Info about Survivor's Notes:

Official game description:
Survivor's Notes
----------------
Survivor's Notes is a zombie survival FMV. Players will take on the roles of both the male and female protagonists simultaneously, advancing different story branches through choices and various quick-time events during gameplay, and ultimately unlocking distinct endings based on their decisions.
This is not a story about "how the apocalypse destroys the world", but a tale of how humans choose to believe, take responsibility, and make sacrifices in the face of despair.
It does not depict how heroes conquer disasters, but how ordinary people, without divine intervention or retreat, shoulder the cost of saving the world with reason, courage, and sacrifice.
When the world is redeemed, the deeds of salvation are erased. What truly remains is only the possibility for the continuation of human civilization.
This is a work dedicated to "the survivors".
It is also a post-apocalyptic fable about memory, trust, and human dignity.
Story Background
----------------
In 2026, a sudden global zombie apocalypse swept across the world, pushing human civilization to the brink of collapse within days.
No one knows the true origin of the disaster, leaving only countless rewritten lives and vanished names in its wake.
Ji Xingchuan, a cartoonist, has been having recurring dreams of the same post-apocalyptic world for a year. He adapted these dreams into a serialized manga _Notes of the Survivor_, which unexpectedly became a hit. However, the manga abruptly ceased publication the moment the story reached the "white light on the rooftop"—because the dreams began to overlap with reality.
At the same time, Bai Yuan, a special forces soldier from the post-apocalyptic future of 2033, travels back to 2026, bearing the only chance to save the world. She must find the source of the disaster before the truth spirals completely out of control, nipping humanity’s doomed fate in the bud at its unformed singularity. She knows that once the mission succeeds, both she and the entire post-apocalyptic future will cease to exist.
When "an ordinary person who dreams of the apocalypse" meets "a survivor from the apocalypse", time, memory, and fate begin to intertwine. They pursue the truth in the collapsing city, lose companions and shatter their beliefs through countless choices, and gradually draw closer to the deliberately buried answer.
In the end, to set the world back on track, some choose to be forgotten, while others continue to live with unspeakable losses.
The world is saved.
But those who saved it are never remembered by the world.
Product Features
----------------
Immersive Experience: Third-person perspective that stays anchored to the protagonist’s viewpoint throughout. See through their eyes, hear with their ears, and feel their racing heartbeat for unrelenting oppressive tension from start to finish.
Multiple Protagonists: Witness the full scope of the story through the distinct perspectives of the male and female leads.
Player Choice: Different decisions drive the narrative down divergent paths.
Rich Storyline: An expansive plot intertwined with complex character relationships. The protagonists gradually uncover the truth behind all incidents amid constant plot twists.
Character Introductions
-----------------------

Release date: Sep 11, 2026

Categories: FMV (Full-Motion Video), Interactive Movie, Choice-based Narrative, Multiple Endings, Quick-Time Events, Zombie Survival, Post-apocalyptic, AI-generated Visuals


- Hardware Profile: No data
Feature extractions:
- Community Price: No data
- Playtime Metrics:
  - Game completion: 11.7h
  - Story completion: N/A
  - Session length: 1.0h
  - Endgame: N/A
  - Reasoning: The 700-minute total playthrough quote directly supports a full game completion estimate of about 11.7 hours. The one-hour intermittent play quote supports a session-length estimate of about 1 hour. The ten-chapter/branch quote confirms substantial content but does not give a separate main-story-only duration or an endgame duration, so storyCompletion and endgame are null.
- Time-to-fun:
  - Summary: Players consistently report being hooked right away by the AI apocalypse short-drama style, high production quality, and romance/protection premise. There is no evidence of early friction or a delayed click.
  - Stance: Fun immediately
  - Anchor: N/A
  - Time to anchor: N/A
  - Friction: N/A
  - Unlock drivers: N/A
  - Conditions: Enjoyment is linked to the AI apocalypse short-drama presentation.; The manga artist's dream overlapping with reality premise draws players in.; Apocalyptic protection and pure-romance content increases engagement.
- Player Archetypes:
  - AI FMV First-Timer Tech Novelty Seeker (buy)
    - Motivation: Curiosity about a new AI-driven interactive film format and the novelty of the experience
    - Playstyle: Passive first run focused on absorbing the AI visuals and branching video, with low prior expectations
    - Experience: newcomer
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: AI short drama viewer; first-time AI FMV player
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Post-Apocalypse Sci-Fi Mystery Lore Hunter (buy)
    - Motivation: Immersion in a post-apocalyptic sci-fi mystery where clue-gathering and choices shape the ending
    - Playstyle: Methodical, choice-driven play with attention to clues, branches and multiple endings
    - Experience: familiar
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: apocalypse survival game enthusiast; sci-fi mystery enthusiast
    - Reference games: N/A
  - AI Production Quality Skeptic and FMV Comparer (sale)
    - Motivation: Assessing how far AI-generated FMV can match or surpass live-action FMV production
    - Playstyle: Critical, comparison-oriented observation of visuals, camerawork and production values while playing
    - Experience: familiar
    - Purchase stance: sale
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: N/A


Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category.
Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews.
What players like:
- Post-apocalyptic atmosphere strong (weight 0.56): The apocalyptic wasteland atmosphere is effectively rendered, delivering a strong and oppressive post-apocalyptic feel. The setting and background are described as grand and well-done.
- Dual protagonist narrative praised (weight 0.51): Players consistently highlight the dual male and female protagonist setup as a standout feature, enriching the story through complementary perspectives. The dual-line narrative is described as clever, engaging, and well-executed.
- Rich content volume (weight 0.36): The game offers a lot of content, with ten chapters and multiple branches and endings providing substantial playtime. Players note the content is very rich and unexpectedly large.
- Visual quality impressive (weight 0.28): The game's visual presentation is generally well-received, with many noting high quality and good visual experience. The visuals are considered good overall.
- Suspense from perspective switching (weight 0.25): Switching between dual protagonists creates strong suspense and high pressure, adding novelty to the experience. This narrative mechanic is frequently praised for its tension-building effect.
- Choices affect story endings (weight 0.25): Different choices lead to different plots and endings, making multiple playthroughs worthwhile. Players appreciate the branching narrative and its impact on the storyline.
- Story acceptable but not outstanding (weight 0.25): The story content is generally okay or acceptable, but not particularly remarkable. Some players find it decent without being exceptional.
- Short drama format appealing (weight 0.22): The game works well as a short drama, with an interesting watchable quality. It provides a sense of participation similar to being the protagonist of a short drama.
- Interesting setting and design (weight 0.22): The game's setting is very interesting, with a story setting that captivates players. The dual-protagonist gameplay design is also noted as interesting.
- AI-made but acceptable quality (weight 0.21): Despite being AI-made, the game's quality is still okay and acceptable. Players acknowledge the AI origins but find it decent.
- AI-generated scenes effective (weight 0.19): AI generation enables large scenes that low-budget live-action cannot achieve, and these AI-generated visuals look surprisingly decent and atmospheric. This technology allows for themes and scenes otherwise limited by cost.
- Many plot twists (weight 0.19): The plot features layer upon layer of twists, providing many surprising turns. This keeps the story engaging and unpredictable.
- AI with human voice acting (weight 0.14): The combination of AI-generated visuals and real human voice acting delivers a strong emotional experience. All AI components—visuals, story, and voice—are noted for their integration.
- Novel experience overall (weight 0.13): The game provides a novel experience, standing out from typical offerings. Players find it fresh and interesting.
- Zombie FMV genre novel (weight 0.12): The zombie FMV genre feels new and relatively novel to players. It offers a fresh take on the zombie theme.

