Info about Bloons TD Battles 2:

Official game description:
Battle through a series of challenging Arenas and prove that you have what it takes to enter the fabled Hall of Masters and seize your glory!  
From the creators of Bloons TD 6 comes a brand new installment of the top-rated head-to-head tower defense game. Gather your Hero, choose your team of powerful Monkey Towers, and prepare to battle one on one against other players and relentless waves of Bloons!
**Competitive Tower Defense!**
------------------------------
*   Outwit and overwhelm your opponent in intense head-to-head play  
*   Balance the strength of your defenses while preparing a Bloon offensive that blitzes your opponent  
*   Countless strategic combinations can lead you to victory
**Skill Based Gameplay!**
-------------------------
*   Match with players of similar rank as you work your way through 9 unique arenas  
*   Reach Hall of Masters to battle the best on a dynamic elo-based leaderboard  
*   Earn and display unique badges each season based on progress
**Lock and Load!**
------------------
*   Select from familiar Heroes and brand new Alts with unique upgrades  
*   22 Monkey Towers with 15 unique upgrades each to customize your build  
*   Brand new Bloon send system optimizes economy building and attacks
**Build Your Bling!**
---------------------
*   Win in style as you customise your loadout from hundreds of cosmetic items  
*   Flex with unique animations, emotes, bloon skins, and more  
*   New content added every season!
And of course tons of content and new feature updates are planned to make Bloons TD Battles 2 even more awesomer. What are you waiting for? It’s time to Battle!

Release date: Nov 30, 2021

Categories: Tower Defense, Competitive Multiplayer, PvP, Strategic Building Placement, Hero Management, Meta-Progression, Pay-to-Win Monetization, Cross-platform Multiplayer

Feature scans:
- MTX: score 85; verdict: Predatory Pay-to-Win Monetization; summary: The reviews provide direct evidence that Bloons TD Battles 2 includes real-money currency purchases, VIP or club membership benefits, and paid progression that unlocks heroes, towers, and upgrades used in PvP. Many players describe the grind as intentionally slow and the cash shop as pervasive, creating pay-to-win competitive advantages. A minority of reviews say the game is still playable free-to-play and that everything can be unlocked by grinding, but the dominant monetization evidence supports a predatory pay-to-win classification.
- Wiki: score 50; verdict: Moderate Wiki Tax: Instructional Dependency; summary: The main Wiki Tax signal is instructional: users say upgrade descriptions are unclear and that the wiki is the best way to learn tower/upgrade strength. A matchmaking comment mentions a spreadsheet, but it does not describe inventory or crafting management, and a reconnect issue is a lower-tier technical lookup. No farming, drop-rate, loot-table, inventory, blueprint, or crafting evidence triggers Tier 1 or Tier 2.
- Proton/Linux: score 78; verdict: Barely Playable / Launch Blocker on Steam Deck; summary: Linux-specific feedback is sparse but negative: one user asks for the game to be added on Linux, and another reports an immediate Steam Deck crash with an in-game error. The other reviews concern missing offline mode and do not provide Linux/Proton evidence. No positive Linux or Proton reports appear in the sample.
- Steam Deck: score 75; verdict: Broken for some Steam Deck users; summary: The audit finds mixed Steam Deck evidence: some users report the game runs well and is enjoyable on the device, but at least one explicit Steam Deck review reports a startup crash with an error, and another translated review reports an immediate crash. Recurring complaints about missing offline mode and sync/progression friction add usability concerns. Under the scoring rules, an explicit Steam Deck startup crash qualifies as a broken experience despite positive reports from other users.

