Info about Football Manager 27:

Official game description:
Every fan believes they could do it differently. In FM27 belief isn’t a hot take, it’s a story waiting to happen.  
Step into a living, breathing football universe where every decision is yours to make.   
Pick the team. Define your style. Spot what other managers might miss. Maybe you take a chance on the academy prospect. Maybe you sell the star who just doesn’t get your vision.  
Train your team to work as one. Build a tactical blueprint that’s unmistakably yours. Then lead your team out to admiration from the stands as you take your place on the touchline.  
Match day. React to everything the opposition throws at you. Beat their press. Fill the box. And throw the kitchen sink.  
Because footballing history won’t write itself.  
Every decision could be the one to change everything. So chase the vision only you can see.   
Whatever happens, you’ll remember the calls that got you there.  
Football Manager 27. Make The Call. 
What’s new for FM27?
--------------------
Experience a new dimension to squad building with all-new Tactical Effectiveness that measures how well-equipped your players are to deliver your footballing vision, while refreshed training puts even more focus on player and team development.
Exploit the gaps you see in the opposition defence with Tactical Tweaks that deliver a new layer of influence from the touchline.
Experience every fixture as a richer piece of football theatre thanks to upgrades to crowds, stadiums and environments that elevate the stage for your players to perform on.
Sit defenders down with more attacking precision and expression, with flair and individuality taking centre stage to make it more rewarding seeing your tactical planning come to life on the pitch. 
Get lost in the wider football world that exists beyond your club with the return of Cup Draws and Transfer Deadline Day, mirroring the pace and drama of the football calendar.
Flow through game weeks to glory thanks to an intuitive interface that puts key decisions front and centre. However you execute your managerial vision, customisation options mean you can tailor your setup to better suit your style.
And discover much more, including new licensed leagues to test your skills in, upgrades to the 2D Match View, deeper data to power decision-making and more than 1,500 competition updates.

Release date: Nov 10, 2026

Categories: Football Management, Sports Simulation, Management Simulation, Tactical, Career Mode, Strategy, Team Management

Feature scans:
- Steam Deck: score 20; verdict: Seamless with minor UI caveats; summary: The reviews indicate that the game runs natively and almost perfectly on Steam Deck, with strong stability and improved battery life. The main friction comes from minor unresolved UI/scaling issues and some interface quality complaints, but these do not require Proton workarounds, launcher navigation, or other tinkering.

