Super Hipster Lumberjack Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-06-03
  • Decent platformer with good design
  • Fun and enjoyable game
  • Good value for the price
  • Challenging and rewarding gameplay
  • Poor music quality
  • Bad controls and physics
Super Hipster Lumberjack header

Emotions

Archetypes

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

  • -

    No data available

Review evidence

Why players say this

Steam review verdict

A sharp, rewarding platformer with clever level design and great value that stumbles with clunky controls, floaty physics, and forgettable music despite its fun, challenging core.

What players like

Decent platformer with good design: The game is praised as a decent platformer with straightforward and enjoyable gameplay. The level design and graphics are also noted as positive aspects.

Fun and enjoyable game: Many players find the game to be fun and enjoyable, making it a good choice for passing time and providing a pleasant experience.

Good value for the price: Players feel that the game offers good value for its price, often mentioning that it is worth the cost and provides more entertainment than expected.

Challenging and rewarding gameplay: The game offers a significant challenge that is enjoyable for skilled players and veterans. The difficulty is consistent and fair, providing a rewarding experience.

Positive technical aspects: The game features good physics, intuitive gameplay, and solid controls. The save feature and controller support are also appreciated by players.

Common complaints

Poor music quality: The music in the game is widely criticized for being annoying, repetitive, and of low quality. Many players find it dull and some even describe it as ear-rapey.

Bad controls and physics: Players report that the controls are imprecise, slippery, and unresponsive. The physics engine is also criticized for feeling clunky and not working properly.

Long levels without checkpoints: Several levels are criticized for being too long and difficult without any checkpoints. This can make the game frustrating and tedious.

Lack of polish and visual appeal: The game is described as lacking polish, with bland graphics, and few animations. The art style is criticized for being generic and unappealing.

Basic and poor level design: The level design is described as basic, uninspired, and sometimes unfair. Some levels feel like practice assignments rather than well-designed challenges.

Gameplay and performance

Physics-based challenging gameplay: The gameplay is physics-based and momentum-driven, offering a challenging experience that progressively increases in difficulty.

Platformer with Unity Engine: The game is a platformer built using the Unity Engine, featuring generic 3D blocks and platforming mechanics.

Old school platformer mechanics: The game features straightforward, old school side-scrolling platformer gameplay with cool mechanics and indie platformer elements.

Few checkpoints in levels: The game has long levels with few or no checkpoints, making it more challenging and sometimes frustrating.

Black pixels cause death: Touching black pixels or tiles causes instant death, adding to the game's difficulty.

Game crashes on load: The game frequently crashes when attempting to load saved games or when transitioning between levels. This issue is widespread and significantly impacts the gameplay experience.

Floors and platforms disappear: There are issues with the game's environment where floors and platforms disappear, causing gameplay disruptions. This bug affects the game's playability and needs attention.

Game runs smoothly: The game is noted for its smooth performance and ease of running on various systems. Players have reported few issues with the game's basic functionality.

Recommendations

Worth the low price: Many players find the game worth its low price, often mentioning it is worth the cost of around 50 cents to a dollar.

Recommended for various gamers: The game is recommended for a wide range of players, including those who enjoy challenges, fans of specific series, and both newer gamers and veterans.

Support indie developers: Some players suggest buying the game to support the indie developer behind it.

Fun and simple time-waster: The game is described as a fun and simple way to pass the time, suitable for casual play.

Potential for speedrunning: Some players are interested in the game for its speedrunning potential.

Buying context

Community fair range: $0.10 - $0.50.

Game completion: 2.5h.

Story completion: 2.5h.

Session length: 1.0h.

The game initially feels like a basic tutorial result but can become addictive after overcoming early frustrations and repetitive deaths.

Reported time to anchor: 30m.

Friction: Lack of originality; Repetitive music; Basic graphics; Unfair platforming; Poor physics engine; No controller support.

Player profiles

Platformer Enthusiast: Engages with the game's mechanics and enjoys the challenge of platforming. Motivation: Enjoyment of challenging platformer gameplay. Stance: buy.

Critical Developer: Analyzes game mechanics and design critically. Motivation: Assessment of game quality and potential. Stance: no buy.

Casual Speedrunner: Enjoys exploring game mechanics and finding unique ways to play. Motivation: Enjoyment of unique gameplay experiences and speedrunning potential. Stance: sale.

Platform notes

Steam Deck: The game has received mixed reviews with significant criticisms focused on game design and mechanics, as well as audio and visual issues. However, there are also positive aspects such as fair pricing, good graphics, and easy controller support. The overall experience seems to be marred by several technical and design flaws that need addressing.