- Hardware Profile:
  - Summary: The low-VRAM Windows cohort mostly reports playable performance, while the higher-VRAM cohorts report crashes and lag.
  - Sample size: 119 (1% coverage)
  - Audience skew: Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
  - Windows <8GB VRAM (positive, 80 reports): Reports indicate the game runs well on low VRAM, with only minor lag mentioned.
  - Windows 8-11GB VRAM (negative, 14 reports): Reports describe frequent crashes and significant lag on this hardware range.
  - Windows 12-15GB VRAM (negative, 12 reports): Reports describe crashes after matches on this hardware range.
  - Windows 16GB+ VRAM (negative, 8 reports): Reports describe crashes on MacOS in this hardware range, with lost win streaks.
  - Caveats: 119 of 19943 reviews expose hardware metadata.; Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
Feature extractions:
- Community Price:
  - Community fair range: $0.00 - $15.00
  - Reasoning: The reviews strongly value free entry, with multiple users saying the game is worth it because it costs nothing. At the same time, comparisons to BTD6 reference a roughly $15 paid price tag, and one full-price buyer reports high satisfaction, which supports a ceiling near $15 for a comparable paid base game. Complaints about hero unlocks, currencies, and progression are monetization concerns rather than base-game price objections, so they lower confidence and suggest the fair base price should stay near free rather than rely on extra spending. This supports a community fair base-game range of about $0 to $15.
- Playtime Metrics:
  - Game completion: 30.0h
  - Story completion: N/A
  - Session length: 3.0h
  - Endgame: 46.0h
  - Reasoning: The 15-30 hour comment indicates the point where content becomes repetitive, so gameCompletion is set to 30 hours. The 46-hour report of nearly reaching the last rank provides a concrete endgame progression marker, so endgame is set to 46 hours; the separate 'hundreds of hours' comment reinforces a long competitive upgrade grind but is too vague for a precise value. The '5 minutes ... 3 hours later' anecdote supports a typical session length of about 3 hours. No review evidence supports a story completion time.
- Time-to-fun:
  - Summary: Reports most consistently describe a rough early grind and learning/unlock barrier, with enjoyment arriving after unlocking key monkeys or characters and building skill; friend matches strongly boost fun. Some players find it immediately addictive, while others never get past pay-to-win and progression complaints.
  - Stance: Clicks after
  - Anchor: Unlocking certain monkeys or characters
  - Time to anchor: N/A
  - Friction: Slow early progression and heavy grinding for towers and heroes.; Large currency and match-experience requirements for heroes and alternate variants.; Ranked or pay-to-win mismatches against higher-level players.; Inconsistent or missing tutorial guidance for basic concepts.; Late-game lag and syncing problems.; Repetitive or snowball-heavy matches with sparse balance changes.
  - Unlock drivers: Unlocking monkeys and characters with in-game currency.; Getting through the initial grind.; Building skill over time and relying less on Bloonbots.
  - Conditions: Enjoyment begins after unlocking certain monkeys or characters.; Playing with friends or in private matches increases fun.; Prior Bloons TD experience can make the game feel boring.; Solo play can feel boring without friends.; Opponent skill and matchmaking affect perceived fairness.; Late-game performance and lag affect enjoyment.; Tutorial clarity affects how quickly new players understand the game.; Free-to-play access and unlockable cosmetics affect perceived value.
- Player Archetypes:
  - Ranked PvP Duelist (buy)
    - Motivation: Competitive mastery and ranked outplays in real-time tower-defense duels.
    - Playstyle: Plays ranked 1v1, learns the meta and hotkeys, manages economy, defends precisely, and sends aggressive bloon rushes.
    - Experience: familiar
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: competitive; sweaty gamer
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Casual Free-to-Play Defender (buy)
    - Motivation: Relaxed fun and social matches without spending money.
    - Playstyle: Plays occasional casual 1v1s or friend matches, focusing on simple tower defense and bloon sending rather than competitive optimization.
    - Experience: newcomer
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Bloons Series Veteran (buy)
    - Motivation: A fresh competitive challenge that builds on Bloons TD 6 knowledge.
    - Playstyle: Applies BTD6 tower and hero knowledge to PvP, seeks more difficult matches, and evaluates balance through a series-veteran lens.
    - Experience: veteran
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: veteran; Bloons TD 6 owner
    - Reference games: Bloons TD 6
  - Grind-Wary New Player (no buy)
    - Motivation: Fair progression and access to competitive towers and heroes without paying.
    - Playstyle: Attempts to grind ranked unlocks and learn the game, but feels held back by progression costs, paywalls, and matchmaking difficulty.
    - Experience: newcomer
    - Purchase stance: no buy
    - Labels: new player
    - Reference games: N/A


Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category.
Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews.
What players like:
- Highly fun and addictive gameplay (weight 0.38): Reviewers widely describe the game as fun, enjoyable, and addictive, often noting it is a great way to pass time. The overall tone is strongly positive about the core experience.
- Best enjoyed with friends (weight 0.14): Many players highlight that playing with friends, family, or a partner significantly improves the experience. Multiplayer with friends is repeatedly called a blast or a masterpiece.
- Easy to learn and pick up (weight 0.12): Reviewers frequently note the game is simple and easy to understand, making it accessible for newcomers. Its low barrier to entry is a recurring positive.
- Overall positive but decent (weight 0.11): Some reviewers describe the game as decent or fairly good rather than exceptional. It is generally seen as a well-made but not outstanding title.
- Solid strategy gameplay (weight 0.09): The game is regarded as a truly great strategy game with fleshed-out gameplay. Strategic depth is a key selling point for reviewers.
- Engaging tower defense core (weight 0.08): The tower defense gameplay is described as strongly engaging, well-made, and addictive. Fans of the genre consider it a solid and entertaining entry.
- Strong and unique concept (weight 0.06): The game concept is described as amazing, cool, and an excellent idea. Reviewers find the premise compelling and refreshing.
- Variety of towers and heroes (weight 0.05): The large selection of towers, heroes, and upgrades enables unique strategies. Players enjoy experimenting with many combinations.
- Appealing vibrant visuals (weight 0.05): Reviewers praise the colorful, chaotic, and visually satisfying presentation. The graphics are described as great and vibrant.
- Fun for Bloons fans (weight 0.05): Longtime Bloons fans find it a great experience and very fun. The silly monkey-shooting-bloons theme resonates with the audience.
- Good audio quality (weight 0.05): The audio is rated as good or very good by several reviewers. Sound design contributes positively to the experience.
- A favorite tower defense title (weight 0.05): Some reviewers rank it among their favorite tower defense games or their favorite Bloons TD entry. Strong loyalty among genre fans is evident.

Common complaints:
- Excessive grinding for unlocks (weight 0.27): Unlocking heroes, towers, and upgrades requires extremely long grinds or real-money purchases. Progression is consistently described as slow and punishing.
- Pay-to-win monetization (weight 0.23): Players widely describe the game as pay-to-win, with pervasive microtransactions and a free-to-play label that does not hold up in practice. Many feel payment is effectively required to progress.
- Poor game balancing (weight 0.17): The game is repeatedly called unbalanced, with serious balance problems reported at launch and continuing. Matchups can feel unfair, especially against more experienced opponents.
- Broken performance and crashing (weight 0.14): The game frequently fails to launch, runs very laggy, and is described as badly engineered and extremely broken. Lag can make matches nearly unplayable.
- Connection and sync issues (weight 0.14): Players experience frequent disconnects, reconnecting or syncing problems, and connection error messages even with good internet. These issues often cost matches.
- Long matchmaking wait times (weight 0.12): Matchmaking can take an unreasonably long time and sometimes fails to find opponents, making the game feel dead. Some players also report being matched against far stronger opponents.
- Game becomes boring quickly (weight 0.09): Players report the game gets boring fast, partly due to a lack of players and poor handling. The experience loses enjoyment after a while.
- Slow in-game currency earnings (weight 0.07): Monkey Money is hard to earn because wins pay little and losses pay nothing, making heroes and tower upgrades costly to obtain without spending money.
- Lack of tutorials and guidance (weight 0.07): There is no real tutorial, and the game is confusing about where to go or what to do. Some players got stuck without knowing how to proceed.
- No longer receiving updates (weight 0.06): Ninja Kiwi reportedly does not update the game anymore. No new hero or alternate has been released in over a year.
- Limited weekly ranking progression (weight 0.04): Ranking up is limited to roughly once a week and is based on weekly playtime rather than wins. This slows competitive progression and frustrates players.
- Too many sweaty players (weight 0.04): The game is full of highly competitive, sweaty players, which can make matches feel oppressive for casual players.
- Insufficient tower variety (weight 0.04): Players feel the number of towers they can bring is too small and that there are not enough towers overall, limiting strategic options.
- No story content (weight 0.04): Reviewers note that the game has no story at all, which reduces engagement for players expecting narrative content.
- Poor graphics compared to BTD6 (weight 0.04): The game is described as a nerfed version of BTD6, with graphics that are poor by comparison. This makes it feel like a downgrade.
- Inconsistent difficulty (weight 0.03): Some players find the game too difficult while others find it too easy, indicating inconsistent difficulty tuning.