- Hardware Profile:
  - Summary: The game is generally reported to run well on Windows cohorts with under 8GB VRAM, 8-11GB VRAM, and 16GB+ VRAM, with only isolated crashes or optimization caveats. The Windows 12-15GB VRAM cohort is notably negative, citing poor optimization, high GPU utilization, and 1440p scaling or strobing problems.
  - Sample size: 135 (14% coverage)
  - Audience skew: Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
  - Windows <8GB VRAM (positive, 47 reports): Most reports describe smooth operation and no major technical issues, despite a few mentions of occasional crashes and match-engine optimization concerns.
  - Windows 12-15GB VRAM (negative, 36 reports): Reviews consistently report poor optimization, high GPU utilization during matches, and display-scaling or strobing problems at 1440p and above.
  - Windows 8-11GB VRAM (positive, 35 reports): The cohort mostly reports improved responsiveness and rock-solid stability, with isolated frame-rate or resource concerns and a specific international-break crash.
  - Windows 16GB+ VRAM (positive, 16 reports): The available report describes very smooth performance and a generally good technical experience.
  - Caveats: 135 of 951 reviews expose hardware metadata.; Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
Feature extractions:
- Community Price:
  - Community fair range: $35.00 - $45.00
  - Reasoning: Reviewers generally see the game as worthwhile and recommend buying it, but they also describe annual football-manager releases as overpriced and advise waiting for a sale. That combination points to a fair base-game price below premium full-price AAA levels, in the mid-$30s to mid-$40s rather than the highest annual-release price.
- Playtime Metrics:
  - Game completion: N/A
  - Story completion: 45.0h
  - Session length: 0.5h
  - Endgame: 132.0h
  - Reasoning: The first-season report supports a story/campaign completion proxy of about 45 hours for one season. The half-hour anecdote supports a session length of roughly 0.5 hours. The 132-hour report shows continued engagement beyond 132 hours, supporting an endgame estimate of at least 132 hours. Other reports of 78 hours and similar long playtimes corroborate extended play but do not establish a total game-completion time, so gameCompletion is left null. Confidence is moderate because several metrics come from single anecdotes and the management-game structure makes completion ambiguous.
- Time-to-fun:
  - Summary: Players often report the game becomes rewarding after they adapt to the new training and tactical effectiveness systems, while clunky navigation and a crash can block progress. Positive reviews also describe an addictive, 'one more match' quality, indicating some players feel the pull sooner.
  - Stance: Clicks after
  - Anchor: When the new training and tactical effectiveness systems click and goals start to flow
  - Time to anchor: N/A
  - Friction: Clunky, hard-to-read UI; Nested top navigation requiring many clicks; New training and tactical effectiveness systems requiring adaptation; International break crash that halts progression
  - Unlock drivers: Tactical effectiveness mechanic clicks and makes style development easier; Goals start to flow once the tactic clicks; UI overhaul with smoother navigation and fewer clicks
  - Conditions: Player has adapted to the new training and tactical effectiveness systems; Tactical effectiveness mechanic has clicked; Progression is not blocked by the international break crash; Player can tolerate or overlook clunky UI navigation; Player values fewer clicks and quality-of-life improvements
- Player Archetypes:
  - Long-Term Series Veteran (buy)
    - Motivation: Continue long-running management saves and see the series return to form after a skipped edition.
    - Playstyle: Runs multi-season single-player saves, builds squads over time, and compares each release with prior FM/CM editions.
    - Experience: veteran
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: FM addict; long term player of CM/FM
    - Reference games: CM/FM; FM26
  - Anti-Meta Tactical Purist (buy)
    - Motivation: Earn success through tactical understanding and realistic challenge instead of exploitable meta tactics.
    - Playstyle: Uses custom tactics and lower-league saves, studies match details, and avoids copy-paste dominant strategies.
    - Experience: familiar
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Football-Curious Newcomer (buy)
    - Motivation: Learn football management and explore scouting, tactics, and club building from a beginner's starting point.
    - Playstyle: Plays single-player, picks a real team to learn with, and relies on clearer navigation and guidance while discovering management systems.
    - Experience: newcomer
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Unfinished-State Value Skeptic (sale)
    - Motivation: Get a complete, polished, and fairly priced management game rather than paying full price for an unfinished iteration.
    - Playstyle: Waits for patches or sales, compares against prior FM releases, and may use datapacks or older versions while deciding.
    - Experience: familiar
    - Purchase stance: sale
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: FM26; FM24


Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category.
Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews.
What players like:
- UI greatly improved (weight 0.48): The user interface is frequently praised as better, faster, more intuitive, and more modern than in previous games. Reviewers highlight improved navigation, responsiveness, and visual appeal.
- Overall game is good (weight 0.3): A large number of reviewers give a broadly positive assessment, calling the game good, enjoyable, impressive, and well-built. The general sentiment is that the game is a solid and satisfying experience.
- Runs smooth and fast (weight 0.2): Reviewers commonly note that the game runs smoothly, quickly, and without problems. The improved performance and fluidity are frequently mentioned as positives.
- Tactical effectiveness feature praised (weight 0.17): The new tactical effectiveness feature is highlighted as a meaningful and useful addition to gameplay. Reviewers consider it one of the best new mechanics in years.
- Increased difficulty appreciated (weight 0.11): Reviewers welcome the added difficulty, finding it makes the game more enjoyable and challenging. The higher difficulty is considered a positive change.
- Smooth return after FM26 (weight 0.11): Several reviewers frame the game as a solid return to form after the troubled FM26 release. It is described as a big comeback and a much better product than the previous version.
- Feels like proper FM (weight 0.1): A sentiment shared by multiple reviewers is that the game finally feels like a real Football Manager title again. This reflects a restoration of the series' identity.
- Fixed FM26 issues (weight 0.09): Reviewers appreciate that many UI problems and other issues from FM26 have been addressed. The fixes contribute to a more polished experience.
- Improved match engine (weight 0.08): The match engine is described as improved and much better than in previous versions. Reviewers note clear enhancements to match simulation.
- Series back on track (weight 0.08): The game is seen as a return to the right path for the series, with reviewers feeling immersed and hopeful again. It is described as a return to glory.
- Playability up to standard (weight 0.07): Reviewers confirm that the game is playable and meets expectations for playability. It is considered functional and up to standard.