Common complaints:
- Strong AI-generated feel (weight 0.97): Multiple reviewers note that the AI-generated content is too obvious, making the game feel artificial. This is a widespread criticism affecting immersion.
- Gameplay lacks depth and innovation (weight 0.4): Reviewers feel the gameplay has no breakthroughs, with limited decision-making and low interactivity. It is described as classic but lacking surprises.
- Story is average and clichéd (weight 0.4): The story is considered ordinary with unoriginal twists and a clichéd doomsday zombie theme. It lacks highlights and polish.
- Poor logic and unreasonable plot (weight 0.36): Some logic is flawed, and there are unreasonable plot points, such as a child using a gun or characters making illogical decisions. This affects story coherence.
- Visual inconsistency and jarring art style (weight 0.31): The art style suddenly changes in a jarring way, and visuals are not very realistic. AI assets show visible traces, breaking immersion.
- Technical bugs and usability problems (weight 0.29): There are numerous bugs, including the inability to exit the game and a black screen when pausing. These issues hinder the overall experience.
- Blurry visuals and low resolution (weight 0.27): Some scenes are blurry, and the resolution is around 720p, leading to unclear graphics. This detracts from the visual experience.
- QTE issues and sudden prompts (weight 0.23): QTE button prompts are too sudden, and the interaction could be improved. Some QTEs require continuous clicking, which may frustrate players.
- Limited player choice and impact (weight 0.23): Players have very limited ability to make decisions, and many options presented have little impact on the story. This reduces replay value and engagement.
- Preference for live-action over AI (weight 0.22): Reviewers prefer live-action performances and find the AI-generated visuals lacking. The AI feel is too heavy and breaks immersion.
- Character actions feel unnatural (weight 0.22): Characters occasionally do things no normal human would, and close-up visuals can look plastic. This adds to the artificial feel.
- Insufficient polishing and immature tech (weight 0.22): The game could use more polishing, and the technology feels immature. There are some flaws that detract from the overall quality.
- Short game length and low replayability (weight 0.13): The game time is very short, and there is no reason to replay. This limits value for players.
- AI detail errors in scenes (weight 0.13): AI detail errors occur in multiplayer scenes, such as background characters facing away. These errors break immersion.
- Camera work and dynamic performance issues (weight 0.12): Some camera work is odd, and the dynamic performance looks fake. This affects the cinematic experience.
- Translation and language issues (weight 0.08): The translation is bad, with much content still in English or other languages, making the story hard to understand. This is a significant barrier.
- Doors too fragile to block zombies (weight 0.07): Doors are too fragile and cannot block zombies effectively. This is a gameplay flaw.
- Blood effects lack bullet holes (weight 0.07): Blood sprays but no bullet holes appear on zombies, breaking immersion. This is a minor visual detail issue.
- Female protagonist blade-swinging issues (weight 0.07): The female protagonist's blade-swinging scenes seem to have issues, possibly with animation or logic. This is a specific complaint.
- Lack of fan service (weight 0.06): Some players expect fan service but find none. This is a minor complaint.

Gameplay feedback:
- Branching narrative multiple endings (weight 0.61): Players highlight a branching storyline with multiple endings, where choices shape the story outcomes across ten chapters. This is a core feature that drives replayability and narrative engagement.
- Dual protagonist perspective switching (weight 0.56): The game features two distinct protagonists and allows switching between their perspectives, offering dual narrative lines. This structure lets players experience the story from both sides.
- Apocalyptic zombie setting (weight 0.38): The story is set in a post-apocalyptic zombie world, often described as a doomsday scenario. This setting provides the backdrop for survival and conflict.
- Interactive AI movie game (weight 0.33): Many reviewers categorize the game as an AI-driven interactive movie where choices influence the narrative. It blends film-like presentation with game mechanics.
- QTE quick time events (weight 0.32): Quick time events (QTEs) are a prominent mechanic, especially during zombie attacks. Players must react quickly to prompts to succeed.
- Full-motion video FMV game (weight 0.28): The game is a full-motion video (FMV) experience, using live-action footage. Some specifically note the zombie FMV genre.
- Survival gameplay mechanics (weight 0.19): Players engage in survival-type gameplay, often involving apocalyptic survival and strategic decision-making. This adds tension and resource management.
- AI-generated visuals and voice (weight 0.14): The game utilizes AI-generated visuals, story, and voice acting, which some describe as an all-AI production. This is a notable technical aspect.
- Manga artist predicting future (weight 0.13): Players take on the role of a manga artist who can predict the future. This unique premise ties into the narrative and choice mechanics.
- Clue gathering and piecing (weight 0.12): The game involves piecing together clues and gathering information. This investigative element adds depth to the interactive experience.

Performance notes:
- Black screen when pausing (weight 0.09): Players report that pressing the spacebar to pause the game causes the screen to go black, which disrupts gameplay.
- Stable performance with effects (weight 0.08): Even in later stages with full screen effects, the game maintains stable performance.
- Low resolution around 720p (weight 0.08): The game's resolution is reportedly around 720p, which may appear blurry on higher-resolution displays.
- Average optimization (weight 0.08): Opinions suggest the game's optimization is neither particularly good nor bad, but average.

