Blood And Zombies Review Summary

Fun zombie co-op with strong base building, but plagued by glitches, repetitive gameplay, and dated graphics.

Overall fun and enjoyable: Many players find the game overall fun and enjoyable, with adequate graphics and solid mechanics. The game is described as surprisingly good and addictive, exceeding expectations.

Best experienced with friends: Multiple reviewers highlight that the game is significantly more enjoyable when played with friends, with specific mentions of casual fun and laughing at the game's flaws. The game is seen as a great co-op experience for passing time.

Strong concept and potential: Reviewers frequently mention the game's good concept and potential, with many noting it is full of good ideas. The premise is seen as strong, though execution may vary.

Satisfying base building: Building up defenses and fortifications is satisfying, and the building mechanics are well-made and easy to use. The material/building aspect is a highlight for many players.

Fun zombie blasting: Reviewers enjoy blasting zombies, with satisfying explosions and headshots. The game offers exploits that help, and it's fun to kill as many zombies as possible.

Game is extremely glitchy: Players consistently describe the game as janky, glitchy, and full of bugs, with clunky gunplay and poor optimization. This suggests a widespread technical quality issue that undermines the overall experience.

Gameplay is bland and boring: Reviewers find the gameplay bland, monotonous, and lacking content, calling the game soulless and bare bones. The core loop feels dry and tedious, leading to boredom.

Graphics are poor and dated: Multiple clusters highlight poor graphics and animations, describing them as lacking, wooden, or reminiscent of old arcade machines. This indicates a significant visual presentation deficit.

Zombies break and glitch: Zombies frequently glitch out, running in place or standing still during walk animations due to broken pathfinding. This breaks immersion and makes combat feel unreliable.

Building mechanics are flawed: Building mechanics are poorly implemented, with flaky placement, inconsistent snapping, and fortifications that break easily. These issues frustrate players and hinder base construction.

Wave-based zombie defense shooter: The game is consistently described as a wave-based zombie shooter with tower defense and base defense elements. Players must survive increasingly difficult waves while managing defenses and shooting zombies.

FPS and tower defense hybrid: Multiple clusters highlight the hybrid nature of the game, combining first-person shooting with tower defense mechanics. This unique blend is a defining feature according to player feedback.

Character progression system: The game features character progression with experience and skill points, across four playable characters. Players can level up each character individually, adding depth.

Build fortifications and turrets: Players can build simple fortifications, place blocks, fences, and turrets to defend against zombies. This base building aspect is important for survival.

Earn money for upgrades: Players can earn money by killing zombies and spend it on weapons, upgrades, and defensive structures. This economy system is central to gameplay.

Severe frame rate drops: Performance degrades as the game progresses, with frame rate drops becoming severe after level 30. At level 38, the game becomes a slideshow with 10-15 FPS, while lag can also occur after wave 10.

Poor optimization reported: Several players report general poor optimization and a need for more optimization. These vague complaints suggest the game may have broader performance issues beyond specific levels.

Keyboard stops working: Keyboard stopped working multiple times after passing the first wave of zombies, which can make the game unplayable. This is a critical input bug.

Hit registration issues: Hit registration feels like playing on a server with high ping, indicating poor netcode or hit detection issues. This can severely impact combat gameplay.

Mouse sensitivity resets: Mouse sensitivity resets, which can be frustrating for players who need consistent aiming. This is a specific settings bug that affects gameplay control.

Not worth full price: Many reviewers emphasize that the game is not worth its full price, suggesting waiting for a significant sale or a deep discount (often 70% or more). Some recommend it only if bought at a very low price, indicating value is contingent on cost.

Strongly not recommended: A large number of reviewers strongly advise against purchasing or playing the game, describing it as a waste of money and time. Several even recommend refunding or avoiding it entirely, regardless of discounts.

Fun with friends: Positive feedback focuses on the game being fun, especially in cooperative play with friends, for casual zombie shooting, and for fans of the genre. Some recommend it for those who enjoy building bases and have patience.

Better alternatives exist: Several reviewers suggest alternative games like Killing Floor, Left 4 Dead 2, Sanctum 2, Wolfenstein, Doom, 7 Days To Die, or Yet Another Zombie Defense as better options. This indicates the game is seen as inferior to established titles in the genre.

Unfinished and buggy: Some reviewers express concerns about the game's current state, mentioning it is not trustworthy as a finished product, needs significant improvements, and buyers should be cautious. This points to unresolved bugs or development issues.

Community fair range: $5.00 - $10.00.

Game completion: 3.0h.

Session length: 2.0h.

Most reviewers find Blood And Zombies boring, repetitive, and unpolished from the outset, and it never becomes fun despite some potential with friends or later rounds.

Friction: no tutorial or explanation; boring first few waves; repetitive gameplay; clunky mechanics; unbalanced difficulty; no character progression on loss.

Disappointed Genre Veteran: Compares the game to established titles, critically evaluates execution, expects high-quality gameplay and polish. Motivation: Seeking a polished, competitive zombie shooter experience comparable to Killing Floor, WWZ, or Back 4 Blood. Stance: no buy.

Achievement Hunter: Exploits easy mechanics to complete the game quickly, uses cheese strategies, values rapid 100% completion over normal gameplay. Motivation: Quick and effortless achievement completion to increase profile completion or for farming achievements. Stance: deep sale.

Steam Deck: The game requires manual control configuration on Steam Deck due to sluggish default controls and no community profile. Combined with a lack of tutorial and poor overall quality, the experience demands significant tinkering before becoming playable.

Often acquired via bundles: Many reviewers acquired the game through bundles or for free, often as part of a multi-game purchase. This suggests a significant portion of the player base did not pay full price and may have lower expectations.

Not worth full price: Several reviews indicate that the game is only worth buying at a discounted price, as its quality does not justify the asking price. Some call it abandoned and not worth the money at full price.

Poor clone of classics: The game is often compared to popular co-op shooters like Killing Floor, Left 4 Dead, and Back 4 Blood. Reviewers frequently label it a poor clone or rip-off of these titles, noting it is worse in every way.

Short and easy completion: Achievements are very easy to obtain, with all of them achievable in under three hours. The game can be fully completed in about five hours, but many finish it in one to three hours.

Feels like unfinished project: The game is frequently described as feeling like a rushed student project, an alpha build, or a quick cash grab. Many features are incomplete, and the overall quality resembles early development rather than a finished product.