Info about Minecraft Dungeons II:

Official game description:
Deluxe Edition
==============
Get the Deluxe Edition for even more battles ahead! Includes 4 hero skins, the Soul cape, the Blub pet, and DLC 1 & 2.\*
\* Available as released. 
About the Game
==============
Minecraft Dungeons II is here with more action, more loot, and more adventure. Step through the rift and fight where no hero has been before: the Sift, an uncharted dimension teeming with threats, mysteries, and breathtaking beauty. Gear up and customize your playstyle to face your toughest enemies yet in explosive battles. Brave the unknown as a lone hero, team up with friends in couch, online and mixed co-op, or find allies through matchmaking. The illagers’ plot is already underway, and their cruelty is only matched by their power. Stop them – or lose the Overworld to their corruption.
Fight against a new, challenging threat that puts your combat skills to the test like never before 
Explore the Sift, a new dimension in the Minecraft universe, for the first time
Experience an all-new chapter in the Minecraft Dungeons saga that takes you across the Overworld... and beyond 
Craft the perfect hero with legendary gear, including a wide range of weapons, armour, and artifacts 
Team up with new and old friends in a party of up to four players and smash your foes with the power of teamwork

Release date: Sep 29, 2026

Categories: Action RPG, Dungeon Crawler, Cooperative Multiplayer, Open-World Exploration, Loot-driven Gameplay, Character Progression, Crafting

Feature scans:
- MTX: score 20; verdict: Fair / Paid Base Game + Traditional DLC (No Predatory MTX); summary: The reviewed title (a Minecraft Dungeons sequel) monetizes through a paid base game plus separate paid DLC mission packs and cosmetic DLC, with users frequently describing this as a 'cash grab' and criticizing the $50 base price, deluxe edition, and preorder value. There is no evidence of an in-game cash shop, real-money gacha, loot boxes, currency obfuscation, boosters, or pay-to-win mechanics; one review even notes the battle pass was removed. The complaints center on DLC-gated content and upfront pricing, both of which the scoring rules cap at the fair/low band.
- Proton/Linux: score 85; verdict: Barely Playable - Heavy Custom-Proton Workarounds Required; summary: Linux/SteamOS feedback is dominated by launch failure caused by the game's dependency on Microsoft Xbox/Gaming Services, which standard Proton Experimental and GE-Proton cannot satisfy (the needed API is unimplemented). Users consistently report that getting in requires a custom GDK Proton build, manual DLL/file patching, and certificate modifications, and even then account linking often fails with errors and crashes persist. Several reviewers emphasize this is a regression from Minecraft Dungeons 1, which ran on Linux and Steam Deck. At the same time, multiple users confirm that community fixes let them reach gameplay, so Linux support is rough and workaround-heavy rather than completely non-functional.
- Steam Deck: score 90; verdict: Broken on Steam Deck - Requires Custom Proton to Launch; summary: Steam Deck and Linux feedback is overwhelmingly dominated by a launch-level failure: Minecraft Dungeons II hard-requires Microsoft Xbox Gaming Services, which is not implemented in Proton, so the game simply will not start for Deck users. The only known path is community workarounds involving a custom GDK-Proton build, DLL replacement (XCurl.dll), file patching and certificate injection, and even then account linking fails and save data is at risk. Beyond the Linux blocker, users report frequent crashes (including during cutscenes and dungeons), inability to launch in Steam Offline Mode (Error 0020), missing WASD support with uncomfortable keyboard mapping, and blurry upscaling with 24fps-locked cutscenes. Users who do get in describe fun, smooth gameplay, confirming the friction is platform-driven rather than design-driven. Per the scoring rubric, the dominant symptom is 'the game simply won't launch' combined with frequent crashes, placing this deep in the Broken band.