Recommendations:
- Appeals to Story-Focused Players (weight 0.19): The game is recommended for those who enjoy narrative and immersion. Viewer-type players who prefer story over action will appreciate it.
- Worth Buying on Sale (weight 0.13): Players suggest purchasing the game at a discount to try it out. The price is considered fair for the experience.
- Worth Trying (weight 0.12): Overall, the game is worth trying, especially if you enjoy interactive dramas. It offers a unique experience.
- Not Recommended Due to AI Feel (weight 0.08): The game is not recommended because it feels overwhelmingly AI-generated. This detracts from the overall experience for some players.
- Fastest Refund Requested (weight 0.08): Some players wanted to refund the game as quickly as possible. This indicates strong dissatisfaction with the purchase.
- Requires Good English Proficiency (weight 0.08): Players with strong English skills can follow the story, but those with poor English may struggle. The game's narrative is heavily text-based.
- Must-Buy for Interactive Movie Fans (weight 0.08): Fans of interactive movie games should consider this a must-buy. It delivers a cinematic and engaging experience.
- May Feel Bland for Action Seekers (weight 0.07): Players looking for action or complex mechanics might find the game boring. It focuses more on story and atmosphere.
- Ideal for Apocalyptic Zombie Fans (weight 0.07): Fans of apocalyptic zombies and interactive movies will enjoy this game. It combines horror elements with cinematic storytelling.
- Worth Multiple Playthroughs (weight 0.07): The game encourages multiple playthroughs to see different outcomes. Players find replay value in exploring various story branches.
- Recommended for Fans of The Invisible Guardian (weight 0.07): If you enjoyed The Invisible Guardian, this game is likely to appeal to you. It shares similar themes and gameplay style.
- Treat as Mindless Fun (weight 0.07): The game is best enjoyed as a mindless fun experience. Don't expect deep mechanics or challenging gameplay.
- Good for Streaming While Lying Down (weight 0.07): The game is suitable for playing via streaming services while relaxing. Its slow pace and story focus make it ideal for casual sessions.
- Suitable for Survival Game Fans (weight 0.07): Players who enjoy survival games will find this title appealing. It incorporates survival elements within an interactive drama framework.

Other player notes:
- Game is AI-generated (weight 0.75): Multiple clusters consistently describe the game as AI-made, using AI generation for visuals and scenes. It is characterized as an all-AI interactive drama or film-game.
- Compared to short dramas (weight 0.38): Reviewers frequently compare the experience to watching short dramas, noting it feels more like a well-made short drama than a traditional game. Comparisons are also made to AI short dramas on Douyin and apocalypse-themed short dramas.
- Playable apocalypse short drama (weight 0.26): The game is described as a playable take on the reborn-in-the-apocalypse short drama formula and a rare full-motion video apocalypse zombie title. It is also compared to apocalypse short dramas in general.
- AI advantages over live-action (weight 0.24): AI production is noted to enable more spectacular special effects and scenes that real filming cannot achieve due to cost or practical limits. It also costs less to make and can reach a wider audience than live-action FMV.
- Not expensive price point (weight 0.23): Several reviewers mention that the launch price is not expensive, making it accessible. This is often noted alongside the amount of content provided.
- Better than expected quality (weight 0.22): Some reviewers, including a Resident Evil veteran, found the game better than expected. It is described as the peak of current AI interactive movie games and better than AI short dramas.
- AI game industry impact (weight 0.18): AI is seen as impacting the film-game industry, with this game being an attempt in the AI film-game field. The reviewer expects more AI-produced games in the future.
- Story premise and characters (weight 0.17): The story involves a manga artist foreseeing disaster and a female colonel returning from the future, with two timelines expected to connect. Characters include Bai Yuan and Ji Xingchuan.
- AI enables higher theme ceiling (weight 0.17): AI games are noted to have a higher theme ceiling and can fit more gameplay. This allows for more diverse content in the interactive drama genre.
- Comparisons to other media (weight 0.16): Reviewers compare the game to Terminator and time-travel zombie apocalypse movies, and the character Bai Yuan to the classic title My Robot Girlfriend. It also reminds one of a competitor known for delays.
- Acceptable flaws and average (weight 0.16): Some reviewers find the game has acceptable flaws and is average compared to other apocalyptic-themed games. The story is deemed acceptable.
- Half-finished impression (weight 0.16): Some reviewers feel it is a half-finished game, while others perceive it as a low-cost skin-deep interactive game initially. The launch content is acceptable as is for some.
- Dynamic film-game with choices (weight 0.13): It is better viewed as a long-form dynamic film-game with branch choices, offering openness and player agency. Some compare it to sandbox games for degree of openness.
- Multiple endings and achievements (weight 0.12): The game tracks multiple endings and achievements for completion, with each ending featuring an ending story broadcast. This adds replay value for completionists.
- Common AI game problems (weight 0.12): Camera work and dynamic performance are noted as common problems with AI games. Some feel the play experience feels odd compared to live-action video games.
- Horror and ruins setting (weight 0.1): The game has a horror tag and includes a ruins setting. This adds to the apocalyptic atmosphere.
- Incomplete translation issues (weight 0.07): One reviewer points out that the game's translation is incomplete, with parts remaining in English or other languages. This affects the overall experience for non-native speakers.
- Original soundtrack with many pieces (weight 0.07): The soundtrack contains over ninety original pieces, which is a notable feature. This contributes to the overall production value.
- Story-only mode delayed (weight 0.06): The story-only mode was initially unavailable but scheduled to open later. This feature was anticipated by some players.

