Info about Carrier Command 2:

Official game description:
Note: This game can be played in non-virtual reality mode, and also in virtual reality.  
Carrier Command 2 is Strategy, Planning and Teamwork on a scale that is both engaging and manageable. True to MicroProse's heritage, Carrier Command 2 is all about meaningful decisions.  
**
Command and Control
-------------------
**Take command of a carrier and operate its systems to launch your offensive and conquer the Archipelago. Get in the shoes of an admiral and lead from the front.  
**
Strategize
----------
**Gather intel from your vehicles’ radars, pick your tools of the trade, and launch your attacks where the enemy presence is thinner. The approach you take to a situation will play a big part in the outcome.  
**
Plan
----
**Once you have taken an island you will need to exploit and defend the resources it provides. Ensuring these supply lines remain open will be key to your survival. Think ahead.  
**
Teamwork
--------
**Make the most of different unit types synergies and create combined arms assaults to efficiently win battles. On top of that, get into each and every vehicle and take part in the action!  
**
An illustrious heritage
-----------------------
**Carrier Command is an ’80s strategy classic well known for its unique blend of strategy and vehicle simulation. The legend is back!

Release date: 10 Aug, 2021

Categories: Strategy, Ship Management, Cooperative Multiplayer, Resource Management, Unit Management, Tactical Combat, Vehicle Piloting, Simulation


- Hardware Profile: No data
Feature extractions:
- Community Price: No data
- Playtime Metrics: No data
- Time-to-fun: No data
- Player Archetypes: No data


Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category.
Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews.
What players like:
- Exceptional Co-op & Strategic Depth (weight 1): Players consistently praise the game's unique co-op experience, highlighting the depth of strategy and immersion when working with friends. The simultaneous control of air, land, and sea forces from a carrier, often across multiple players, creates a thrilling and rewarding experience.
- Unique Visual & Audio Style (weight 0.79): The game's distinctive low-poly, pseudo-retro graphics and high-quality sound design are consistently praised. This aesthetic choice contributes significantly to the immersive atmosphere and overall charm of the game.
- Active Modding Community (weight 0.69): The availability of mods and Steam Workshop integration significantly enhances the game. The modding community is active and contributes to improving and refreshing game content.
- Enjoyable Solo Experience (weight 0.69): Despite being geared towards multiplayer, the single-player mode is reported to be enjoyable and manageable. It requires strategic thinking, planning, and timing, allowing players to still have fun alone.
- Good Potential, Initial Appeal (weight 0.65): Many players acknowledge the game's strong concept and significant potential for future content. While enjoyable initially, some feedback hints that its long-term depth might benefit from further development.
- Immersive Carrier Command (weight 0.29): The core mechanic of commanding an aircraft carrier, managing its systems, and deploying various units is highly engaging. Reviewers appreciate the detailed, interactive bridge and the sense of scale and command it provides.
- Fun Island Capture Loop (weight 0.06): The core gameplay loop of capturing randomly generated islands for resources and blueprints is described as captivating and replayable. Varied enemy defenses and unit types keep the experience fresh.
- Interactive & Tactile UI (weight 0.04): The game's user interface, characterized by physical buttons, screens, and dials on the bridge, enhances immersion. Players enjoy the tactile nature of controls, which become intuitive over time.
- Improved Stability & Patches (weight 0.03): Recent updates have addressed many initial bugs and AI glitches, leading to a more stable and enjoyable experience. Developers are seen as responsive to community feedback.

