Info about Outpost: Infinity Siege: Official game description: Vanguard Edition ================ **The Standard Edition is not be able to be upgraded to Vanguard Edition.** The Vanguard Edition includes: \- The "Outpost: Infinity Siege" base game \- Exclusive outpost component blueprint: Type 30 CIWS (unlocks with CIWS research) \- Exclusive outpost component blueprint: Viper Chain Gun (unlocks with Twin Barrel Light Guns research) \- Exclusive outpost component: Wings of Freedom (decorative) \- Exclusive outpost paint: Gold (decorative) About the Game ============== **Outpost Building** -------------------- Explore the world, gather resources, merge and upgrade outpost units to build your own outpost. **Unique Weapon** ----------------- Fully exploit the value of the unique XEN Firearm with different protoslag attributes, and utilize ammunition with diverse performance. **Loot & Farm** --------------- Enjoy the abundant difficulty levels, diverse gameplay features, and distinctive maps of the exploration mode. Venture deep into the brand new zones full of hazards and opportunities, and harvest powerful outpost units. **Co-op Feature** ----------------- Fight alongside friends on Recovery Day, or strive together to survive infinite waves of monsters in Endless mode till the last moment. Release date: 26 Mar, 2024 Categories: First-Person Shooter, Tower Defense, Base Building, Resource Management, Cooperative Multiplayer, Weapon Customization, Looter Shooter, Extraction Shooter - Hardware Profile: No data Feature extractions: - Community Price: No data - Playtime Metrics: No data - Time-to-fun: No data - Player Archetypes: No data Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category. Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews. What players like: - Unique, fun, and engaging gameplay (weight 0.92): The game offers a unique and engaging blend of genres, including FPS, tower defense, base building, and resource management. Players find the core gameplay loop addictive and satisfying, with a good balance of action, strategy, and progression. The game's concept and execution are praised for their originality and potential. - Rewarding base building mechanics (weight 0.29): Base building is a central and enjoyable mechanic, allowing for extensive customization and strategic design. Players find it rewarding to construct and upgrade their bases, experiment with different layouts, and watch their creations effectively defend against enemy waves. The outpost system provides a strong sense of progression and accomplishment. - Excellent tower defense implementation (weight 0.2): The game successfully combines tower defense elements with other genres, offering strategic depth and engaging combat. Players enjoy the challenge of defending against waves of enemies, strategically placing turrets, and directly participating in the action. The game is considered a standout in the tower defense genre. - Deep weapon customization system (weight 0.15): The game features extensive weapon customization options, allowing players to modify their weapons with various attachments and create unique builds. This system adds depth and variety to the gameplay, encouraging experimentation and strategic decision-making. The ability to tailor weapons to specific playstyles is a major draw for many players. - Rewarding progression and upgrades (weight 0.11): The game offers a satisfying sense of progression, with players able to upgrade their characters, bases, and equipment over time. This progression system keeps players engaged and motivated to continue playing, as they unlock new abilities, structures, and content. The game's difficulty scales well, providing a constant challenge as players advance. - Satisfying turret-based gameplay (weight 0.11): Players find it satisfying to build and upgrade turrets, watching them effectively eliminate enemies. The visual spectacle of large cannons and bullets firing from the base is enjoyable, creating a sense of power and accomplishment. The variety of turrets available allows for diverse defensive strategies. - Variety of game modes (weight 0.04): The game offers a variety of game modes, including co-op, endless mode, and challenge runs, providing replayability and diverse gameplay experiences. The combination of FPS, tower defense, and RTS elements creates a varied gameplay experience, catering to different playstyles. The availability of multiplayer enhances the game's appeal. - Satisfying base-building and scavenging (weight 0.04): The game provides a satisfying experience for players who enjoy base building, resource scavenging, and strategic combat. The feeling of gradually strengthening the base, collecting teammates, and gathering equipment is very rewarding. The game scratches the extraction shooter itch without the misery of similar titles. - Creative building and combat options (weight 0.03): The game allows players to build comical drones, construct land-based strike platforms, and pilot mechs. This freedom in choosing play styles, such as mega-fortress, bot army, or super soldier, adds to the game's appeal. The ability to customize and control these elements provides a unique and engaging experience. - Enjoyable co-op multiplayer (weight 0.03): The game features online co-op multiplayer, allowing players to team up with friends or other players to tackle missions and defend against waves of enemies. Co-op play enhances teamwork and accelerates progress, making it a highly beneficial experience, especially for new players. The ability to create private or public