Info about Hearthlands:

Official game description:
Hearthlands is a medieval/fantasy city-building real time strategy game in which you take a role of a king in a procedurally generated world. You can not control your subjects directly; instead you focus on city-building, resource management, diplomacy, magic and other things a typical king deals with on a daily basis.
The game is very flexible: you can build a powerful realm and rule the lands with an iron grip, or establish a humble fishermen village. Or create a trading empire. Or found a small, but well-defended outpost or a raider's camp. Or become a host of a wizard's manor.
All characters, from a humble hauler to a powerful wizard have their own minds and behavior patterns. Sometimes it is interesting just to watch people scurry about minding their own business.
Features:
---------
*   Build a medieval city;
*   Play the game the way you like it: experiment with sandbox settings or play a campaign mode (ex. Polish localization);
*   Keep your people happy by providing them with necessary resources and services;
*   Gather resources, produce goods and build industries;
*   See reports and tune up your economy;
*   Build an army and protect your city from monsters and invasions;
*   Trade and conduct diplomacy with neighbouring realms, or go to war with them;
*   Research technologies and cast spells;
*   Challenge yourself by going after one of the many achievements.

Release date: Apr 28, 2017

Categories: City Builder, Real-time Strategy, Economic Simulation, Indirect Control Gameplay, Colony Simulation, Diplomacy, Procedurally Generated Maps, Medieval Setting

Feature scans:
- Proton/Linux: score 15; verdict: Works well on Linux; summary: The filtered reviews are overwhelmingly positive for Linux. Users report that the game launches and runs well on Linux, including on Intel integrated graphics and in Early Access builds, and some explicitly praise Linux support. One user notes an isolated workaround of launching from the console because Steam launch fails. That single Linux-specific launch quirk does not outweigh the broader evidence that the game works well on Linux.
- Steam Deck: score 40; verdict: Playable with manual launch workaround; summary: The reviewed feedback is largely positive for Linux compatibility: users report the game runs without issues, including on integrated Intel graphics, and one Early Access player reports no bugs. The main Steam Deck-relevant technical barrier is a report that the game refuses to launch from Steam and must be started from the console, which implies a manual workaround. The provided evidence does not include complaints about external launchers, small text, battery drain, anti-cheat errors, or frequent crashes.

- Hardware Profile: No data
Feature extractions:
- Community Price:
  - Community fair range: $8.00 - $14.00
  - Reasoning: The strongest positive price signal is at an $8 sale price, while multiple reviewers explicitly reject $15 or EUR 15.99 as not worth it and another calls a $20 price a ripoff. Some dedicated fans say full price is justified, but the overall pattern is sale-oriented value. This supports a fair base-game range of roughly $8 to $14, with $15 serving only as an upper boundary for genre fans.
- Playtime Metrics:
  - Game completion: 60.0h
  - Story completion: 30.0h
  - Session length: 2.0h
  - Endgame: 70.0h
  - Reasoning: The 50-70 hour statement and the note that all achievements can add more support a full game completion estimate of about 60 hours within that range. The French review gives an explicit campaign length of around 30 hours, while another says 30 hours only reaches halfway when playing slowly, so story completion is set near the lower explicit campaign estimate. The 'hours have passed' comment and warnings about sessions lasting well beyond an hour support multi-hour sessions; I use a conservative 2-hour session length. Post-campaign achievements and the 'probably even more if you want all achievements' line support an endgame estimate near 70 hours.
- Time-to-fun:
  - Summary: For many players, Hearthlands has a steep early learning curve and becomes enjoyable after they push through the first matches and grow a hamlet; some enjoy the tutorial immediately, while others find the loop repetitive.
  - Stance: Clicks after
  - Anchor: Persevering through the first matches
  - Time to anchor: N/A
  - Friction: High learning curve and early failed kingdoms or restarts; Tutorial is narrow and leaves players unprepared for hostile neighbors, trade, and military; Clunky UI makes trade and inventory management tedious; Early trading can feel nearly impossible; Tutorial and early campaign missions feel repetitive with little depth; Waiting on supply chains and speeding up production can trigger issues
  - Unlock drivers: Persevering through the first matches; Tutorial teaching basics and campaign slowly introducing advanced mechanics; Progressing from a small hamlet to a bustling empire; Reading building descriptions and understanding production chains; Finding balanced warehouse positions for materials
  - Conditions: Prior experience with classic city builders such as Pharaoh, Caesar, or Zeus; Patience for a learning curve and failed kingdoms; Willingness to read tutorials and building descriptions; Tolerance for logistics, supply chains, and waiting; Choosing campaign mode for guided progression; Adjusting difficulty settings; Preference for self-directed sandbox goals over structured narrative; Desire for multiplayer or feature completeness can block enjoyment
- Player Archetypes:
  - Nostalgic Impressions City-Builder Veteran (buy)
    - Motivation: Recreate the old-school Impressions/Sierra city-building experience with familiar mechanics and challenge.
    - Playstyle: Build and manage classic-style cities, use diplomacy and trade, and optionally engage in warfare.
    - Experience: veteran
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: Pharaoh; Zeus; Emperor: Rise of the Middle Kingdom; Caesar; Anno
  - Economic Systems Optimizer (buy)
    - Motivation: Optimize production, trade, and supply lines to solve economic puzzles efficiently.
    - Playstyle: Min-max production chains, balance surplus and shortages through trade, and tune city layouts.
    - Experience: veteran
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Relaxed Sandbox Builder (buy)
    - Motivation: Unwind with low-pressure town building and adjustable challenge.
    - Playstyle: Play sandbox-style at their own pace, often disabling combat or lowering difficulty.
    - Experience: mixed
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: casual player
    - Reference games: SimCity
  - Classic RTS Warfare Hybrid Player (buy)
    - Motivation: Combine city building with optional tactical warfare and army growth.
    - Playstyle: Construct forts, train infantry, and balance a battle-ready economy with territorial aggression.
    - Experience: familiar
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: Settlers; Majesty; Anno


Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category.
Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews.
What players like:
- Fun city building game (weight 0.38): Reviews consistently describe the game as an enjoyable city builder, often compared to classic Impressions-style titles. The core building mechanics are highlighted as fun and engaging.
- Overall positive gameplay experience (weight 0.3): Many reviewers find the gameplay fun, enjoyable, and challenging. The game provides a great pastime and is considered playable and amazing by several users.
- Pleasant graphics and art style (weight 0.22): Graphics are described as decent, cute, and nicely made with bright colors and clear textures. The art style is charming and unique, contributing to a pleasant visual experience.
- Good value for money (weight 0.15): The game is worth the price, offering a great deal and good value. Many reviewers feel it is worth full price and a worthwhile purchase.
- Appeals to classic city builder fans (weight 0.14): Fans of Caesar, Zeus, Pharaoh, and Emperor series will enjoy this game. It plays very much like those classics and is a worthy successor.
- Helpful tutorial (weight 0.13): The tutorial is well-made and teaches the basics effectively. Reviewers find it really helpful and solid, aiding new players in learning the game.
- Adds complexity to genre (weight 0.12): The game introduces additional mechanics such as diplomacy, trade, and military, adding depth not found in other modern city builders. This complexity enhances the gameplay experience.
- Complete and polished game (weight 0.09): The game is considered complete, polished, and containing all it should have. It feels like a finished product without missing features.
- Customizable difficulty (weight 0.09): Difficulty can be adjusted to suit both hardcore and casual players. This flexibility allows players to tailor the challenge to their liking.
- Overall okay game (weight 0.08): Some reviewers find the game just okay, not particularly bad but not outstanding. It is seen as a decent but unremarkable experience.
- Sandbox mode available (weight 0.07): A sandbox mode is included and works well, providing a fun and open-ended experience. Players enjoy the freedom it offers.
- Great premise and potential (weight 0.07): The game has a strong foundation and great premise, with potential for future development. Reviewers see it as a solid base for a great game.
- Well-executed city management (weight 0.07): The combination of city building and management is excellently executed, providing everything expected in a city management game. It is a well-crafted take on the genre.

Common complaints:
- Audio quality is poor (weight 0.21): Music, sound effects, and voice acting are frequently criticized as terrible, horrid, annoying, or bland. Ambient sounds like goats and chickens are also found irritating.
- Combat feels clunky and monotonous (weight 0.13): Multiple players describe combat as lackluster, clunky, and monotonous, with poor balance. The combat system is considered a weak point of the game.
- Gameplay becomes boring quickly (weight 0.12): Players find the overall experience boring with little challenge, and the gameplay loop becomes repetitive over time.
- Diplomacy is shallow (weight 0.09): The diplomacy system is shallow and lacks actions such as forming alliances or non-aggression pacts, making it feel barebones.
- Steep learning curve (weight 0.08): New players find the game unforgiving and difficult to learn, with a steep learning curve.
- Unfavorable comparison to Anno (weight 0.07): Players feel the game is not as good as Anno, with worse visuals and fewer animations.
- Frequent crashes and no autosave (weight 0.06): The game crashes often, forcing frequent manual saves, and the lack of frequent autosave leads to lost progress.
- UI is clunky (weight 0.06): Players describe the UI as clunky, though some say it is functional.
- Military upkeep too high (weight 0.06): Military units cost a lot, and upkeep sometimes seems ten times what it should be, making missions with multiple units economically unviable.
- Combat is auto-battle only (weight 0.05): Combat is almost entirely automatic with no tactics, retreat options, or direct control once engaged, which players find frustrating.
- Hard to gauge demand (weight 0.05): Players struggle to figure out demand volume for houses and how much furniture to supply, as the game does not clearly communicate what is in demand.
- Resource balancing needs improvement (weight 0.05): Resources are not well balanced, requiring better balancing to improve gameplay.
- Lacks modding support (weight 0.05): The game has no modding or Steam Workshop support, limiting community content creation.
- Maps too small and blank (weight 0.05): Maps are not big enough and appear pretty blank, reducing exploration and building space.
- Missing Chinese language support (weight 0.05): Chinese players lack language support, which is a significant omission for that audience.
- Lacks features (weight 0.05): The game is considered to lack features, feeling barebones in several aspects.