Common complaints:
- Slow pace and repetitive gameplay (weight 0.5): The game suffers from an excessively slow pace, with long travel times, slow unit deployments, and tedious waiting periods, especially in single-player where fast-forward options are absent. This leads to repetitive gameplay and a feeling that the game does not respect player time.
- High price, low content/value (weight 0.45): Many players feel the game is significantly overpriced for the amount of content and polish it offers. The high price point also makes it challenging to convince friends to purchase, further exacerbating multiplayer engagement issues.
- Not designed for solo play (weight 0.36): The game is widely criticized for being extremely difficult, tedious, and often unplayable for single players. It demands excessive micromanagement and task saturation, making it clear it's intended for multiplayer, yet fails to provide adequate support for solo adventurers.
- Limited development and updates (weight 0.32): Players express concern over the lack of substantial content updates and new features, with many believing the game's development has stalled or been 'dropped'. This contributes to the perception of limited replayability and value.
- Steep learning curve, poor tutorials (weight 0.29): Players consistently report a very steep learning curve due to complex mechanics, unintuitive interfaces, and a severely lacking in-game tutorial. Many feel overwhelmed, particularly solo players, requiring external resources like Google to understand core gameplay.
- Unplayable VR experience (weight 0.26): The VR mode is heavily criticized as 'unplayable' due to abysmal controls, nauseating motion, and a lack of proper adaptation for a virtual reality environment. Many consider the VR support to be false advertising.
- Issues with AI carrier and combat balance (weight 0.24): The enemy AI carrier is often seen as unrealistic, with unlimited resources and unfair advantages in capturing islands. Combat balance issues also make some units overpowered or underwhelming, affecting strategic depth and enjoyment.
- Poor AI for friendly and enemy units (weight 0.22): Both friendly and enemy AI units are frequently described as 'dumb' or 'idiotic', exhibiting poor pathfinding, inefficient combat engagement, and requiring constant player micromanagement. This detracts from the strategic experience and can be frustrating.
- Limited modding support (weight 0.07): Modding support is considered poor and limited, primarily allowing for cosmetic or UI tweaks rather than deeper gameplay or balance changes. This restriction hinders community creativity and potential for game longevity.
- Flawed logistics and barge system (weight 0.07): The barge system, crucial for logistics, is reported to be slow, buggy, and poorly designed. This leads to frustrating supply issues and negatively impacts overall game pacing and player experience.
- Unimpressive and basic graphics (weight 0.06): The game's graphics are consistently described as basic, underwhelming, and not up to modern standards. While some understand the retro intention, graphical glitches and a lack of visual depth are noted.

Gameplay feedback:
- Complex Carrier Command Gameplay (weight 0.26): The game centers around commanding an amphibious assault ship, managing its systems, deploying diverse air and ground units, and overseeing logistics to conquer islands. It combines real-time vehicle control with strategic and logistical management in a futuristic warfare setting.
- Multiplayer Focus & Co-op Value (weight 0.18): The game is heavily designed for multiplayer, especially co-op, where friends can share the extensive workload of managing the carrier and its units. While playable solo, it becomes significantly harder and is best experienced with 2-4 players.
- Island Conquest and Resource Management (weight 0.14): A core gameplay loop involves conquering numerous procedurally generated islands, each offering resources, defensive benefits, or unlocking crucial blueprints for new weapons and units. Players must manage tactical operations, unit micro-management, and strategic planning for island logistics and supplies.
- Mixed RTS/Simulation Gameplay (weight 0.12): The game blends RTS elements with vehicular simulation, allowing both macro-management and direct unit control. It's closer to a vehicular milsim due to manual vehicle control but lacks extreme simulation complexity, providing an immersive yet accessible experience.
- Steep Learning Curve & Deliberate Pace (weight 0.1): The game has a significant learning curve, requiring patience and deliberate thinking to master its various systems and controls. It's a slow-paced, often tedious experience, but can offer cinematic tension and demands players focus on one task at a time, especially in solo play.
- Scouting and Target Prioritization (weight 0.08): Effective island assault often begins with scouting using aircraft like the Albatross or Manta to identify and tag enemy units. Prioritizing targets, such as taking out airfields with cruise missiles or torpedoing enemy boats from afar, is critical for success, especially on higher difficulty islands.
- Diverse Unit & Weapon Management (weight 0.06): Players manage a variety of units including different types of UAVs, tanks, and helicopters, each with specialized functions. It's essential to learn which vehicles, weapons, and ammunition combinations are most effective for various combat scenarios, particularly against different island defenses.
- Long Gameplay & Solo Playability (weight 0.05): A single playthrough of the campaign can last well over 40 hours. While designed for multiplayer, the game offers a single-player campaign that can be completed solo, though it requires significant multi-tasking and patience.