lobbies provides flexibility for co-op play. - Improved since initial release (weight 0.03): Some reviews indicate that the game is not as bad as initially expected and has shown improvement over time. The developers have made progress with polishing the game, and the current version is considered acceptable by some. However, this point receives a reduced score due to its general and non-specific nature. - Balanced and adjustable difficulty (weight 0.03): The game offers a balanced difficulty curve, with the early and mid-game providing the most challenge. The resource balance between building resources and combat power is well-executed, creating a satisfying gameplay loop. The ability to choose risk levels allows players to tailor the game's difficulty to their available time. - Impressive visuals and grand scale (weight 0.02): The game features impressive visuals, grand scenes, and a cinematic intro, creating a positive first impression. The graphics are described as incredible, with lots of explosions and a detailed world. The game emphasizes spectacle and special effects, contributing to an immersive and engaging experience. - Enjoyable and rewarding grind (weight 0.02): Some players find the grind in the game to be fun and enjoyable, especially when it leads to obtaining specific loot for desired builds. The feeling of accumulation through grinding is satisfying, and the grind is considered decent and not mind-numbing by some. However, this point receives a reduced score due to its subjective nature. Common complaints: - Excessive, tedious grind (weight 0.93): The game suffers from excessive grinding due to repetitive gameplay loops, resource scarcity, and a lack of map variety. This is exacerbated by a weak tutorial, unclear mechanics, and an unrewarding early game, leading to player frustration and a sense of wasted time. Some reviews show signs of review bombing due to the high number of mentions of 'grind' without specific details. - Flawed AI and pathfinding (weight 0.65): The game features flawed AI for both enemies and turrets, leading to illogical behavior and frustrating gameplay. Players are forced to micromanage ammunition and deal with pathfinding issues, detracting from the strategic tower defense aspects. - Poor presentation and execution (weight 0.42): The game suffers from poor presentation, including weak character models and animations, cringeworthy dialogue, and subpar voice acting. These issues detract from the overall immersion and enjoyment of the game, making it difficult for players to connect with the story and characters. - Repetitive missions, illogical design (weight 0.2): The game suffers from repetitive mission design and limited map variety, leading to a sense of monotony. The game's structure and design choices often feel illogical and frustrating, diminishing the overall player experience. - Punishing death and loss (weight 0.12): The game features a punishing death mechanic that results in significant progress loss, including equipment and resources. This harsh penalty, combined with expensive insurance costs, creates a frustrating negative feedback loop for players. - Poorly implemented new content (weight 0.07): New content and updates often introduce unwanted game modes, increase difficulty, and negatively impact the core gameplay experience. These changes can feel forced and detract from the aspects of the game that players enjoy. - Poor translation and localization (weight 0.07): The game suffers from poor translation and localization, making it difficult to understand mechanics and follow the story. This issue is compounded by a lack of language options for some players, further hindering their ability to enjoy the game. - Cumbersome outpost system (weight 0.07): The outpost system is cumbersome and poorly explained, with inaccurate difficulty recommendations and tedious management requirements. The weight-bearing system and illogical component requirements further discourage experimentation and player creativity. - Inconsistent, low-quality visuals (weight 0.06): The game suffers from visual inconsistencies and low-quality assets, including poorly designed character models and awkward animations. These graphical issues detract from the overall immersiveness and polish of the game. - Inaccessible loot and enemies (weight 0.05): The game has bugs that cause loot and enemies to spawn in inaccessible locations, preventing players from progressing or obtaining necessary resources. These issues detract from the overall exploration and scavenging experience. - Artificial playtime inflation (weight 0.04): The game's structure and mechanics feel designed to artificially increase playtime, resembling a pay-to-win mobile game. This approach diminishes the feeling of accomplishment and makes the game feel more like a grind than an enjoyable experience. Gameplay feedback: - Unique blend of genres (weight 0.57): The game uniquely blends FPS, tower defense, base building, and RTS elements. Players alternate between exploring maps for resources, constructing defenses, and engaging in combat to defend their base against waves of enemies. The tower defense aspect involves strategically placing turrets and managing resources like ammunition and power. - Scavenging and resource gathering loop (weight 0.29): A core gameplay loop involves embarking on "tours" or expeditions to scavenge for resources, blueprints, and gear. Players explore procedurally-generated maps, manage their inventory, and extract their loot. Manual looting yields more resources than automated collection. - Customizable