Gameplay feedback:
- Classic city builder style (weight 0.41): It follows the old-school formula of Impressions Games titles like Caesar, Pharaoh, and Emperor, featuring isometric 2D graphics and similar mechanics.
- City building core gameplay (weight 0.37): The game is fundamentally a city builder where players construct and manage settlements with various building types and logistics.
- Simplified accessible mechanics (weight 0.2): Compared to classic titles, the game offers streamlined mechanics and accessible complexity, making it easier for newcomers.
- Campaign with missions (weight 0.17): A structured campaign mode offers a series of missions with specific objectives, often around 12 missions, providing guided progression.
- Medieval fantasy setting (weight 0.16): The city management takes place in a medieval fantasy universe, with themes and elements inspired by the genre.
- Research and magic system (weight 0.12): A research tree and magic system allow players to unlock spells and technologies, adding strategic layers.
- Custom games and difficulty (weight 0.12): Players can start custom games with adjustable difficulty settings, catering to both casual and hardcore playstyles.
- Production chains complexity (weight 0.11): The game features multi-step production chains where raw goods are processed into finished products, adding economic depth.
- Trade with other cities (weight 0.1): Trade routes and exchanges with other cities are a key feature, allowing import and export of goods.
- Trade and diplomacy systems (weight 0.09): Players can engage in trade with neighboring kingdoms and conduct diplomacy, including gifts, requests, and warfare.
- Strategic city management (weight 0.08): Beyond building, players must manage economy, resources, and administration to grow their city.
- Military and combat features (weight 0.07): The game includes army building and combat with various troop types such as archers, berserkers, spearmen, and axemen.
- Procedurally generated maps (weight 0.07): Maps are randomly generated, offering replayability with different layouts each game.
- Housing and population growth (weight 0.07): A core loop involves building and upgrading houses by providing goods to increase population and improve residents' lives.
- Tutorial for new players (weight 0.07): A tutorial mode teaches the basics of gameplay, helping players get started.
- Game speed controls (weight 0.07): The game offers speed settings to adjust the pace of gameplay, from slow to fast.
- Village simulation with evolution (weight 0.07): Players manage a village where villagers evolve based on the food and items provided, and a diplomacy system is present.

Performance notes:
- Runs smooth and stable (weight 0.11): Multiple users report the game runs smooth, stable, and without crashes or bugs. It even runs on a potato PC.
- Performance drops at high population (weight 0.1): Freezing, frame drops, and severe lag occur when the city reaches around 6k population or in massive late-game cities. Accelerated speed becomes as slow as base speed due to performance issues.
- Frequent crashes on Mac (weight 0.08): Multiple reports of frequent crashes on MacBook Pro, with one user noting that a stability update did not resolve the issue. Restarting the Mac may reduce crash frequency.
- Mac launch requires Java (weight 0.06): The game fails to launch on Mac because it requires the legacy Java SE 6 runtime. This affects users on modern macOS versions.
- Frame drops in combat simulations (weight 0.05): Frequent frame drops, especially in combat simulations with 3-4 fighting squads or many watchtowers. Certain actions require significant calculation time.
- Frequent crashes every few hours (weight 0.05): Users report crashes every few hours, though occasional crashes are mitigated by plenty of autosaves.
- Immediate close after opening (weight 0.03): The game immediately closes after opening, preventing any gameplay.
- Mac M1 minimized window bug (weight 0.03): On macOS 12 (M1), the game launches but is unplayable because the window is minimized and the mouse position is unknown.
- Game fails to launch (weight 0.03): Game fails to launch, with no further details provided.
- Incorrect 32-bit requirement (weight 0.03): The game is reported as 32-bit and incompatible with macOS versions later than 10, despite system requirements claiming 64-bit and macOS 10.9+ support.
- Lag with many people (weight 0.03): The game lags when there are many people despite generally good optimization.
- Nvidia GPU launch trouble (weight 0.03): Nvidia GPU users may have trouble opening the game and should install Nvidia driver 378.57.
- Crashes with many sheep (weight 0.03): The game crashes when a very large number of sheep is spawned.
- Linux launch only from console (weight 0.03): On Linux the game only launches from the console and refuses to launch from Steam.
- Long loading times (weight 0.03): Long loading times for a game of this scale.
- Anti-virus alert triggered (weight 0.03): Anti-virus alert triggered by the game.
- Crash under heavy load (weight 0.03): Game crashed once while the machine was heavily taxed.
- Runs stable on Linux Intel (weight 0.03): Ran on Linux with integrated Intel video without any issue.
- Black screen first run (weight 0.03): Black screen on first run, fixed by auto updates.

