 0.04): The in-game report button does not work, and bug report submissions are broken. Players are unable to report issues effectively.
- Mobile-focused UI on PC (weight 0.04): The interface is designed for mobile and adapts poorly to PC, resulting in a cluttered and broken UI experience. The redesign focuses on mobile with minimal scaling for PC.

Gameplay feedback:
- Core deckbuilding gameplay (weight 0.32): Players build decks from a large card pool and use them in matches, with many combinations and strategic depth. Deck construction is a central system across the game.
- Matchmaking and team pairing (weight 0.18): The game offers matchmaking that pairs players into teams and ranked matches, sometimes mixing veterans with random players. Infinite waiting can occur when player counts are low.
- Solo and duo modes (weight 0.12): Players can play alone or in pairs, with both solo and duo modes supporting progression. Duo play includes preconstructed and ranked options.
- Fast 1v1 and 2v2 battles (weight 0.11): Matches are quick, typically lasting a few minutes, and include both 1v1 and 2v2 formats. Team battles are a core part of the experience.
- Ranked ladder and progression (weight 0.08): Ranked matches and a ladder with leagues allow players to climb and face rank loss on defeat. The system includes high ranks like Diamond.
- Tower defense card hybrid (weight 0.07): The game blends deckbuilding and collectible card mechanics with real-time tower defense strategy. Players deploy cards to defend and attack in real time.
- Co-op play with friends (weight 0.07): Cooperative play is supported through 2v2 modes and adventures, allowing friends to team up. Premade co-op offers deep strategic play.
- Varied game modes available (weight 0.07): Multiple modes are accessible from the menu, including standard, Mayhem, Draft, and co-op adventures. This provides diverse gameplay experiences.
- No pay wall for cards (weight 0.05): The card collection can be completed through gameplay without spending money. Progression is available without pay walls.
- Base destruction combat (weight 0.04): Players deploy minions, spells, and buildings to destroy the enemy base on a split arena. Units fight each other while players aim to topple the opponent's base.
- Diverse card types (weight 0.04): Cards include air and ground units, spells, spawners, defense buildings, and hero units. Card categories span warriors, spells, and buildings.
- Strategic competitive card game (weight 0.04): The game is a strategy card game with team play and competitive 2v2 PvP. It offers a variety of cards and strategic depth.
- Social and chat features (weight 0.04): Chat, friends list, and bug reporting features are available for player interaction. These social tools support community engagement.
- Bots fill matchmaking gaps (weight 0.04): Bots may be used to fill matches during long searches or at higher levels. This helps reduce queue times but can affect match quality.
- Guilds and clan system (weight 0.04): Clans and guilds are part of the game, including guild activity and clan chat. This adds a social layer for group play.
- Multiple in-game currencies (weight 0.04): The game uses currencies such as Gold, Power Tokens, Shards, and Rubies. Rubies are noted as a premium currency that can feel pay-to-win.
- Battle pass progression system (weight 0.04): A battle pass with ranks, levels, and rewards provides a progression track. It is a feature of the game's monetization and reward structure.

Performance notes:
- Frequent random game crashes (weight 0.14): Players report the game crashing constantly at random moments, both on PC and mobile, making it hard to play reliably.
- Long loading times (weight 0.09): Loading screens are excessively long on any system, sometimes requiring a restart to proceed.
- Crashes after or during matches (weight 0.08): Crashes frequently occur at the end of matches or mid-match, roughly every few ranked games.
- Frequent network disconnections (weight 0.08): Players experience constant connection drops and server disconnects, often causing lost progress.
- Network lag and connection bugs (weight 0.06): Players experience network lag and numerous connection bugs alongside disconnections.
- Disconnects during matches (weight 0.05): Server disconnections happen in the middle of matches and also after matches, disrupting gameplay.
- Crashes worsened by 2.0 update (weight 0.05): Many players note crashes increased significantly after the 2.0 update, with some saying the game never crashed before it.
- Poor optimization and lag (weight 0.05): The game runs slowly and lags even on capable hardware, indicating poor optimization.
- Game freezes during battles (weight 0.04): Hard freezes occur during fights, sometimes at the start of battles, forcing players to restart.
- Crash when quitting game (weight 0.04): The game crashes every time the player tries to close it, and sometimes closes on its own.
- Crash when reporting bugs (weight 0.04): Using the in-game report function causes the game to crash and reopen, hindering bug reporting.
- Stuck on loading screen (weight 0.03): Players get stuck on the loading screen and cannot enter the game, requiring a restart.
- Severe lag makes game unplayable (weight 0.03): Some players experience very large delays and lag, especially on consoles, rendering the game unplayable.
- Micro-stutters regardless of settings (weight 0.03): Constant micro-stutters persist no matter the graphics settings, affecting smoothness.
- Crashes and disconnects after crossplay (weight 0.03): The crossplay patch introduced frequent crashes and server disconnections for some players.
- Interface and visual bugs (weight 0.03): Various interface and visual bugs are reported, though details are vague.