Common complaints:
- Match engine needs major work (weight 0.49): Multiple clusters highlight that the match engine is broken, buggy, or poorly developed, with frequent complaints about offsides, defending, and overall quality. This is a high-frequency issue with specific details across many reviews.
- UI worse than FM24 (weight 0.28): Reviewers consistently compare the UI unfavorably to FM24, citing clunkiness, unnecessary information, and poor layout. The interface is seen as a step backward despite some improvements.
- Numerous bugs and glitches (weight 0.27): Bugs are a common complaint, ranging from small annoyances to game-breaking issues. Players note more bugs than in previous releases and specific problems like offside goals counting.
- Still needs polish and fixes (weight 0.27): Many players feel the game requires minor to moderate polishing, with lingering issues and shortcomings that prevent it from feeling complete. This is a broad sentiment across several clusters.
- Missing features from FM24 (weight 0.21): Several reviewers point out that important features from FM24, such as end-of-season credits, are absent or stripped down. This makes the game feel incomplete compared to its predecessor.
- Tactical effectiveness balancing issues (weight 0.15): The new tactical effectiveness system is hard to grasp and unbalanced, especially for semi-pro teams. Players struggle with its complexity and the need for constant manual adjustments.
- Defending and AI problems (weight 0.14): Defenders often fail to mark, press, or tackle, and AI behavior is seen as weird or ineffective. This contributes to frustration with match outcomes.
- Excessive offside goals (weight 0.09): Multiple clusters mention a ridiculous number of offside calls and goals being ruled out incorrectly, harming the match experience. This is a specific match engine bug.
- Graphics need improvement (weight 0.09): The graphics engine still has flaws, and newgen graphics could be better despite being an improvement. Visual quality is a secondary but noted concern.
- Game not worth full price (weight 0.05): Some reviewers feel the game is overpriced given its issues and lack of innovation, especially when compared to FM24. The value proposition is questioned.
- Shots hitting post too often (weight 0.05): Reviewers note an unrealistic frequency of shots hitting the post, which detracts from realism and enjoyment.
- Transfers are difficult (weight 0.05): A few players find the transfer system not easy or even sucky, indicating frustration with negotiation or player acquisition mechanics.

Gameplay feedback:
- Tactical effectiveness tied to training (weight 0.38): A tactical effectiveness system is a key mechanic that cannot be delegated and is closely tied to the training system. It influences team cohesion and overall performance on the pitch.
- Comprehensive football management simulation (weight 0.36): Players describe a full football management experience covering transfers, tactics, training, youth academy, and club operations. The match engine and database are core to the simulation.
- Reworked match engine (weight 0.29): The match engine has been changed and improved, with tactical changes and player behavior directly affecting match outcomes. It now includes defensive AI, offside rulings, and VAR decisions.
- UI customization and navigation (weight 0.18): The game supports UI skins and plugins for customization, and features updated menus and navigation for accessing information.
- Increased difficulty (weight 0.11): Multiple players note the game is harder than previous iterations, with improved difficulty and a more challenging experience.
- Shuffle Draft mode (weight 0.09): A Shuffle Draft mode is available for quick sessions or competitive multiplayer, adding a new way to play.
- Club management across seasons (weight 0.07): Players can manage a club through league seasons, including developing a lower-league hometown team over multiple seasons.
- Match day experience (weight 0.07): Match day is modeled on the real game, with a match day experience and match simulation including possession and shots.
- Player attributes and development (weight 0.07): Players have individual attributes such as passing, tackling, pace, strength, acceleration, decision-making, and composure. Player ratings and attribute development are part of the game.
- Press conferences and interactions (weight 0.07): The game includes conversations with players, press conferences, and interactions with coaching staff, adding depth to management.
- Modding community support (weight 0.07): The game is moddable and supported by a modding community, enabling custom content and changes.