Recommendations:
- Classic city builder fans (weight 0.32): Many reviewers recommend the game to fans of classic city builders such as Pharaoh, Caesar, Zeus, and Emperor. The game appeals to those with nostalgia for old Impressions Games titles.
- General city building recommendation (weight 0.23): The game is widely recommended as a solid city builder for fans of the genre, including newcomers and veterans alike. It serves as a good introduction to city-building games.
- Positive overall recommendation (weight 0.22): Many reviewers give strong positive recommendations without specific caveats, indicating general satisfaction with the game.
- Price concerns (weight 0.14): Some reviewers feel the game is not worth its asking price, suggesting waiting for a sale or a price drop.
- Sierra and SimCity fans (weight 0.09): Reviewers recommend the game to fans of old Sierra city builders and SimCity, suggesting it fills a similar niche.
- Support the developers (weight 0.07): A few reviewers encourage buying the game to support the developers, implying they appreciate the game and want to see more from the studio.
- Tutorial and new player guidance (weight 0.05): Reviewers recommend playing the tutorial as it helps new players avoid getting lost, and suggest that a tutorial would be beneficial for newcomers.

Other player notes:
- Compared to Caesar and Pharaoh (weight 0.63): The game is frequently compared to classic Impression Games city builders like Caesar, Pharaoh, Zeus, and Emperor. Players note strong similarities in mechanics and style, often citing nostalgia.
- Settlers and Anno comparisons (weight 0.38): Reviewers often compare the game to The Settlers and Anno series, noting it captures the old-school feeling of those games. Some find it reminiscent of Settlers II or Anno 1604.
- Early access status noted (weight 0.35): Many reviews mention the game is in early access, with some noting it is already playable and others acknowledging missing features. The early access phase is seen as ongoing but promising.
- Frequent developer updates praised (weight 0.2): Reviewers appreciate that the game is regularly updated with new content and that developers listen to community feedback. This ongoing support keeps the game fresh and shows active development.
- Similar to Zeus and Majesty (weight 0.15): Several reviews specifically compare the game to Zeus: Master of Olympus and Majesty, describing it as a mix of both. Some even call it a copy of Zeus.
- Full release after early access (weight 0.09): Some reviews clarify that the game has left early access and is now fully released. This indicates the game is no longer in development limbo and is considered complete.
- Large amount of content available (weight 0.09): Players feel the game offers plenty of content to keep them engaged through multiple playthroughs. The campaign mode and achievements add to the replayability.
- Similar to Lethis: Path of Progress (weight 0.08): The game is compared to Lethis: Path of Progress, with some noting it has similar but better-balanced mechanics. This suggests it appeals to fans of that style.
- Solo developer behind game (weight 0.07): The game was created primarily by one person, which is noted as impressive given its scope. This fact is mentioned in several reviews as a point of admiration.
- Favorable to Sierra city builders (weight 0.05): The game is often compared to old Sierra city builders like Caesar, Pharaoh, and Zeus, with some finding it less entertaining. However, most comparisons are positive.
- Factorio similarities noted (weight 0.04): Some reviewers compare the game to Factorio, finding it more intuitive, while others compare it unfavorably. This indicates mixed feelings about the comparison.
- Spanish localization issues (weight 0.04): There are complaints about partial Spanish localization, with key instructions left untranslated or no Spanish localization at all. This is a notable issue for Spanish-speaking players.
- Review scores around 7/10 (weight 0.04): A couple of reviews give the game a score of 7/10 or 7.5/10, indicating generally positive but not outstanding reception. This reflects a solid but not exceptional rating.
- Linux compatible (weight 0.04): The game is confirmed to run on Linux, which is appreciated by users of that platform. This adds to its accessibility.
- Received via charity bundle (weight 0.04): A few reviewers obtained the game through a charity bundle, which may have influenced their initial exposure. This is a minor point but noted in a couple of reviews.

