- Fun, engaging gameplay with good value.
- Appealing and unique art style.
- Fresh survival with engaging combat.
- Lacks depth and engaging content.
- Poor optimization and performance issues.
- Stiff and unappealing animations.
Verdict
Mixed
Summary
Positive 63% · Negative 37%. Score: 37 / 100
Positives:
- The game is generally considered enjoyable and fun, especially given its reasonable price. Players appreciate its entertaining gameplay, humor, and engaging elements, making it a worthwhile experience overall.
- The game features a distinct and appealing art style, often described as steampunk or low-poly, contributing to a unique and immersive atmosphere. The world is visually pleasing and well-designed, enhancing the overall player experience.
- The game offers a fresh take on the survival genre with engaging zombie combat, base building, and resource management. Players enjoy the rewarding combat mechanics and the challenge of defending against night attacks.
- The game is optimized for smooth performance even on lower-end PCs, making it accessible to a wide range of players. Its simple and relaxing gameplay is suitable for both newcomers and those who prefer a less stressful experience.
- The developers are highly responsive and committed to improving the game, addressing issues quickly and actively engaging with the community. This dedication enhances the player experience and demonstrates a commitment to quality.
Negatives:
- Numerous players report significant performance and optimization issues, including low and unstable frame rates, lag, and stuttering. These problems occur across different hardware configurations and are exacerbated in multiplayer, making the game difficult or unplayable for some. Some players also report ghosting and shaking when the frame rate exceeds 60fps.
- Several reviews mention that character and zombie animations are stiff, lacking, or visually unappealing. This contributes to a feeling that the game is unfinished or of low quality. Some reviews specifically compare the animations unfavorably to those of cheap mobile games.
- The game is criticized for lacking depth, engaging content, and a clear sense of purpose. Some reviewers feel that the gameplay becomes monotonous quickly, with zombie killing feeling pointless due to a lack of meaningful rewards. The game needs more engaging content to sustain long-term interest.
- Multiplayer mode is plagued with instability, connection problems, and bugs. Some players are unable to launch multiplayer, while others experience severe lag and desynchronization. The cooperative mode is described as functioning terribly.
- Some reviewers feel that the released game offers little to no new content or changes compared to the demo version. This leads to disappointment and a sense of wasted money, especially for those who expected significant improvements or additions.
Gameplay:
- The core gameplay loop revolves around gathering resources, crafting items and base upgrades, and defending a mobile base against zombie hordes, especially at night. Blueprints for upgrades are found through exploration. Base building is relatively simple.
- Players have limited control over the vehicle's movement, primarily controlling gas and brake while an NPC steers. This, combined with marked trails, makes the world feel linear, like a corridor.
- The game is a 4-player co-op survival-adventure game where players build and maintain a mobile fortress traversing diverse biomes, solving puzzles, and fighting zombies. One reviewer suspects the game is better in co-op, but didn't understand how to play in co-op.
- The player character does not need to eat, drink, or sleep. Food items are used to restore health and provide buffs, such as stamina regeneration.
- The game features a limited variety of zombie types. The player can kick zombies, but the lack of fall damage reduces the effectiveness of this ability.
Performance:
- The main menu is causing excessive hardware usage for some players. This could indicate an optimization issue within the menu system itself.
Recommendations:
- Reviewers are optimistic about the game's future, noting active developers who listen to feedback. They anticipate and hope for continued updates, new content, and overall growth of the project, potentially leading to a dedicated fan base.
Miscellaneous:
- The game is in early access, which means it is still under development. Reviewers acknowledge that balancing, content, and other improvements are expected as the development progresses.
- Players are having difficulty distinguishing between harvestable resources and decorative objects, specifically mentioning the difficulty in locating flint. The tutorial also lacks guidance on resource gathering, making it harder for new players.
- The developers are actively communicating with the community and working on updates based on player feedback. This is a positive sign, indicating that the game is likely to improve over time.
- The game is similar to other survival games like Raft Survival. To stand out, the game needs to offer unique features or improvements over existing titles in the genre.
- Reviewers are requesting a creative workshop feature to allow for more freedom and options in building construction. This would allow players to further customize their bases and express their creativity.