Performance notes:
- Improved performance over previous installment (weight 0.14): Multiple reviewers report the game runs more smoothly and faster than its predecessor, with lag issues from the older title resolved. Processing and menu speeds are also noted as faster.
- High power consumption and GPU load (weight 0.09): The game places unnecessarily high load on PCs regarding power consumption, with GPU utilization reaching 100% on every match and menu. Limiting frame rate is suggested as a mitigation.
- Runs well on low-end hardware (weight 0.07): Several reviewers note the game performs better on low-end PCs, integrated Radeon 760M graphics, and even massive databases with huge player counts. This suggests decent scalability for less powerful setups.
- Strong stability during play (weight 0.07): Reviewers report overall stability with no crashes, stutters, or performance issues across many seasons. Only occasional rare crashes are mentioned.
- Match lag on high-end hardware (weight 0.05): Reviewers report matches lag on high-end hardware despite low-level graphics settings, indicating poor optimization for the match engine.
- Mac performance and lag issues (weight 0.05): Multiple reviewers report lag and poor performance on Mac, even on high-end M-series chips, suggesting weak Mac optimization.
- Post-patch frame rate drops (weight 0.03): A reviewer reports frame rates falling from a consistent 40-60fps to 20fps in matches after the release patch, suggesting a regression introduced by an update.
- Online game joining crashes (weight 0.03): Joining online games crashes constantly according to one reviewer, pointing to instability in multiplayer connectivity.
- Game hangs on loading screen (weight 0.03): One reviewer reports the game hangs indefinitely on the loading screen, preventing play from starting.
- MacOS security block prevents launch (weight 0.03): On Mac, the game would not open because MacOS flagged it as unsafe and required a manual privacy settings change before it could run.
- 3D match overheats laptops (weight 0.03): Running the 3D match at 60fps causes laptops to reach 90 degrees, showing heavy thermal load from the match engine.
- Longer processing times than older game (weight 0.03): One reviewer found game processing takes much longer than in the older installment, contradicting reports of improved speed.
- Blurry text at 1440p (weight 0.03): Poor resolution scaling at 1440p causes blurry text and menus, hurting readability for players at that resolution.
- Steam Deck battery life doubled (weight 0.03): Battery life on Steam Deck is reported as roughly double that of the previous year's installment, indicating efficiency gains on handheld hardware.
- Strobing light in match engine (weight 0.03): A reviewer reports a strobing light effect in the match engine, which could cause visual discomfort during matches.
- Prior installment had poor optimization (weight 0.03): The previous generation was poorly optimized to the point that one reviewer's computer could not run it, framing current performance gains in contrast.
- FPS lock worse than automatic (weight 0.03): One reviewer notes that locking FPS to 30 or 60 performs worse than the automatic setting, limiting the usefulness of that option.
- Good performance on Linux (weight 0.03): A reviewer reports the game runs well on Linux, indicating solid compatibility on that platform.

Recommendations:
- Strong buy recommendation (weight 0.27): Many reviewers explicitly and unequivocally recommend purchasing the game, often using phrases like 'definitely worth buying', 'worth the money', and 'definitely a buy'. The sentiment is overwhelmingly positive regarding the game's value.
- Great for FM24 fans (weight 0.24): Players who enjoyed FM24 are encouraged to buy FM27, as it is seen as a return to form or an improvement over the disappointing FM26. It is particularly recommended for those who loved FM24.
- Wait for sale or patch (weight 0.18): Some reviewers suggest waiting for a sale or for patches before buying, citing issues with the match engine, interface, or overall polish. They recommend buying later when the game is more stable and possibly discounted.
- Negative reviews and warnings (weight 0.16): A few reviewers do not recommend the game in its current state, citing unfinished content, match engine bugs, or poor value for the price. One even plans to switch to a competitor.
- Recommended for football manager enthusiasts (weight 0.16): The game is highly recommended for fans of the Football Manager series and football management games in general. It appeals to both veterans and newcomers with an interest in football tactics and management.
- Mixed or conditional recommendations (weight 0.13): Several reviewers give conditional recommendations, such as for hardcore fans, those with money, or those ready for a change. Some note it may not be worth it for players still satisfied with FM24 or casual players.
- Try if you skipped last year (weight 0.12): Reviewers encourage players who skipped FM26 to give FM27 a chance, as it is a solid product and a return to form. It is seen as a title that can win back those who left the series.
- Positive but not flawless (weight 0.1): While many recommend the game, some acknowledge it has issues and needs balancing or bug fixes to reach its full potential. They still give a positive review but note areas for improvement.
- Comparison with older installments (weight 0.1): Reviewers compare FM27 to older versions, with some saying it is on par with or better than previous installments, while others believe FM24 is still superior. The game is seen as a step in the right direction.
- Good for newcomers or returning players (weight 0.08): The game is recommended for newcomers with a genuine interest in football management, as well as for players who return every few versions. It provides a solid foundation and is accessible.
- Potential with patches or mods (weight 0.08): Reviewers believe the game could surpass FM24 with a few tweaks to the match engine or with mods. It is seen as having a solid foundation that needs balancing and bug fixing to be brilliant.
- Tactical and setup tips (weight 0.07): Reviewers share specific gameplay tips, such as setting match speed to key highlights, configuring formations and instructions, and trying a 4-3-3 DM with short passing. These suggestions aim to enhance the experience.
- Use mods for better experience (weight 0.07): Some reviewers recommend using mods to improve the game, with one noting that mods already available make it an absolute recommendation. Another suggests getting mods from specific sources to truly enjoy the game.
- Engaging and addictive gameplay (weight 0.05): Reviewers mention the game is very engaging, with one joking that it risks family life and sleep. Another cannot wait to play for over 1000 hours, indicating strong replayability.
- Suitable for hardcore fans (weight 0.05): The game is particularly recommended for hardcore Football Manager fans who have money and are dedicated to the series. Veterans will spend many hours despite some lacking dataset detail.
- Concerns about developer treatment (weight 0.05): One reviewer gives a negative recommendation due to the developer's treatment of FM26 buyers. Another advises ignoring paid shills, indicating distrust in some positive reviews.
- UI and visual considerations (weight 0.05): Some reviewers mention that the new UI may take time to get used to, and one notes that if visuals matter, consider picking it up. The interface is a point of contention for some.
- Regret or skip for now (weight 0.05): A few reviewers express regret over pre-ordering or recommend skipping the game for now. These negative sentiments are in the minority but highlight dissatisfaction.
- Recommended after trial (weight 0.03): One reviewer was convinced to buy thanks to the free trial, indicating that trying the game can help undecided players. This suggests the trial is effective in showcasing the game's strengths.