- Hardware Profile:
  - Summary: Across the selected Windows hardware cohorts, performance is inconsistent: lower-VRAM and 8-11 GB VRAM groups show frequent crashes, stuttering, and low cutscene frame rates, while some 12-15 GB and 16 GB+ VRAM systems report smooth high-FPS play alongside stability and Linux/Proton issues. The strongest recurring complaints are crashes, freezes, 24-30 FPS cutscenes, and poor optimization on lower-end hardware.
  - Sample size: 726 (29% coverage)
  - Audience skew: Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
  - Windows <8GB VRAM / <16GB RAM (mixed, 130 reports): Reports are split: some players get smooth 120-144 FPS at medium/high settings, while others report crashes, freezes, sub-30 FPS, and UE5 instability.
  - Windows 12-15GB VRAM / 16-31GB RAM (mixed, 126 reports): Several users report high FPS and smooth performance on max/Ultra settings, but others cite UE5 crashes, stuttering, poor 4K image quality, and 24 FPS cutscenes.
  - Windows 8-11GB VRAM (negative, 122 reports): Performance problems dominate, with frequent crashes, stuttering, login failures, blurry/low-resolution rendering, and cutscenes stuck around 15-24 FPS despite some smooth 120 FPS reports.
  - Windows <8GB VRAM / 16-31GB RAM (negative, 121 reports): Crashes, black-screen freezes, severe lag, and frequent instability are the main reports, though some 8 GB systems run at max settings with stable FPS.
  - Windows 16GB+ VRAM (mixed, 44 reports): High-end Windows systems often achieve excellent 160+ FPS at 4K max settings, but the cohort also reports crashes, disconnects, low-FPS cutscenes, and no Linux/Steam Deck support.
  - Windows 12-15GB VRAM / 32GB+ RAM (negative, 43 reports): Most reports describe crashes, freezes, heavy blurring, and low boss-fight FPS, with only isolated positive performance notes.
  - Caveats: 726 of 2541 reviews expose hardware metadata.; Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
Feature extractions:
- Community Price:
  - Community fair range: $20.00 - $30.00
  - Reasoning: The explicit price comments show resistance to the $40-$50 range, with several users saying the game is not worth full price and should be bought on sale or at a half discount. At the same time, positive comments treat $30 as a fair and worthwhile price. Taken together, the community's fair base-game range sits below the criticized $40-$50 tier but around the accepted $30 level, with sale-oriented feedback pointing to the low end near $20.
- Playtime Metrics:
  - Game completion: 22.5h
  - Story completion: 10.0h
  - Session length: 1.5h
  - Endgame: N/A
  - Reasoning: The first quote gives a first-playthrough completion range of 20-25 hours for main quest, side quests, and dungeons, so gameCompletion is set to the midpoint 22.5 hours. The second quote directly states the story takes 10 hours to complete, supporting storyCompletion = 10, and also states there is no endgame, supporting endgame = 0. The third quote reports a 1h30 play session, supporting sessionLength = 1.5 hours.
- Time-to-fun:
  - Summary: Early fetch quests and technical/multiplayer friction can delay enjoyment, but the game reportedly picks up once players reach Howling Woods. Some players find combat and co-op fun immediately, while others report a late-game drop after the initial playthrough.
  - Stance: Clicks after
  - Anchor: Reaching howling woods
  - Time to anchor: N/A
  - Friction: First hour is almost all fetch quests and fails to captivate; Early game gear system does not feel good; Login, account linking, and joining games fail or queue; Separate online and offline characters create a forced choice; Multiplayer lag, rubber banding, input delay, and disconnects; Control scheme lacks WASD/accessibility and tutorial explanations
  - Unlock drivers: Reaching Howling Woods; Playing solo instead of online multiplayer
  - Conditions: Playing with friends or family; Playing solo or with randoms; Choosing online versus offline character; Platform, especially Linux/Steam Deck compatibility; Tolerance for bugs, queues, and current state; Using controller versus keyboard; Reaching Howling Woods; Fixing major multiplayer issues
- Player Archetypes:
  - Co-op-First Dungeon Crawler (sale)
    - Motivation: Playing dungeon runs with friends or family in shared local or online sessions.
    - Playstyle: Team-focused hack-and-slash runs, local co-op, online co-op, and occasional solo play between group sessions.
    - Experience: familiar
    - Purchase stance: sale
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Loot-Grinding ARPG Veteran (deep sale)
    - Motivation: Chasing loot upgrades, optimizing builds, and testing endgame item-power progression.
    - Playstyle: Efficient grinding, build experimentation, stat comparison, and deep mechanical analysis of combat and loot systems.
    - Experience: veteran
    - Purchase stance: deep sale
    - Labels: experienced player
    - Reference games: Minecraft Dungeons 1; Path of Exile
  - PC Controls and Platform Purist (no buy)
    - Motivation: Playing with standard PC controls and on supported operating systems without workarounds.
    - Playstyle: Keyboard-and-mouse or Steam Deck play, with strong expectations for native WASD support and Linux compatibility.
    - Experience: mixed
    - Purchase stance: no buy
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: Path of Exile 2
  - Minecraft Franchise Loyalist (buy)
    - Motivation: Supporting and experiencing the Minecraft franchise, including cosmetic rewards and collection goals.
    - Playstyle: Casual exploration, story and ambience appreciation, cape collection, and forgiving play despite technical issues.
    - Experience: mixed
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: Minecraft fan; hardcore fan; big fan of the franchise
    - Reference games: Minecraft


Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category.
Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews.
What players like:
- Highly Positive Player Reception (weight 0.27): A large number of reviews expressed strong enthusiasm and satisfaction with the game. Many described it as fun, well-made, and a masterpiece.
- Improvement Over First Game (weight 0.26): Many reviewers noted that this game is better than its predecessor in almost every way. Improvements include movement, combat, soundtrack, upgrading, and overall mechanics.
- Fun Gameplay Experience (weight 0.13): Reviewers frequently described the gameplay as engaging and entertaining. It appeals to both solo and multiplayer experiences.
- Beloved Open World (weight 0.12): The open world design received widespread praise for being refreshing, fun, and providing freedom. It is seen as a major step up from the previous level-based system.
- Impressive Graphics (weight 0.09): The visual quality was highlighted as beautiful and excellent. Graphics are bright, pleasant, and contribute to the game's appeal.
- Polished and Stable (weight 0.09): No significant bugs or performance issues were reported. The game runs smoothly even on max settings.
- Open World Preferred Over Levels (weight 0.07): The open world approach is seen as superior to a level selector. It encourages exploration and works better for this type of game.
- Outshines Minecraft Dungeons (weight 0.06): Many compared it favorably to Minecraft Dungeons, calling it a masterpiece and a direct sequel that improves upon the original.
- Enhanced Multiplayer Experience (weight 0.06): Playing with friends makes the game even better, and multiplayer functionality is easy to use and enjoyable.
- New Dimension Reception (weight 0.06): The new shift dimension is considered perfect and cool by some, while others find it strange but well done.
- Favorable Early Impressions (weight 0.05): Players who have just started are enjoying the game and like the direction it is heading. First impressions are positive.
- Improved Combat System (weight 0.04): Combat feels much better than the original, with a more engaging system. The new combat mechanics are a nice improvement.
- Strong Sequel (weight 0.04): Reviewers consider it a solid and great sequel. It successfully follows up on a good first part.
- Jump Mechanic Praised (weight 0.04): The addition of jumping is well-received. Jump attacks are seen as a positive addition to gameplay.
- Overall Fun Factor (weight 0.03): Many simply describe the game as really fun and enjoyable. This highlights the game's broad appeal.
- Recommendations and Affection (weight 0.03): Reviewers express love for the game and recommend it to others. This indicates high satisfaction and word-of-mouth potential.
- Stunning Environments (weight 0.03): The game's environments are described as beautiful and stunning. This adds to the overall immersive experience.
- Enjoyable New Mechanics (weight 0.03): New mechanics are considered interesting and positive. They add freshness to the gameplay.
- Controller Compatibility (weight 0.03): The game works well with a controller. Many find it fun and better to play with a controller.
- Liked New Art Style (weight 0.03): The change in art style is appreciated. The new graphic style is interesting and liked by players.

Common complaints:
- Linux Compatibility Problems (weight 0.29): The game fails to run on Linux, even with compatibility layers like Proton, due to dependencies on Microsoft Gaming Services. Users report crashes, launch failures, and the need for third-party fixes.
- Missing WASD Movement Support (weight 0.29): Many players report that the game lacks WASD movement controls, forcing mouse-only or controller input. This makes the game feel clunky or nearly unplayable for those without a controller.
- Microsoft Account Login Issues (weight 0.16): Users frequently encounter problems linking or logging into their Microsoft accounts, including errors, disconnections, and inability to connect. This prevents access to online features and causes frustration.
- Steam Deck Incompatibility (weight 0.11): The game does not run on Steam Deck at launch, often requiring mods or workarounds. Many users report it is unplayable on the device without significant effort.
- Worse Than Previous Games (weight 0.11): Many players feel the game is a step backward from its predecessors, lacking polish, depth, and fun. It is often described as a downgrade or less replayable.
- Hidden Equipment Stats (weight 0.08): Players cannot view weapon and armor stats such as damage, health, or attack speed. This lack of information makes gear comparison and optimization difficult.
- Emerald Cap Too Low (weight 0.08): The emerald currency is capped at 9,999, which is reached quickly and leads to wasted emeralds when salvaging. Players find this limit frustrating and poorly communicated.
- Clunky Keyboard/Mouse Controls (weight 0.06): The default keyboard and mouse controls are considered awkward, especially with jump assigned to space instead of evasion. Many find them difficult to use.
- General Bugs and Glitches (weight 0.05): Players report various bugs, though not always game-breaking, contributing to an unpolished experience. Some describe the game as a buggy mess.

