
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
Review evidence
Addictive and engaging gameplay: The gameplay is described as addictive, engaging, and suitable for various players, including those with ADHD. It offers diverse loops and active elements that keep players hooked.
Overall great game design: The game is praised for its fascinating design, depth, and overall enjoyment. Players find it highly engaging and well-crafted.
Great for idle game lovers: The game is highly recommended for fans of idle games. It offers enjoyable incremental mechanics and is fun for those who like watching numbers go up and clicking buttons.
Offline progress and automation: The game supports offline progress and has an automation system that allows for background play and overnight running.
Unique and complex mechanics: The game offers unique and fun mechanics that go beyond simple idle gameplay. It brings a clever twist to the genre.
Game is slow: The game has been reported to be very slow at certain points, particularly in the beginning and after the minerals update. Players find the progression to be slow and tedious.
Game is grindy: Players find the game to be very grindy, with excessive grinding required at certain points. This can make the game feel tedious and time-consuming.
Macro system issues: The macro system in the game has been criticized for not making sense, feeling redundant, and being undercooked. Players find it annoying and not useful.
Game is buggy: Players have reported that the game is not working properly, with bugs causing progress loss and other issues. The game has been described as irritating and very buggy.
Health warnings needed: The game has been reported to be dangerous for players with photo sensitivity or epilepsy due to flickering and flashing. This can make the game unsuitable for some players.
Automation features needed: Players frequently mention the need for better automation features, including macros and logic rules to enhance gameplay efficiency.
Complex progression systems: Players highlight the complexity and depth of the progression systems, including multiple currencies, prestige layers, and nested prestige systems.
Idle and incremental gameplay: The game is often described as an idle/incremental game, with players appreciating the progression systems and mechanics typical of this genre.
Infinity and prestige systems: Players mention the infinity system and multi-layered prestige systems as key features that add long-term goals and replayability.
Unique systems like tarot and zodiac: The game includes unique systems such as tarot cards, astrology, and zodiac mechanics, which add variety and interest to the gameplay.
Optimization and performance: The game runs well on low-end systems but requires optimization for better performance, especially with dark mode lowering FPS.
Connection and loading issues: Players have reported various problems related to connection issues and the game not loading properly.
Text display problems: There are issues with text jittering and center-aligned text boxes updating at 60 fps, affecting readability.
Memory leaks and resource usage: The game has memory leaks and high system resource usage, which can affect overall performance.
Visual issues: There are reports of flashing lights and rapid changes in digits, which can be visually disturbing.
Recommended despite flaws: Reviewers recommend the game even though it has some flaws, such as flickering, suggesting the overall experience is still positive.
Highly recommended for genre fans: The game is frequently recommended for fans of the incremental or idle game genre, indicating it meets the expectations of enthusiasts.
Recommended for Antimatter Dimensions fans: This game is highly recommended for players who enjoy Antimatter Dimensions, suggesting it offers a similar or enhanced experience.
Highly recommended for content and updates: The game is praised for its substantial content and frequent updates, making it a highly recommended choice for players.
Recommended over paid idle games: Reviewers suggest donating to this game instead of buying paid idle games, indicating it offers great value and a worthwhile experience.
Community fair range: $0.00 - $5.00.
Game completion: 1352.6h.
Endgame: 1000.0h.
The game starts with significant friction due to tedious steps and repetitive tasks but becomes more enjoyable after unlocking automation features and perks, which partially automate processes and make progression faster.
Reported time to anchor: 24h.
Friction: tedious steps; repetitive tasks; complex menus.
Unlock drivers: automation features; perks.
Integrity-Seeking Strategist: Strategic and patient, focusing on long-term goals and meaningful achievements. Motivation: Meaningful progression and well-balanced game design. Stance: buy.
Grind-Embracing Achiever: Persistent and patient, focusing on gradual improvement and enduring repetitive tasks. Motivation: Incremental progress and long-term achievement. Stance: sale.
Casual Progress Enjoyer: Casual and relaxed, focusing on easy-to-understand mechanics and quick sessions. Motivation: Relaxation and simple, satisfying progress. Stance: buy.
The game performs well across all hardware cohorts, with players reporting positive experiences and good frame rates.
Windows <8GB VRAM: positive. Players report a great FPS and an enjoyable experience.
Windows 8-11GB VRAM: positive. Players find the game great once they get the hang of it.
Windows 16GB+ VRAM: positive. The game runs at a steady 60 FPS on high-end hardware.
Steam Deck: The game has several significant issues that impact user experience, including memory leaks, invasive anti-cheat measures, and performance bugs. However, features like cloud saves are well-received. The memory leaks and anti-cheat measures are particularly severe problems that need addressing.
Linux and Proton: The game experiences significant memory leak issues on both Windows and Linux platforms, which severely impacts the user experience.
Monetization: The game has a mixed reception regarding its monetization practices. While some players appreciate the optional nature of microtransactions and the extensive content, others are critical of the pay-to-win elements, aggressive monetization strategies, and developer actions that nerf paid mechanics. These issues can significantly impact the player experience and perception of the game.
External guides: The game heavily relies on external wikis for progression and understanding, leading to a high dependency on external data sources. Users frequently mention the need to consult wikis to grasp game mechanics and advance, indicating significant instructional data dependency. Additionally, the gameplay becomes repetitive, involving following wiki templates, which can result in a monotonous experience. The game also suffers from insufficient in-game guidance, making it challenging to understand without external resources.
Warning about photo sensitivity: The game includes warnings about potential risks for players with photo sensitivity and epileptic seizures.