Other player notes:
- Better than FM26 (weight 0.93): The game is widely seen as a major improvement over Football Manager 26, with many calling it a return to form or the game FM26 should have been. It fixes past mistakes and delivers a more polished experience.
- Favorable comparison to FM24 (weight 0.74): Many reviewers compare the game favorably to Football Manager 2024, considering it a proper successor or an upgraded version. Some feel it merges the best features of FM24 and FM26.
- Improvement over last year (weight 0.38): Reviewers consistently describe the game as a significant upgrade over the previous installment, with some calling it a massive jump forward. It is seen as a clear step up.
- Not as good as FM24 (weight 0.17): Some reviewers feel the game falls short of FM24, citing missing features or that it is not yet at that level. They consider FM24 superior in some aspects.
- Free trial available (weight 0.11): A free trial or demo, such as a 5-day preview, is available before release, allowing players to try the game. This is seen as a positive feature.
- Paid in-game editor (weight 0.1): The in-game editor is monetized as a separate paid add-on that must be repurchased with each yearly release. This is a point of criticism for some reviewers.
- UI compared to FM24 (weight 0.09): Opinions on the UI are split, with some finding it worse and outdated compared to FM24, while others see it as better. The sidebar design is a point of contention.
- Active modding community (weight 0.09): The modding community is active and appreciated, with mods bringing the game to another level. Reviewers highlight its importance in making the game great.
- Skipped FM26 (weight 0.08): Some reviewers skipped FM26 entirely and are moving from FM24 to this game. They cannot compare it to FM26 but are satisfied with the current version.
- Future updates expected (weight 0.07): Reviewers expect future updates to further improve the game, indicating confidence in the developers' ongoing support. This is seen as a positive outlook.
- Mixed vs FM24 and FM26 (weight 0.06): A few reviewers compare the game to both FM24 and FM26, finding it better than FM26 but still worse than FM24. They see it as a step forward but not a full revolution.