Gameplay feedback:
- Open-world design praised (weight 0.19): Players highlight the shift from separate mission/level maps to a fully explorable open world. Regions can be revisited, and dungeons and side quests are scattered throughout the map.
- Multiplayer and co-op support (weight 0.17): The game offers online and local co-op with friends, including 4-player support and remote play. Matchmaking with random players is also available.
- Jumping and jump attacks (weight 0.15): A new jump mechanic has been added and is integrated into combat as jump attacks. Many reviewers mention jumping as a notable new feature.
- Separate online/offline characters (weight 0.13): Characters are locked to either online or offline mode and cannot be used across both. This forces players to create separate characters for each mode.
- Online queue system (weight 0.06): Entering online play requires going through a queue, even for single-player online sessions. This queue system is a recurring point of feedback.
- Enchantment system present (weight 0.05): The game features an enchantment system where enchants are collectible and can be applied. A rework of the enchantment system is also mentioned.
- Dungeon crawler RPG (weight 0.05): Reviewers categorize the game as a dungeon crawler RPG with open-world elements. The core gameplay involves exploring dungeons.
- Boss fights included (weight 0.05): The game includes boss fights that can sometimes block progression. Combat against these bosses is a key part of the experience.
- Multiple control schemes supported (weight 0.05): The game supports both keyboard/mouse and controller inputs. Movement can be controlled via keyboard or controller joystick.
- Auto arrow regeneration (weight 0.04): Bow ammo replenishes automatically over time, removing the need to manually collect arrows. This quality-of-life feature is noted by players.
- New mechanics vs. predecessor (weight 0.04): Many new mechanics and a new dimension have been introduced compared to the previous game. Players note significant mechanical differences.
- Side quests available (weight 0.03): Secondary quests, commonly known as side quests, are present in the game. They provide additional content alongside the main storyline.
- Sequel to previous title (weight 0.03): The game is a direct sequel to an earlier title, continuing the story or mechanics. Reviewers often reference the first game when comparing features.
- Artifacts consume souls (weight 0.03): Artifacts now cost souls to use, even if they are not soul-based items. This change affects resource management.
- Pathfinding-based navigation (weight 0.03): A pathfinding system is used for navigation, allowing characters to automatically find routes. This feature is mentioned in the context of movement.
- Built with Unreal Engine 5 (weight 0.03): The game is powered by Unreal Engine 5, which may contribute to its visual and technical performance. This is noted as a technical detail.

Performance notes:
- Frequent crashes and instability (weight 0.18): Players experience frequent crashes on launch or during gameplay, with some reporting crashes every few minutes. This makes the game unplayable for many.
- Good optimization and performance (weight 0.15): Many users report the game runs smoothly on ultra settings, even on older hardware, with high FPS and no stutters. Performance is generally praised.
- Cutscenes locked to low FPS (weight 0.11): Many players report cutscenes running at 20-30 fps regardless of hardware, with some seeing as low as 10 fps and stutters. This is a widespread issue that affects the viewing experience.
- Game fails to launch or load (weight 0.07): Some players cannot start the game or get stuck on loading screens, making it impossible to play. This issue appears across different systems.
- Lag and input delay (weight 0.06): Noticeable lag occurs throughout the game, including offline mode, and input delay is reported during online play. This impacts responsiveness and gameplay.
- Ghosting and visual artifacts (weight 0.04): Players notice ghosting issues and blurry visuals due to upscaling bugs. These graphical problems detract from the visual experience.
- Crashes during online play (weight 0.03): Some players experience crashes specifically when playing online, though less frequent than general crashes. This affects multiplayer sessions.
- Microsoft account linking crashes (weight 0.03): Linking a Microsoft account causes freezes and crashes, sometimes even crashing the PC. This is a critical issue for account integration.
- Game does not close properly (weight 0.03): Some users report the game remains in task manager after closing, consuming memory. This can affect system performance.
- Mixed optimization experiences (weight 0.02): While many praise optimization, some find it questionable or poorly optimized. Opinions vary based on individual setups.