Gameplay feedback:
- 1v1 tower defense format (weight 0.32): Matches are structured as one-on-one tower defense wars where each player builds defenses and sends bloons at the opponent. Players must survive longer than their rival.
- Core tower defense gameplay (weight 0.31): Players place monkey towers and pop balloons in a classic tower defense format. This is the foundational identity of the game and is consistently described across reviews.
- Competitive PvP battles (weight 0.24): The game is fundamentally a player-versus-player experience where players battle other humans in real-time matches. Competitive play is a central and frequently cited feature.
- Progression and upgrade system (weight 0.23): There is an out-of-game progression system where experience and currency unlock new content and upgrades. Progression is frequently mentioned as a core loop that keeps players engaged.
- Unlockable monkeys and heroes (weight 0.21): Monkeys and heroes are unlocked through progression and currency, and each monkey has its own upgrade tree up to level 5. This ties progression directly to gameplay variety.
- Multiplayer with friends (weight 0.21): The game supports playing together with friends and family, including playing against friends or teaming up against random opponents. Multiplayer is a well-liked social feature.
- Ranked mode and leaderboards (weight 0.15): The game features a ranked progression system where players climb tiers and Elo through ranked matches. Leaderboards and ranks add a competitive ladder for dedicated players.
- Send bloons at opponent (weight 0.15): A signature mechanic lets players send bloons toward their opponent during matches, either individually or in batches. Sending powerful bloons such as BAD and UBER BAD is a key strategic tool.
- Matchmaking system (weight 0.14): Online matchmaking pairs players in queues, with skill-based matching against competitive opponents. Matchmaking is the standard way to find matches and is widely recognized.
- Tower tiers and loadouts (weight 0.12): Towers have multiple tiers including fifth-tier upgrades, and players build loadouts mixing choices like dartling, farm, and ice. Tower variety and loadout building add strategic depth.
- Special bloons and camo (weight 0.11): Players can send camo bloons, DDTs, purple balloons, and other powerful bloons to overwhelm opponents. These specialized bloons add a layer of tactical decision-making.

Performance notes:
- Severe lag and connection failures (weight 0.28): Players report persistent lag, connection drops, and server issues that make matches unplayable and can cause forced losses or disconnects even with stable internet.
- Game crashes and freezes (weight 0.12): The game frequently crashes during gameplay or mid-match, and sometimes freezes requiring a restart. These crashes persist without improvement and can occur even on high-end systems.
- Runs well on low-end hardware (weight 0.12): Many players report the game runs smoothly on old laptops, low-end systems, and low-end phones like the Galaxy A20e, with good optimization and stable FPS.
- Syncing and desync problems (weight 0.11): Syncing issues cause repeated freezes, long waiting periods, and unplayable matches. Desyncs and unresolved syncing loops can cost players matches.
- Late-game lag with many towers (weight 0.07): Severe lag occurs in later rounds or when many towers are placed or powerful Bloons are sent, making the game run like a slideshow and sometimes causing forced disconnects.
- Game fails to launch (weight 0.05): The game often fails to launch or start on Windows 11, requiring repeated restarts. Some players also experience launch focus issues.
- Mobile optimization issues (weight 0.05): The mobile version suffers from optimization issues, lag, and connection problems, and needs better optimization for phones.
- Controls and input glitches (weight 0.05): Controls sometimes do not respond when buttons are pressed, and key input glitches occur. Alt+F4 can also make the game unresponsive.
- Freezes with synchronization error (weight 0.04): The game freezes during play with a synchronization error despite a working internet connection, forcing restarts.
- Poor connection delays upgrades (weight 0.02): Poor connection causes delayed tower upgrades and almost uncontrollable monkeys, impacting gameplay significantly.
- Lag issues since launch unfixed (weight 0.02): Lag issues present since launch remain unfixed, according to some players.
- Menu stutters when switching tabs (weight 0.02): The menu stutters when switching between tabs, affecting navigation smoothness.
- Display issue after closing (weight 0.02): Closing the game window can leave the display with a blue hue and very dark until the system is restarted.
- Server quality improved over time (weight 0.02): Some players note that server quality was poor but has now improved, indicating positive changes.