Emotions:
- Frustration (weight 0.18): Players face persistent frustration due to inefficient AI, opaque production chains, and frequent balance bottlenecks that stall progress. Bugs, crashes, and poor combat controls compound the difficulty, making missions feel unfair and requiring tedious trial-and-error.
- Disappointment (weight 0.11): Disappointment stems from shallow gameplay, repetitive loops, and a lack of polish compared to classic city builders. Combat is simplistic, graphics and story are weak, and trade caps limit economic growth, leaving players feeling the game doesn't live up to its potential or price.
- Enjoyment (weight 0.1): Players find enjoyment in the core city-building mechanics, resource management, and the mix of old-school charm with modern quality-of-life features. The engaging gameplay, challenging missions, and satisfying progression keep them coming back despite some flaws.
- Satisfaction (weight 0.07): Satisfaction comes from solving logistics puzzles, watching systems run smoothly, and seeing the city flourish. The game offers deep mechanics, a rewarding campaign, and complete features that respect the player's time, making it a worthy successor to classic city builders.
- Annoyance (weight 0.05): Annoyance is caused by repetitive and irritating music, loud animal sounds, and a clunky interface that requires excessive micromanagement. Frequent freezing, poor autosave settings, and constant negative events add to the irritation.
- Boredom (weight 0.03): Boredom arises from repetitive gameplay, idle grinding at high speed, and a lack of challenge or meaningful events. The campaign often feels like setting up grid cities with little depth, making players feel like they are just optimizing a spreadsheet.
- Enthusiasm (weight 0.03): Enthusiasm is driven by the game's appeal to fans of classic city builders, its complex and challenging mechanics, and the variety offered by four distinct cultures. The deep management systems and polished strategy gameplay generate excitement for what the game builds on the genre.
- Appreciation (weight 0.03): Players appreciate the game's well-coded engine, impressive work by a small team, and the developer's responsiveness to the community. The fantasy setting, smart walkers, and RTS elements, along with Linux support, are praised as notable achievements.
- Nostalgia (weight 0.03): Nostalgia is evoked by the game's resemblance to classic city builders like Caesar, Pharaoh, Zeus, and Settlers, reminding players of earlier gaming days and recapturing the feelings of those beloved titles.
- Surprise (weight 0.02): Surprise comes from the game being unexpectedly polished and fun despite its simple appearance or solo development. Players are also surprised by its difficulty, the depth of combat, and how it flew under the radar for so long.
- Hope (weight 0.02): Hope is fueled by the game's potential and the desire for future updates, additional content, and features like multiplayer. Players look forward to improvements and hope the game continues to develop in a positive direction.
- Excitement (weight 0.02): Excitement stems from the prospect of investing many hours into a complex, challenging city builder with high replayability and deep mechanics. The anticipation of future content and the game's current promise generate eager anticipation.
- Fun (weight 0.02): Fun is found in the core city-building gameplay, supply chain planning, and the cozy settlement-building experience. Players enjoy optimizing building placement and learning through failed kingdoms and restarts.
- Admiration (weight 0.02): Admiration is expressed for the game's unique design, brilliant combination of genres, and the dedication of its developers. The game is seen as an underrated gem with depth and charm, especially considering it was mostly programmed by one person.
- Amusement (weight 0.02): Amusement arises from humorous elements like funny animations, quirky citizen demands, and the absurdity of townspeople prioritizing alcohol. The game's lighthearted tone and comical situations provide entertainment.
- Anticipation (weight 0.02): Anticipation is high for unlocking more buildings and magic, future updates, and the full release of planned features. Players look forward to learning mechanics and seeing the finished product.
- Confusion (weight 0.01): Confusion is caused by complex resource requirements, unclear production chains, and a lack of clear statistics or goals. The trade system and building similarities add to the bewilderment, especially as the city grows.
- Addiction (weight 0.01): Addiction is driven by the heavy focus on logistics and resource management, which players find highly engaging and hard to put down. The constant stream of issues to manage keeps them hooked.
- Love (weight 0.01): Love for the game is expressed by players who are deeply fond of its design, progression, and how it builds on classic city-building recipes. It is seen as a hidden gem that they can't stop playing.
- Pleasure (weight 0.01): Pleasure comes from the rich, well-balanced mechanics of production, trade, development, military, and diplomacy. Managing and watching the city grow in the style of classic city builders is a delightful experience.}