Recommendations:
- Controller strongly recommended (weight 0.14): Multiple reviewers emphasize that a controller is necessary or vastly superior for comfortable play. Mouse and keyboard users are often advised against buying.
- Mixed current recommendation status (weight 0.13): Some reviewers cannot recommend the game in its current state, while others give a positive recommendation. This reflects a split in overall sentiment.
- Wait for bug fixes before buying (weight 0.11): Many reviewers advise against purchasing until current bugs and issues are resolved. They suggest waiting for day 0 or day 1 patches before committing.
- Fans of first game will enjoy (weight 0.08): Reviewers note that those who liked the original game will likely love this sequel even more. It appeals strongly to existing fans.
- Steam Deck and Linux issues (weight 0.07): The game does not work properly on Steam Deck or Linux, leading to refunds and negative reviews. Reviewers warn not to buy if intending to play on those platforms.
- Worth the price for many (weight 0.06): Several reviewers find the game worth its price tag and recommend purchasing it, including the Deluxe edition. They consider it a good value.
- WASD support and bug fixes needed (weight 0.05): Some reviewers are holding off until WASD controls are added and annoying bugs are fixed. They are willing to try again after these improvements.
- Wait for sale or discount (weight 0.04): Some reviewers suggest waiting for a sale before purchasing, as they would not buy at full price. Others mention waiting for the DLC to be finished and discounted.
- Refunding and not recommending (weight 0.04): A number of reviewers are refunding the game and do not recommend keeping it. They express dissatisfaction with the current state.
- Not recommended for keyboard-mouse players (weight 0.03): Reviewers explicitly advise against buying if you plan to use keyboard and mouse. The game is not suited for that control scheme.
- Avoid preordering (weight 0.02): Reviewers advise against preordering the game, likely due to the issues present at launch. They suggest waiting for reviews or fixes.

Other player notes:
- Better than first game (weight 0.36): Players compare this game favorably to its predecessor and the first Minecraft Dungeons, considering it better, harder, and a huge improvement. Many cite additions like the open world as major enhancements.
- No native Linux support (weight 0.17): The game lacks official Linux support and is not advertised to work on Linux, causing many negative reviews. It is a product-level issue that prevents Linux users from playing.
- Requires Microsoft Gaming Services (weight 0.13): Unlike the first game, this title requires Microsoft Gaming Services, the Xbox app, and a Microsoft account to run. This dependency contributes to incompatibility on Linux.
- Windows-only, not Steam Deck (weight 0.08): The game requires a Windows device and is not available on Linux or Steam Deck. It appears designed to not launch without Windows, as listed on the Steam page.
- Microsoft account linking issues (weight 0.06): Some players had trouble linking their Microsoft account to the game. The game uses a Microsoft account linking process, which has caused problems for many.
- Community-made Linux workaround available (weight 0.06): A community-made fix exists that allows the game to run on Linux, though verified status may not be confirmed. A script on GitHub serves as a workaround.
- Linux fix requires custom steps (weight 0.05): Running the game on Linux requires a custom Proton build and manually replacing XCurl.dll in the game's binaries folder. The game does not natively support Linux.
- Future DLC planned (weight 0.04): At least two more DLCs are planned, and the game will receive additional content in the future. DLCs are expected or already available.
- Paid cosmetic pack available (weight 0.03): A cosmetic pack for additional cost includes four cosmetics: two characters, one pet, and one cape. Other cosmetics such as Hero cape, Twisted Cape, chicken, two skins, and a Corrupted Creeper cape are also included.
- No WASD keyboard movement (weight 0.03): The game does not support WASD controls natively. There is no keyboard movement option available, which some players find limiting.