Recommendations:
- Avoid or not recommended (weight 0.19): A number of reviewers strongly advise against playing or downloading the game, citing various issues.
- General positive recommendations (weight 0.19): Many reviewers simply give a strong positive recommendation for the game, calling it great and worth trying.
- Play BTD6 instead (weight 0.18): Many reviewers recommend playing Bloons TD 6 as a superior alternative, with some suggesting it as the first choice and this game only for those who cannot afford BTD6.
- Recommendation for tower defense fans (weight 0.15): The game is frequently recommended to players who enjoy tower defense games, including fans of strategy and online multiplayer.
- Good for Bloons franchise fans (weight 0.12): Reviewers recommend it especially to those who already enjoy Bloons games or have played other titles in the series.
- Competitive PvP focus (weight 0.12): The game is recommended for players who enjoy competitive PvP tower defense, including those who like climbing leagues and battling others.
- Free-to-play friendly (weight 0.12): Several reviewers recommend it to free-to-play players or those who cannot afford paid games, though some warn about grinding or microtransactions.
- Microtransaction and monetization concerns (weight 0.09): Some reviewers caution against spending money on microtransactions, though a few find the Club Membership worthwhile for dedicated players.
- Casual and quick sessions (weight 0.09): The game is recommended for casual play, quick sessions, or when bored, but not for long-term serious investment.
- Better than BTD6 or Battles 1 (weight 0.09): A few reviewers consider this game better than Bloons TD 6 or the original Battles, recommending it over those titles.
- Not for beginners (weight 0.08): Multiple reviewers warn that the game is not ideal for completely new players or beginners, who may struggle or need to know strategies from other titles.
- Play with friends (weight 0.08): Reviewers suggest playing against friends or in private sessions with friends for the best experience.
- Suitable for all ages (weight 0.07): Some reviewers note the game is suitable for children, teenagers, and adults, though a few disagree about older players.
- Strategy and synergy focus (weight 0.06): The game is recommended for players who enjoy strategy, tactical duels, and figuring out complex synergies.
- Grind or pay to enjoy (weight 0.05): Some reviewers indicate that enjoyment requires either grinding or spending money, and not recommended for those unwilling to grind.
- Bugged game and connection issues (weight 0.05): Some reviewers report bugs, glitches, and syncing/connection problems, and withhold recommendation until fixed.
- Emote taunting and competition (weight 0.03): A few reviewers mention emote taunting as a positive or negative factor, and recommend the game for competitive players who enjoy gloating.
- Not for serious shooter fans (weight 0.03): A few reviewers note the game is not for those seeking a serious shooter or realistic graphics, but it is recommended for shooting game fans.
- Quincy avoidance advice (weight 0.02): One reviewer advises avoiding the character Quincy to make the game somewhat playable.
- Wired connection recommended (weight 0.02): One reviewer recommends using a wired Ethernet connection for better online play.

Other player notes:
- Frequently compared to Bloons TD 6 (weight 0.34): The most common comparison is to Bloons TD 6, with many reviewers considering BTD6 the better or more complete game. Others see this title as a faster-paced multiplayer alternative or a next-best option for players who do not own BTD6.
- Free-to-play with paid microtransactions (weight 0.24): The game is widely described as free to play but monetized through microtransactions, including a purchasable Club Membership that unlocks extra tools. Some players feel the free label is misleading because spending is effectively required to progress.
- Available on PC and mobile (weight 0.16): Reviewers note the game is available for free on PC and can also be played on smartphones. This cross-platform availability is mentioned as a practical advantage.
- Captures classic Bloons TD feel (weight 0.16): Many reviewers say the game preserves the classic Bloons TD experience and compares favorably to earlier entries. It is often recommended to fans of the series as a familiar but fresh take.
- Large amount of content (weight 0.16): The game is said to offer hundreds of hours of content and regular free updates. Reviewers cite this volume of content as a reason to keep playing.
- PvP-focused reuse of BTD6 content (weight 0.12): The game shares towers and heroes with BTD6 but centers entirely on PvP, with the PvP system barely changed from the original. It is seen as a competitive counterpart rather than a full single-player tower defense experience.
- Sequel improving on prior titles (weight 0.09): The game is described as a sequel by the team behind the previous title and as an updated, improved version of it. Reviewers who played the earlier entries see meaningful improvements over Battles 1.
- Free compared to paid BTD6 (weight 0.09): Reviewers highlight that this game is free to play, unlike the paid Bloons TD 6. It is often framed as a free alternative for players who cannot or do not want to buy BTD6.
- Favorable comparison to BTD6 or BTD (weight 0.07): A minority of reviewers compare the game favorably to BTD6 or the classic BTD titles. They see it as a worthwhile entry in the series despite the dominant preference for BTD6.