Recommendations:
- Strongly discouraged by many reviewers (weight 0.14): Multiple reviewers advise against playing the game, some citing a waste of time and money and recommending that new players stay away.
- Overall positive recommendations exist (weight 0.09): Several reviewers give a strong recommendation, calling it a great game and one of the best free games available.
- Free-to-play lowers the barrier (weight 0.08): Reviewers highlight that being free to play means there is no financial risk in trying it, which encourages players to check it out.
- Some reviewers do not recommend (weight 0.08): A few reviewers explicitly state they do not recommend the game, sometimes due to its current state or discontinued status.
- Mixed recommendations due to bugs (weight 0.06): Some reviewers cannot recommend the game while bugs remain, while others recommend it only if the bugs are repaired first.
- Suited to quick short matches (weight 0.05): The game is recommended for players who want short matches lasting roughly 1.5 to 5 minutes to pass the time.
- Appeals to strategy and tower defense fans (weight 0.03): Reviewers recommend it for players who enjoy tower defense, deck building, and real-time strategy elements.
- Friendly toward new players (weight 0.02): The game is recommended for new players because it is considered friendly and accessible to them.
- Concerns about younger players (weight 0.02): Some reviewers advise younger players to stay away from the game, suggesting it may not be suitable for them.
- Discontinued and no longer worth it (weight 0.02): The game is described as discontinued and not worth installing or playing anymore.
- Warning against new game purchase (weight 0.02): Reviewers advise against buying the developer's new game and some can no longer recommend the game.

Other player notes:
- Clash Royale comparison dominant (weight 0.2): Many reviewers describe the game as a PC version or close analog of Clash Royale. Several consider it an improved or better version of that formula.
- Free-to-play accessible progression (weight 0.14): Reviewers frequently note the game is free to play and can be progressed without spending real money. Paid content is described as optional.
- Monetization via DLC and shop (weight 0.09): The game is monetized through DLC and an in-game shop with optional purchases. Some DLC is periodically given away for free.
- Development has stopped (weight 0.07): Multiple reviewers report the game is no longer receiving updates and has been abandoned by its developers. The developers reportedly moved on to a next project.
- Small and declining playerbase (weight 0.06): Reviewers describe the community as small and slowly shrinking over time. The limited population affects the multiplayer experience.
- Version 2.0 overhauled the game (weight 0.06): A major 2.0 update drastically changed progression and monetization compared to version 1.0. Reviewers note it was a significant redesign.
- No card leveling system (weight 0.04): Unlike Clash Royale, the game has no card upgrade or leveling system that increases card strength. Reviewers view this as a fairer design with better graphics.
- Large card pool available (weight 0.03): The game features a large roster of roughly 300 cards. Reviewers highlight the variety and unique card designs.
- Mobile version exists (weight 0.03): The game was redesigned for the mobile market and supports mobile devices. This expanded access beyond the original platform.