Performance notes:
- Excellent performance on low-end PCs (weight 0.04): Many players report that the game is very well-optimized and runs smoothly even on older or less powerful computer systems, indicating good accessibility for a wide range of hardware.
- Game stability issues (weight 0.03): Some players experience game crashes during gameplay or after extended sessions, which can lead to a degraded experience. A specific issue with frame rate degradation over time was also noted.
- Small file and save sizes (weight 0.02): Players appreciate the game's relatively small installation size and minimal save file sizes, which is convenient for disk space management.
- Potential AMD driver conflicts (weight 0.02): There are reports suggesting that the game may perform poorly or crash specifically on systems with modern AMD graphics drivers. This indicates a potential hardware-specific optimization or compatibility issue.
- HOTAS support requires third-party tools (weight 0.01): To properly use Hands-On Throttle-And-Stick (HOTAS) controllers, players need to rely on external software, which adds an extra step for peripheral setup.
- Excellent Linux compatibility via Proton (weight 0.01): The game performs very well on Linux operating systems when run through Proton, making it accessible to a wider audience of PC gamers.
- Robust netcode (weight 0.01): The game's networking code is praised for its reliability and stability, which is crucial for a smooth multiplayer experience.
- Minor vehicle control jerkiness (weight 0.01): A slight visual jerkiness has been observed when players take manual control of vehicles, suggesting a minor animation or rendering inconsistency in specific scenarios.
- Loud initial volume settings (weight 0.01): The default volume levels for music and sound effects are excessively high upon first launch, requiring manual adjustment by players.

Recommendations:
- Best with Friends or Co-op (weight 0.3): Many players emphasize that the game's enjoyment significantly increases when played with friends in co-op or multiplayer. Solo play is generally not recommended, with some even stating the game is only truly playable with others. This indicates a strong social component is key to the intended experience.
- Buy on Sale (weight 0.17): A significant number of reviews suggest purchasing the game only when it is on sale or heavily discounted. Players feel the full price is often too high for the current state of the game, making a sale price a crucial factor for recommendation.
- Future Content & Fixes Needed (weight 0.17): Players express a desire for more content updates, continued developer support, optimization, and fixes, particularly for multiplayer issues. Some reviewers conditionally recommend the game based on future improvements.
- Mixed General Recommendation (weight 0.16): Overall sentiment for recommendation is highly mixed, ranging from strong recommendations to strong disrecommendations, often depending on factors like playing with friends, purchase price, or patience for issues. This indicates a polarizing experience for players.
- Niche Tactical Gameplay (weight 0.11): The game strongly appeals to a specific audience interested in immersive, tactical, and strategic gameplay, particularly those who enjoy military strategy, logistics, or classic demanding PC wargames. It's recommended for players seeking a unique, hardcore experience.
- VR Mode Not Recommended (weight 0.07): Several players explicitly advise against buying or playing the game in VR, suggesting that the experience is significantly better on a flat monitor. This indicates issues or an unoptimized experience within the VR mode.
- Consider Alternative Carrier Games (weight 0.05): Some reviewers suggest alternative games like Hostile Waters: Antaeus Rising, Carrier Command: Gaea Mission, Sea Power, or Nebulous: Fleet Command for players seeking different types of carrier or naval RTS experiences, especially for solo play or specific features.
- Mods Improve Experience (weight 0.03): Players highly recommend using specific mods, particularly those that enhance the UI, provide more information, or offer quality-of-life improvements like automatic scanning. Some consider certain mods essential for a better gameplay experience.