Emotions:
- Frustration (weight 0.23): Players are frustrated by severe connection problems, including constant disconnects, sync errors, and matchmaking failures that force surrenders or count as losses. They also resent the heavy grind and pay-to-win progression, unfair matchmaking against much stronger opponents, and poor game balance that forces narrow strategies. Bugs and crashes, plus a lack of tutorial for new players, compound the annoyance.
- Enjoyment (weight 0.12): Players enjoy the fun, addictive tower defense gameplay with strategic depth, variety of towers and heroes, and satisfying progression. The competitive PvP matches, frequent updates, and ability to play with friends are major sources of enjoyment. Many appreciate the simple, easy-to-learn mechanics and the rewarding feeling of unlocking upgrades.
- Disappointment (weight 0.09): Players are disappointed by the game's heavy monetization, pay-to-win mechanics, and the feeling that it is a downgrade from the original. Poor balancing, lack of updates, and matchmaking issues that make matches feel unfair contribute to this sentiment. Many feel the game had potential but was undermined by anti-consumer practices and neglect.
- Annoyance (weight 0.05): Annoyance stems from aggressive microtransactions, sweaty players, and toxic community behavior. Connection issues, grinding requirements, and unfair matchmaking also irritate players. Small quality-of-life problems like missing menus or loud audio add to the irritation.
- Satisfaction (weight 0.04): Players feel satisfied by outplaying opponents, strategizing effectively, and seeing their skills improve over time. The game's balanced difficulty, rewarding progression, and strategic depth provide a sense of accomplishment. Fixes to balance and optimization also contribute to satisfaction.
- Excitement (weight 0.03): Excitement comes from intense, fast-paced PvP battles and the thrill of sending powerful bloons like DDTs. The competitive nature, strategic complexity, and unpredictable matches keep players engaged. Winning and celebrating with friends amplifies the excitement.
- Anger (weight 0.03): Anger is driven by greedy monetization, pay-to-win mechanics, and feeling cheated by bans or unfair gameplay. Technical issues like crashes, lag, and unresponsive controls during critical moments also provoke anger. The perception that the game is intentionally designed to frustrate players into paying is a major source.
- Boredom (weight 0.03): Boredom arises from repetitive gameplay, grindy progression, and a stale meta with limited viable strategies. Playing against bots or without friends makes the experience feel dull. The lack of new content and variety leads to a sense of monotony.
- Fun (weight 0.03): Players have fun with the game's engaging multiplayer battles, strategic learning, and progression systems. The fast-paced rounds, variety of towers, and ability to play in short sessions make it enjoyable. Playing with friends and unlocking new content adds to the fun.
- Amusement (weight 0.03): Amusement comes from the game's goofy humor, silly monkeys, and chaotic balloon-popping action. Quirky moments like defeating noobs or being rushed early provide lighthearted entertainment. The contrast between cute visuals and strategic complexity is also amusing.
- Dissatisfaction (weight 0.02): Dissatisfaction is caused by pervasive bugs, unbalanced gameplay, and pay-to-win elements that give paying players an advantage. Matchmaking that feels unfair and a low starting economy leading to early losses contribute. The game often feels like a worse version of its predecessor.
- Love (weight 0.02): Players love the game for its cute tower defense concept, competitive battles, and long-term enjoyment despite flaws. The strategic depth, charm, and nostalgia for the Bloons series foster strong affection. Many express love for the game even while acknowledging its balance issues.
- Enthusiasm (weight 0.02): Enthusiasm is fueled by the game being incredibly fun, replayable, and a spectacular improvement over the original. Players appreciate the 3D models, free-to-play model without ads, and the blend of BTD6 spirit with new mechanics. Playing for many hours and sharing with friends reflects high enthusiasm.
- Appreciation (weight 0.02): Players appreciate the game's strategic depth, character designs, and the variety of strategies available for free. The developers' efforts to fix issues after a rough launch and the addition of minigames are valued. The game offers good value for players without money.
- Addiction (weight 0.02): Addiction is driven by tactical duels, complex synergies, and the escalating challenge of competitive matches. The game's fun gameplay and constant adaptation keep players engaged for long periods. Many describe playing constantly and finding it hard to stop.
- Admiration (weight 0.02): Players admire the game's 1v1 battle format, high-quality music, and incredible concept. The balance across many towers and the strategic competition are highly praised. For some, it has become their favorite tower defense game, surpassing BTD6.
- Disgust (weight 0.01): Disgust is felt toward the game's pay-to-win system, expensive cosmetics, and paywalled features like sandbox mode. The perception of the game as a cartel war simulator or a pay-to-win swamp evokes strong negative reactions. Charging money for basic gameplay elements is seen as exploitative.
- Confusion (weight 0.01): Confusion arises from a lack of tutorial and unclear guidance on basic concepts like the eco system. Players struggle to understand why the game fails to work despite a good internet connection. Getting stuck without knowing what to do next is a common experience.
- Sadness (weight 0.01): Sadness comes from seeing a childhood favorite decline and a great game being ruined by sneaky monetization. Players feel sorrow that the game hasn't reached a wider audience and that enjoyment is overshadowed by unanswered questions about improvement. The wasted potential is a source of melancholy.}