mobile outpost construction (weight 0.25): Players design and customize a mobile outpost or base, fortifying it with various defenses. Base building involves placing walls, floors, production facilities, and turrets. Support pillars are crucial for increasing the base's power and capabilities. - Lacking initial guidance/tutorial (weight 0.07): The game introduces mechanics gradually, but the tutorial is insufficient and many mechanics are never properly explained. Players must often rely on trial and error or external resources to fully understand the game. This lack of guidance can make the game initially challenging. - Grindy upgrade and research system (weight 0.05): The game features an upgrade and research system that is rewarding. However, game progression requires considerable time investment and is quite the grind; expect at least 40 hours to get into the initial stages of base automation, and at least 80 hours to unlock the initial parts of end-game. - Endless mode for base defense (weight 0.04): The game features an endless mode called "Infinity Siege" where players defend their base against increasingly difficult waves of enemies. This mode offers a rogue-like experience for leveling squad members and testing outposts. The difficulty scales with the value of loot being extracted. - Risk versus reward loot system (weight 0.02): The more loot you acquire, the more challenging the game becomes. At the end of each tour is a tower-defense stage that scales in difficulty based on the amount of loot taken back to base. It's better to do short runs on higher-difficulty levels for better loot. - Character recruitment and management (weight 0.02): Players can recruit additional units who are stronger than the main character but risk permanent death. Teammates join through a gacha-like system. Players can send recruited characters on 'missions' similar to XCOM. - Multiplayer co-op support (weight 0.02): The game supports multiplayer co-op. Loot is shared in co-op, except for equipment (weapons, armor sets). In multiplayer, experienced players can give equipment or supplies to others. - Roguelite challenge mode (weight 0.02): Return to Dawn Base mode offers roguelite-like challenges with premade outposts and random operators, combining exploration and recovery days in a single mission. Returning to base triggers a tower defense mission where the intensity depends on the amount of loot acquired. - Energy-based map traversal (weight 0.02): Players collect energy to skip locations, but this process is often boring and requires extensive map traversal. After completing a stage once, an auto-clear function becomes available, consuming more exploration resources (power) to clear the stage automatically. - Exploration and resource collection (weight 0.02): Players collect supplies from abandoned areas while fighting hostile XEN. The player is alone and must find their own resources since there are no supply lines. The game includes an inventory system similar to Stalker, which is expandable through research. - Base defense and extraction (weight 0.02): It's usually possible to retreat to the base, where enemies are quickly eliminated. The base is permanent, meaning it resets after each sortie even if destroyed. The value of collected items determines the length and difficulty of the base defense. Performance notes: - Poor optimization causes performance issues (weight 0.35): The game suffers from significant and widespread performance issues, including FPS drops, stuttering, lag, and crashes. These issues are exacerbated by large bases, numerous enemies, and intense combat situations, even on high-end PCs. Some players have found temporary solutions by adjusting graphics settings or BIOS settings, but the underlying problem of poor optimization remains a major concern. - Game is prone to crashing (weight 0.28): The game is prone to crashing, sometimes requiring system restarts. While some crashes are recoverable, others result in lost progress. Some players have found that setting up virtual memory can help alleviate the crashing issue, but it does not eliminate it entirely. - Multiplayer suffers from lag (weight 0.27): Multiplayer performance is negatively affected by poor connections, leading to lag, teleporting units, and damage from unknown sources. This makes the game less enjoyable for players with slower internet speeds or when playing with others who have poor connections. - Runs well on some systems (weight 0.26): Some players report smooth performance and stable frame rates, even on high or ultra settings. These positive experiences are often associated with specific hardware configurations (e.g., high-end GPUs and CPUs) or specific game settings. However, these reports are less frequent than those detailing performance problems. - Long loading times experienced (weight 0.25): The game suffers from long loading times, especially when installed on an HDD. This can disrupt the flow of gameplay and lead to frustration for players. - Frame generation causes artifacts (weight 0.23): The game utilizes frame generation technologies like FSR 3.0, which can introduce visual artifacts such as phantom trails. While these technologies can improve performance, they may also detract from the overall visual experience. - Game produces DirectX errors (weight 0.23): Some reviewers reported that the game produced a win64-shipping error or a DirectX error related to DX12SM6. These errors may indicate issues with the game's compatibility with certain systems or graphics drivers. Recommendations: - Unpolished, buggy, needs