Other player notes:
- Game's niche appeal and low player count (weight 0.07): Players note the game's niche appeal, which likely contributes to its low player count. This makes it challenging to find other players, especially for multiplayer, and raises concerns about the game's future and potential for further development.
- Cooperative play is preferred (weight 0.06): The game experience significantly improves when played with friends, making it more fun and potentially easier. Some players expressed a desire for better LAN options or discounted friend packs to facilitate group play.
- Suggests gameplay enhancements (weight 0.06): Players propose numerous additions like AI upgrades for crafts, base-building, munitions plants, and a variety of research/upgrade options for carrier systems. They also suggest quality-of-life features such as auto-targeting and auto-spotting, along with more aircraft and the ability to stow them for increased immersion.
- Need for ongoing updates and support (weight 0.05): Players express a strong desire for continued official updates and support to address existing issues and expand content. While the game still receives some updates, many feel that fundamental gameplay fixes are lacking, with mods currently bridging the gap.
- Visuals and unit design feedback (weight 0.04): Some players find the graphics good, but others suggest improvements in detail and unit design. There's a sentiment that the initial stylistic impression might require some adjustment, but shouldn't overshadow the game's quality.
- Historical context and future hopes (weight 0.04): The game is recognized as a spiritual successor to the 1988 original, setting high expectations for a carrier simulation. Players appreciate this lineage and some are already looking forward to a potential Carrier Command 3.
- Desire for PvP mode (weight 0.03): Many players believe that adding a Player vs. Player (PvP) mode would greatly enhance the game, potentially making it 'perfect' or 'fantastic'.
- Accessibility and difficulty options (weight 0.03): Players suggest implementing different difficulty modes (easy, normal, hard) that adjust AI island ratios to suit various player skill levels. There's also a general observation that the game has a regular learning curve.
- Comparison to other games (weight 0.01): The game is compared to titles like Void Crew, Overcooked, or Unrailed, especially appealing to milsim enthusiasts. These comparisons help contextualize its gameplay style for potential new players.
- Developer and publisher information (weight 0.01): Some reviews simply mention that the game is developed by Geometa and published by MicroProse, and that it comes from the same developers as Stormworks. This is mostly factual information rather than feedback.
- Potential for fun (weight 0.01): Players indicate that the game has the potential to be fun, and may have been enjoyable during its prime. This suggests that while it may currently lack polish or active player base, the core experience holds promise.
- Frequent saving is recommended (weight 0.01): Reviewers advise players to save their game progress frequently. This is a practical tip for new players, suggesting the game may have moments where progress can be lost or that it is a common practice.