Emotions:
- Satisfaction (weight 0.13): Players derive satisfaction from the game's large-scale production with no dull moments, well-paced story, and strong apocalyptic atmosphere. The dual-protagonist perspective, choice-driven endings, and generous amount of content make it a cost-effective and engaging short drama experience.
- Disappointment (weight 0.12): Disappointment stems from limited player choice and the heavy AI production, which makes zombie horde scenes less impressive and character close-ups feel plastic. Other issues include lack of interactivity, unpolished script, abrupt twists, and poor optimization.
- Immersion (weight 0.08): Players feel immersed due to the successfully created apocalyptic pressure, enhanced by soundtrack and voice acting. The dual narrative, full-motion video presentation, and well-calibrated horror contribute to a multi-perspective immersive experience.
- Surprise (weight 0.06): Surprise arises from the game quality exceeding expectations, especially given its AI-made nature. Elements like the well-crafted script, time paradox setting, hidden Easter egg, and novel perspective switching catch players off guard.
- Excitement (weight 0.05): Excitement is driven by the power fantasy setting, cool female lead, and the participatory short-drama format. Tense visuals, QTE moments, dual protagonist perspective switching, and a compelling sci-fi suspense apocalyptic survival premise keep players thrilled.
- Interest (weight 0.05): Players are interested in the apocalypse survival theme, dual-protagonist gameplay design, and novel zombie FMV experience. The affordable price, multiple ending branches, and thought-provoking worldview and character development encourage replay.
- Frustration (weight 0.05): Frustration results from bad translation making the story hard to understand, sudden QTE button prompts, and numerous bugs that prevent exiting or selecting story progress. Other issues include unblockable doors, hidden key choice prompts, and incoherent scenes with low choice level.
- Engagement (weight 0.04): Engagement is fostered by dual perspective switching, suspense, and an innovative dual protagonist apocalypse setting. The dense QTE and information gap setting keep players actively involved.
- Admiration (weight 0.02): Players admire the well-acted female colonel character, Bai Yuan's cool appearance and clean movements, and the dual-line story with its foreshadowing.
- Tension (weight 0.02): Tension is created by the game's oppressive apocalyptic setting, survival gameplay, and tense visuals. Every choice and QTE reaction makes players nervous.
- Mild disappointment (weight 0.02): Mild disappointment comes from AI visuals occasionally being jarring in complex scenes, breaking immersion, and not matching live-action quality. The lack of realistic feeling from live actors and average story also contribute.
- Appreciation (weight 0.02): Appreciation is felt for the story's portrayal of ordinary people facing fate with courage, impactful fight scenes and zombies, and the well-executed dual protagonist storyline with branching endings.
- Addiction (weight 0.02): Players find the game addictive due to its AI apocalyptic short drama format and engaging gameplay that keeps them coming back.
- Enjoyment (weight 0.02): Enjoyment is derived from the fun and engaging gameplay, interesting theme, and the engaging Peacock team, all wrapped in a doomsday zombie AI movie-game.
- Acceptance (weight 0.02): Players accept the game's flaws, such as odd-looking graphics, because they are tolerable given the price and overall experience.
- Annoyance (weight 0.01): Annoyance is caused by the inconvenience of taking screenshots due to a black screen on pause and the high number of QTEs.
- Anticipation (weight 0.01): Players anticipate the apocalyptic survival setting with full-motion video and dual protagonists, and the post-apocalyptic suspense atmosphere appeals to story lovers.
- Nervousness (weight 0.01): Nervousness arises from QTE segments that make hands sweat despite the low difficulty.
- Impressed (weight 0.01): Players are impressed by the time-travel apocalyptic story with dual protagonists, which stands out as a unique narrative.
- Surprised (weight 0.01): Players are surprised that the story was far more impactful than expected from an all-AI production.}