Emotions:
- Frustration (weight 0.31): Players are frustrated by a wide range of technical issues, including frequent crashes, poor performance, and incompatibility with Linux and Steam Deck. Many also cite unresponsive and poorly designed controls, particularly the lack of WASD movement, which makes the game difficult to play without a controller. Additionally, forced online queues, account linking problems, and numerous game-breaking bugs further exacerbate the frustration.
- Disappointment (weight 0.19): Disappointment stems from the game feeling like a downgrade from its predecessor, with missing features, a shorter story, and less engaging gameplay. Technical problems such as crashes, poor performance, and lack of Linux support prevented many from playing, while design choices like the removal of WASD controls and simplified mechanics left players underwhelmed. The overall lack of polish and missing content contributed to a sense of unmet expectations.
- Enjoyment (weight 0.08): Players enjoy the game's fun combat, engaging open world, and cooperative multiplayer. Many appreciate the improved mechanics, such as the enchanting system and varied loot, as well as the overall atmosphere and visual design. Despite technical issues, the core gameplay loop is compelling and provides hours of entertainment.
- Annoyance (weight 0.06): Annoyance is primarily caused by the forced click-to-move controls and the absence of WASD support, which makes movement feel clunky. Other irritants include long queue times, frequent minor bugs, and restrictions like the separation of online and offline characters. These issues detract from the overall experience and cause continual minor frustrations.
- Satisfaction (weight 0.06): Satisfaction comes from the game's quality-of-life improvements, such as the reworked inventory and enchanting systems, and the engaging open world. Many players find the game to be a polished and enjoyable sequel that improves upon the original, with smooth performance and satisfying combat. The overall experience meets or exceeds expectations for many.
- Anger (weight 0.05): Anger is fueled by the game's unplayability due to crashes, connectivity issues, and lack of Linux support, which some perceive as intentional. Technical problems like broken servers, account linking failures, and lost items further enrage players. Additionally, the feeling of being treated as unpaid testers for an unfinished product and greedy business decisions contribute to strong resentment.
- Excitement (weight 0.02): Excitement is driven by the game's new open-world design, improved combat, and the promise of future content. Players are eager to explore new dimensions, fight bosses, and continue playing with friends. The fresh mechanics and engaging gameplay loop generate anticipation for what's to come.
- Love (weight 0.02): Players express love for the game's open world, graphics, and overall experience, often citing it as an upgrade from the first installment. The new systems and equipment mechanics, along with the vibrant colors and charming elements like pets, contribute to a deep affection for the game.
- Hope (weight 0.01): Hope is centered on the possibility of future patches and updates that could fix bugs, add WASD support, and improve online functionality. Players believe the game has potential and are optimistic that developers will address issues and make it enjoyable in the long run.
- Relief (weight 0.01): Relief is felt when players manage to get the game working after troubleshooting, especially on Linux, or when feared issues turn out to be non-problems. Successful account linking and smooth performance after fixes also bring a sense of relief.
- Joy (weight 0.01): Joy arises from the game's polished mechanics, dynamic combat, and colorful world. Players have a blast playing, especially with the new jump attack and improved effects, and appreciate the many references to the first game that evoke happy memories.
- Confusion (weight 0.01): Confusion stems from unclear design choices, such as the inability to rebind movement controls, the separation of online and offline heroes, and unexplained technical issues like random game closures. Players also question why point-and-click controls were chosen and why visual filters make the game blurry.
- Anticipation (weight 0.01): Anticipation is fueled by excitement for future content, including potential expansions to end-game and the integration of new dimensions into main Minecraft. Players look forward to build crafting and challenging areas like the Skulk Caves.
- Boredom (weight 0.01): Boredom results from repetitive side quests, frequent ambushes, and same-structured dungeons. The first hour often fails to engage players, leading to a lack of interest and a sense of tedium.
- Happiness (weight 0.01): Happiness is derived from the early game experience, including the open world, combat, and progression, as well as finally being able to play the sequel. Beautiful visuals, smooth performance, and fun mechanics like jumping with heavy weapons contribute to a joyful experience.
- Liking (weight 0.01): Players like the game's open world, cooperative play, and graphical quality despite some flaws. The ability to jump and the overall feel of the game add to the positive impression.
- Uncertainty (weight 0.01): Uncertainty arises from not having experienced enough of the game, particularly endgame content, and concerns about Linux compatibility and whether the purchase was worthwhile. The new build and upgrade systems also leave players unsure.
- Positive (weight 0.01): Positive impressions are based on the game being fun, easy to learn, and an improvement over the first installment. The initial experience is welcoming and enjoyable.
- Optimism (weight 0.01): Optimism is rooted in the belief that the game will improve with updates and that it has the potential to surpass the first game. The nice gameplay and neat world, despite bugs, contribute to a hopeful outlook.
- Mild annoyance (weight 0): Mild annoyance is caused by minor issues like click-to-move controls, poor guidance beam pathfinding, monotonous side quests, and remote play problems. Persistent blur that requires settings adjustments also adds to the irritation.}