optimization (weight 0.66): The game is plagued by bugs, performance issues, and a lack of polish, leading to frequent crashes and frustration. Many reviewers suggest waiting for significant updates or a sequel before considering a purchase. Some reviewers with high-end PCs report fewer issues. - Buy on sale, if at all (weight 0.64): Many reviewers recommend purchasing the game only on sale due to its flaws and unfinished state. Some suggest waiting for a significant discount (75-90% off) or considering other options. Playing with friends can improve the experience. - Potential, needs more development (weight 0.63): Reviewers express hope for future improvements, updates, and a potential sequel to address the game's shortcomings. Common desires include better optimization, more content, and a more polished experience. Some suggest focusing on core gameplay improvements rather than adding superfluous features. - Cheats improve the experience (weight 0.57): Several reviewers recommend using cheat engines to bypass tedious resource gathering or other frustrating mechanics. This suggests that the intended gameplay loop is not always enjoyable and that players may need to circumvent it to have a better experience. This may be a sign of poor game design. - Desire for more content (weight 0.08): Many reviewers express a desire for more content, including new locations, turrets, and story elements. There is also a hope that the developers will continue to support the game with updates and address existing issues. Some reviewers are particularly interested in a sequel that expands on the game's potential. - Personal 'Game of the Year' (weight 0.07): Some reviewers express strong positive sentiments, calling the game a "hidden gem" or even their "game of the year." However, these opinions are often based on personal preference and may not reflect the overall consensus. These reviews often lack specific details about what makes the game so enjoyable. - Improve specific game mechanics (weight 0.04): Reviewers suggest specific improvements to various game mechanics, such as the RTS aspects, turret design, resource gathering, and tutorials. Some suggest focusing on perfecting existing mechanics before adding more content. There are also suggestions to study other successful games in the FPS and tower defense genres for inspiration. - Hopes to follow 'No Man's Sky' (weight 0.02): Some reviewers draw comparisons to other games like "No Man's Sky," expressing hope that "Outpost: Infinity Siege" can follow a similar path of improvement through updates. There's also anticipation for a potential sequel that builds upon the foundation of the first game. These reviews suggest that the game has potential but needs further development to reach its full potential. Other player notes: - Active development, frequent updates (weight 0.09): The developers are actively updating the game, addressing bugs, and adding new content based on player feedback. Frequent patches and communication through platforms like Discord indicate a commitment to improving the game post-launch. This ongoing support is a positive sign for the game's future. - Incomplete, ongoing development, sequel planned (weight 0.08): The game is considered unfinished, with some reviewers feeling it's more like an early access title despite not being labeled as such. Development is ongoing, with frequent updates and a sequel in the works to address initial shortcomings. However, some express concern that the focus on a sequel may lead to the abandonment of the current game. - Story is weak or incomplete (weight 0.06): The game's story receives mixed reviews, with some finding it adequate as context for gameplay, while others criticize it as disjointed, generic, or nonsensical. The narrative may be incomplete or abruptly end, leaving players wanting more. The focus is more on gameplay than a compelling narrative. - Unique genre-blending gameplay (weight 0.03): The game combines elements from various genres, such as base-building, RTS, FPS, and tower defense, creating a unique hybrid experience. This mashup of mechanics and innovative gameplay design sets it apart, offering players a novel approach to familiar genres. - Futuristic setting, AI conflict (weight 0.02): The game is set in a post-apocalyptic or futuristic world where humanity is at war with machines or AI. Players often take on the role of a commander or leader fighting against the AI threat. The setting features advanced technology, mechs, and other futuristic elements. - Single-player and multiplayer options (weight 0.01): The game offers both single-player and online co-op multiplayer options, catering to different player preferences. While some story missions may be single-player only, the game provides sufficient satisfaction in both modes. This allows players to choose their preferred way to experience the game. - Systems outweigh gameplay loop (weight 0.01): The game has a strong focus on its systems, but the gameplay loop to use them is relatively small. Some elements feel like mobile game design, which doesn't fit well in a single-player game. - Chinese-made, Unreal Engine (weight 0.01): The game is developed by a Chinese team using the Unreal Engine, potentially utilizing assets from the Unreal Engine Asset Store. This information provides context about the game's development origin and technical foundation. - Grindy, luck-based difficulty (weight 0.01): The game requires a lot of grinding, and the difficulty seems to boil down to how many times you can get unlucky in a row. Emotions: No emotions}