Emotions:
- Satisfaction (weight 0.39): Players feel satisfied because the game is a significant improvement over FM26, with a smoother and more logical UI, better performance, and a return to core Football Manager immersion. Tactical depth, improved match engine, and meaningful training make gradual progress and hard-fought victories feel rewarding.
- Frustration (weight 0.39): Frustration stems from persistent bugs, a broken match engine with unrealistic defending and offside calls, and a punishing tactical effectiveness system that makes winning difficult. UI navigation remains clunky, injuries are frequent, and features like the in-game editor are paywalled, while online play and optimization issues add to the annoyance.
- Disappointment (weight 0.3): Players are disappointed by the match engine being worse than previous installments, with stiff animations, poor defending, and unrealistic results, despite other improvements. Missing features, a messy UI, and recurring unresolved issues like wage inflation and transfer market problems make the game feel unfinished and not worth the price.
- Enjoyment (weight 0.17): Enjoyment comes from the detailed tactical approach, improved match engine, and UI that make watching matches fun and tactical changes visibly impactful. The game offers a challenging but fair experience with a rewarding 'one more game' feeling, especially for those who appreciate depth and realism.
- Excitement (weight 0.11): Excitement is driven by the new tactical effectiveness system and in-match instructions that add challenge and immersion, rewarding tactical knowledge over meta tactics. The return of the addictive 'just one more match' feeling and the polished, responsive UI make players eager to dive into long saves.
- Annoyance (weight 0.1): Annoyance is caused by UI glitches, forced micro-management of training, and defensive issues like broken AI and excessive blocked shots or VAR highlights. Bugs such as loan recall problems, outdated player ratings, and difficulty selling high-wage players further irritate players.
- Love (weight 0.07): Love for the game arises from seeing tactical ideas come to life with real-time adjustments and a more immersive tactical experience. Improved UI, match engine, and training, along with the addictive nature of managing a club and creating unique stories, deepen players' affection for the series.
- Enthusiasm (weight 0.07): Enthusiasm is fueled by the game feeling like a proper return to form, with meaningful training, improved UI, and greater challenge. The depth, living football world, and polished gameplay encourage players to buy and invest time, especially with mod support enhancing the experience.
- Relief (weight 0.07): Relief comes from the game being a massive improvement over the disastrous FM26, with a clean and legible UI, better performance on low-end PCs, and a return to the classic Football Manager feel. Fixing UI issues with themes or mods also alleviates frustration.
- Appreciation (weight 0.06): Appreciation is shown for the developers taking feedback seriously and improving the game, with an accessible UI, tactical effectiveness, and training systems that add needed depth. The default theme, fast loading, and realistic managerial thinking are also valued.
- Optimism (weight 0.04): Optimism stems from noticeable improvements in the game engine and interface, with the belief that minor tweaks could make it one of the best in the series. The series feels like it is recovering, and the strong match day experience and fixable problems bode well for the future.
- Hope (weight 0.04): Hope is based on the series returning to the right path, with renewed passion from developers and a game that restored faith after a disappointing previous installment. Players believe bugs will be fixed and mods will enhance the experience, winning back those who left.
- Anger (weight 0.04): Anger is provoked by the game requiring paywalled mods to be fixed, a buggy release with no match engine update, and tactics barely mattering. Infuriating moments like dominating for 75 minutes only to concede in the 89th minute, and the engine being broken yet released, fuel rage.
- Addiction (weight 0.04): Addiction is driven by the core appeal of playing 'just one more match' until morning, with realistic match days and accurate player data. The game's return to form and engaging loop keep players hooked despite its flaws.
- Immersion (weight 0.04): Immersion is created by a more tactile sense of management, easy-to-navigate UI, and a living football world through leagues screens and news items. Players feel like a real manager adjusting tactics and become absorbed in squad management, losing track of time.
- Dissatisfaction (weight 0.03): Dissatisfaction arises from remaining bad parts, such as a poor database, unattractive graphics, and excessive realism that makes the game less fun. Tactical adaptation is too hard, and unrealistic transfers further detract from the experience.
- Liking (weight 0.03): Liking is due to the game being much better than the previous version, with a faster interface, improved visuals, and successful changes. Features like the 'Continue Flow' option and overall moddability enhance the experience.
- Fun (weight 0.02): Fun comes from enjoyable gameplay despite match engine problems, with managing a mid-table team like Shrewsbury and the unpredictability of results. The game is better than FM26 and still provides lots of fun.
- Happiness (weight 0.02): Happiness is felt from having Football Manager back and being hooked again, especially after getting mods and starting a new save. The game feels like a combination of FM24 and FM26, with UI updates and a harder challenge that exceeds previous experiences.
- Nostalgia (weight 0.02): Nostalgia is triggered by reminders of learning the game in 2005, missing old things from FM24, and recalling classic editions. The return of features like cup draws and deadline day, along with retro skins and mods, recreate beloved memories.}