Emotions:
- Frustration (weight 0.27): Players are frustrated by persistent technical failures including frequent crashes, freezes, connection errors, and endless loading loops that make the game unplayable. Matchmaking is also a major source of frustration, with players facing cheaters, bots, AFK teammates, and unfair rank disparities. Additionally, pay-to-win progression and confusing UI design compound the sense of being unable to enjoy or progress fairly.
- Disappointment (weight 0.2): Disappointment stems from the game's decline, particularly after the 2.0 update which introduced bugs, removed features, and ruined the experience compared to earlier versions. Players are also let down by the developers abandoning the game, ignoring feedback, and failing to address long-standing issues. The loss of a once-beloved game, nostalgia for its better days, and the sense that it never reached its potential are central themes.
- Anger (weight 0.07): Anger is driven by rampant cheating, griefing, and toxic behavior that goes unpunished due to broken reporting and moderation systems. Players are furious about severe technical issues like crashes, disconnects, and bugs, especially when they lead to lost matches or rank. The developers' perceived negligence, cash-grab mentality, and unfair monetization further fuel outrage.
- Enjoyment (weight 0.07): Players enjoy the core gameplay loop, describing it as fun, addictive, and well-designed with fast matches, strategic deckbuilding, and engaging co-op modes. The game is praised for its free-to-play friendliness and depth, often compared favorably to similar titles. Many appreciate the casual yet competitive nature that keeps them coming back.
- Satisfaction (weight 0.04): Satisfaction arises from the game's fair free-to-play model, where players can earn cards and progress without spending money. The balanced gameplay, diverse modes, and skill-based matches provide a sense of accomplishment, especially when winning with basic cards. Easy learning curve and generous rewards contribute to a fulfilling experience.
- Annoyance (weight 0.04): Annoyance is caused by intrusive monetization like season passes, clunky UI requiring excessive clicks, and long loading times. Minor bugs, unskippable sequences, and toxic player behavior such as emote spam and AFK teammates also irritate players. The overall lack of polish and repetitive quest designs add to the irritation.
- Sadness (weight 0.03): Sadness is felt over the game's decline from a beloved title to a barely playable state, particularly due to the 2.0 update. The loss of community, hard-built decks, and the developers' abandonment evoke a sense of mourning for what the game once was. The use of AI and the end of content updates deepen the sorrow.
- Enthusiasm (weight 0.02): Enthusiasm comes from the game's strategic depth, variety of modes, and balanced deckbuilding. Players appreciate the fair free-to-play model and the fun, tactical gameplay that combines tower defense and card battles. The potential for continued development and the joy of team battles keep players excited.
- Appreciation (weight 0.02): Players appreciate the generous free-to-play economy, fair monetization, and free DLC giveaways. The developers' efforts to balance the game and engage with the community are valued, as is the game's unique art style and strategic depth. The skill-based gameplay without pay-to-win advantages earns praise.
- Nostalgia (weight 0.02): Nostalgia is triggered by memories of playing with friends and enjoying earlier versions of the game, particularly 1.0. Players recall the game's former polish, creative decks, and immersive experiences, contrasting them with the current state. The sense of loss for a game that was once a significant part of their lives is palpable.
- Excitement (weight 0.01): Excitement is generated by the fast-paced, tactical battles and the strategic depth of deckbuilding and real-time unit spawning. The variety of decks, modes, and masters keeps gameplay fresh and thrilling. The addictive nature and competitive challenge contribute to a sense of eager engagement.
- Fun (weight 0.01): Fun is derived from the core gameplay loop, including deep deckbuilding strategy, chaotic 2v2 matches, and quick, satisfying battles. The mix of bright minions, simple combat mechanics, and teamwork creates an enjoyable experience. Players find the game entertaining and engaging, especially when playing with friends.
- Disgust (weight 0.01): Disgust is directed at the developers' use of AI, unbalanced new content, and the game becoming an abandoned cash grab. The community's toxic elements, including trolls and racist conversations, and perceived unfair mana algorithms also repulse players. The removal of features like guilds and the game's resemblance to other franchises add to the revulsion.
- Dissatisfaction (weight 0.01): Dissatisfaction stems from persistent balance issues, grindy progression, and bugs in version 2.0. The 2v2 system, RNG dependence, and removal of free rewards are criticized. Network lag and poor translation quality further detract from the experience.
- Hope (weight 0.01): Hope is expressed for the game's future prosperity, continued growth, and potential improvements. Players wish for localization, better balance, and a return to the game's former charm. Some believe progression is possible and that developers might address issues, allowing them to return.
- Distrust (weight 0.01): Distrust arises from suspicions that matchmaking is manipulated to favor paying players and that hidden algorithms stack decks unfairly. Developers are seen as incompetent, ignoring user opinions and abandoning the game for new projects. The lack of effort to improve server quality and the overpriced shop erode trust.
- Regret (weight 0.01): Regret is felt for missing the game in its prime, spending time on a now-devalued experience, and starting too late to progress without paying. Players regret deleting accounts with collected DLC and lament that a once-favorite free-to-play title was abandoned. The inability to return to the old version deepens this feeling.
- Confusion (weight 0.01): Confusion is caused by unclear game mechanics, such as how to obtain top prizes or play with friends in ranked mode. The confusing UI layout and unexpected opponent advantages (like 18-point minions) puzzle players. Some also wonder why the game has so many negative reviews despite good performance on their systems.
- Addiction (weight 0.01): Addiction is driven by the game's fast, chaotic 'one more round' quality and the depth of strategies. The variety of combinations and quick matches keep players hooked, even when they acknowledge flaws. The gameplay is described as sunflower seeds, making it hard to stop.
- Admiration (weight 0.01): Admiration is felt for the game being made with love, well-balanced, and generously free. The developers' dedication to giving away new content and maintaining regular updates earns respect. Players consider it one of the best games ever made despite its underappreciation.}