Emotions:
- Satisfaction (weight 0.33): Players are highly satisfied due to the game's excellent overall quality, deep strategic gameplay, and unique blend of genres like RTS and simulation. The rewarding challenge, high replayability, and enhanced experience when playing in co-op contribute significantly to this positive emotion, often exceeding initial expectations. Many also appreciate the value for money, the rich and polished content, and successful execution of complex strategies.
- Frustration (weight 0.3): Frustration stems primarily from poor AI, a significant lack of comprehensive tutorials making solo play overwhelming, and numerous game-breaking bugs including crashes and multiplayer connection issues. Tedious micromanagement, slow logistics, and imbalanced unit capabilities further exacerbate this, making the experience cumbersome and often unplayable for single players.
- Disappointment (weight 0.22): Disappointment arises from unmet high expectations, especially concerning the solo play experience, which many find unviable and tedious. The perceived lack of developed content, limited updates, empty multiplayer servers, and critical bugs lead players to feel the game has wasted its potential. A common sentiment is that the high price does not match the available content or the game's unfinished state.
- Excitement (weight 0.15): Players feel excitement from the game's unique concept, immersive atmosphere, and incredibly fun co-op gameplay, often describing it as a 'gem' or 'amazing.' The depth, complexity, and strategic elements, combined with the thrill of commanding a carrier strike group, contribute to a highly engaging and addictive experience. Anticipation for future updates and mod support also fuels this emotion.
- Enjoyment (weight 0.12): Enjoyment is largely driven by playing with friends, the strategic depth of the gameplay, and the engaging learning curve. Players find the core gameplay loop, unique blend of RTS and first-person elements, and sandbox design to be fun, especially when expectations are adjusted. The amazing music and overall atmosphere also enhance the positive experience.
- Appreciation (weight 0.07): Appreciation is felt for the game's bold design, unique experience, and deep strategic elements. Players value the strong atmosphere, effective multiplayer, and direct control capabilities, alongside the modding community's efforts to keep the game alive. The developers' ambition and the game's ability to accurately simulate commanding a modern carrier flotilla are also highly appreciated.
- Joy (weight 0.05): Joy comes from the game being fun, amazing, and charming, especially when played with friends in co-op mode. The thrill of multi-angle combat, successful planning, and execution of strategies, along with dopamine-releasing moments, contribute to this emotion. Discovering the game's depth and finding a beloved game type also elicit joy.
- Hope (weight 0.05): Players express hope for future additions, more content, and continued development from the creators, including new features and game optimization. There's a strong desire for the developers to address frustrating mechanics and improve server performance, as well as a wish for the game's unique style to persist and for a more active community.
- Anger (weight 0.04): Anger stems from the game not working as intended, perceived poor design choices, and a belief in false advertising, particularly regarding VR implementation. Players are frustrated by game crashes, unresponsive bug tracking, and unacceptable multiplayer issues that have persisted for years, leading to a feeling of wasted time and developer neglect.
- Desire (weight 0.03): Players desire various improvements such as better CCTV camera resolution, more flexible troop path customization, and specific customization of vehicle keybinds. There's a strong wish for more variety in the game, a PVP mode, and more comprehensive tutorials to enhance the overall experience, with some wanting a lower price point.
- Challenge (weight 0.03): The challenge emotion is caused by the game's big learning curve, steep difficulty to master, and hardcore nature, which presents a high entry barrier. Controls require patience, and the demanding command and management aspects of the game, particularly in solo play, contribute to a difficult yet often rewarding experience.
- Enthusiasm (weight 0.02): Enthusiasm is driven by the game being described as awesome, underrated, and having incredible quality and an amazing atmosphere. Players strongly recommend the game to others, especially when played with friends, due to the overwhelmingly positive experience and high amount of playtime invested.
- Nostalgia (weight 0.02): Nostalgia is triggered by the game's connection to classic titles like the original Carrier Command, evoking childhood memories and a sense of recapturing the feeling of an old MS-DOS or Amiga game. The pixelated graphics and classic Microprose feel further reinforce this sentiment.
- Admiration (weight 0.02): Admiration is expressed for the game's detailed and unique design, the developers' expert craftsmanship, and the game's ability to create an exceptional immersive experience. Players appreciate the thematic depth, such as comparisons to 'Ender's Game,' and the game's well-made, particular qualities.
- Engagement (weight 0.01): Players experience engagement due to the game's complex and addictive gameplay loop, which requires constant vigilance and can absorb significant amounts of time. The deep involvement with customizing vehicle loadouts and the captivating nature of the experience contribute to players being thoroughly hooked.
- Boredom (weight 0.01): Boredom arises from the game's perceived lack of true fun, long wait times, and repetitive missions. Players find the slow pacing and lack of combat, especially while waiting for the carrier to reach its destination, lead to the game quickly becoming dull and lacking long-term interest after a few playthroughs.
- Confusion (weight 0.01): Confusion is caused by an incomplete and obtuse tutorial, making the game difficult to understand and learn. Unexplained controls and inconsistencies, such as unrealistic carrier speed or differences in starting vehicles across settings, further contribute to a sense of bewilderment for players.
- Annoyance (weight 0.01): Annoyance stems from a poor solo play experience, the necessity of using third-party software to address game issues, and the presence of useless features. Underwhelming naval combat also contributes to a general feeling of irritation among players.
- Longing (weight 0.01): Longing is experienced by players who desire to play the game with friends to enhance the experience and mitigate tedium. There's also a strong wish for AI teammates to improve the solo play experience, making it less overwhelming and more enjoyable.
- Discomfort (weight 0.01): Discomfort is primarily reported due to a nauseating VR experience, suggesting issues with motion sickness or visual presentation in virtual reality. The UI and room lighting also contribute to a less than ideal user experience for some players.}