Info about Roguebook:

Official game description:
Digital Deluxe Edition
======================
About the Game
==============
The ancients speak of a Book written since time immemorial containing all the world's legends. After many fabulous adventures, recounted in _Faeria – Chronicles of Gagana_, this relic was lost in a well of Faeria. Through contact with this source of magic, the Book developed a wicked free will of its own and became the Roguebook!
You are trapped in the Book of Lore of _Faeria_, and each page represents a new challenge. Lead your two heroes to victory in this roguelike deckbuilder developed in partnership with Richard Garfield, creator of _Magic: The Gathering_™. Put together the best synergies between cards, relics and abilities, and take on the Roguebook.
**LEGENDARY HEROES**
--------------------
*   **6 hero pairs** – Choose 2 heroes to start a game. Each hero has a collection of over 50 cards, a personal relic and a unique skill tree.  
*   **Maximise synergies** – The hero at the front protects the hero at the back. Switch the positions of your heroes and combine their strengths to unleash powerful combos.  
*   **Strategic battles** – Skilfully anticipate and queue up your actions to defeat over 40 bosses and enemies.
**BUILD YOUR DECK AS YOU PLAY**
-------------------------------
*   **Dynamic deckbuilding** – Over 200 cards to cleverly assemble as the game progresses. You will never play with the same deck twice.  
*   **Relics with unique powers** – Upgrade your cards with 30 special gems. Collect 80 relics with extraordinary effects.  
*   **More cards, more power!** – Each hero has a unique skill tree to unlock. Collect cards and select the best skills!
**EXPLORE A WORLD THAT CHANGES WITH EACH NEW BRUSHSTROKE**
----------------------------------------------------------
*   **The Book changes each time you open it** – The map along with its mysteries and dangers are procedurally generated for a brand-new challenge every time.  
*   **Paint the world** – The Roguebook's pages are composed of hexagonal tiles. Use magic inks that reveal different patterns to fully explore each page.  
*   **A range of encounters** – Merchants, travellers, ruins, quests, etc. Lots of chances to obtain cards and relics… or to fall into a trap!
**EACH RUN COUNTS IN THE QUEST TO DEFEAT THE ROGUEBOOK**
--------------------------------------------------------
*   **Hours and hours of fun** – 20 hours on average to beat the game, hundreds of hours to unlock everything.  
*   **Progress at your own pace** – Collect pages and use them to buy upgrades. Level up your heroes to unlock new cards.  
*   **20 difficulty levels** – Defeat the final boss to unlock the Epilogue level. Each level grants access to new relics, gems and encounters, but also spawns tougher enemies.

Release date: Jun 17, 2021

Categories: Roguelike Deckbuilder, Deckbuilder, Roguelite, Turn-based Combat, Card-based Gameplay, Map Exploration, Character Progression, Meta-Progression

Feature scans:
- MTX: score 20; verdict: Fair with Launch DLC Caveat; summary: The audit found no evidence of gacha, loot boxes, paid currency, battle passes, or a real-money shop. The main real-money concern is a controversial day-one paid DLC with non-cosmetic content, plus later paid DLC characters and achievement paywalls. Reviews also show that the launch DLC was later integrated into the base game for free, and in-game currency is earned through play. Under the DLC and evidence-threshold rules, the score is capped at 20.
- Wiki: score 50; verdict: Tier 3 - The Student; summary: The primary Wiki Tax driver is instructional and reference dependency: users lack an in-game Bestiary/Encyclopedia and struggle to understand viable burst deck builds, pushing them toward guides or wikis. A separate high-severity crash and save-data loss issue appears, but it is Tier 4 under the scoring hierarchy. No explicit farming, drop-rate, loot-table, inventory, selling, blueprint, or crafting-requirement language appears, so Tier 1 and Tier 2 are not triggered. Strict priority therefore yields Tier 3.
- Proton/Linux: score 55; verdict: Tinkering Required / Mixed; summary: Linux and Proton compatibility is mixed. Positive reports include native Linux support and smooth gameplay, but other users report launch failures after Proton version switching, Proton-related crashes, poor performance on Linux-capable hardware, and at least one unplayable Linux experience. The game appears playable for part of the Linux audience, but often with Proton tinkering and inconsistent stability.
- Steam Deck: score 80; verdict: Broken for Many Steam Deck Users; summary: The Steam Deck experience is mixed but carries high friction. Deck-specific evidence shows small, unreadable card and shop text, and several users report crashes, launch failures after Proton changes, and save loss. Some users report smooth long sessions, but under the rubric unreadable UI and stability or launch failures place the title in the broken tier.

- Hardware Profile:
  - Summary: Across the provided Windows hardware cohorts, performance is mostly positive, with higher-VRAM systems described as easy to run and only rare crashes; one cohort has a report of noticeable stutter during card resolution when many gems are present.
  - Sample size: 36 (1% coverage)
  - Audience skew: Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
  - Windows <8GB VRAM (positive, 12 reports): The included 6 GB VRAM reviews recommend the game and do not report performance problems.
  - Windows 8-11GB VRAM (negative, 8 reports): The included non-recommended review reports noticeable stutter during card resolution when many gems are present.
  - Windows 12-15GB VRAM (positive, 7 reports): The included reviews say the game is easy to run, with only a rare crash after alt-tabbing or long sessions.
  - Windows 16GB+ VRAM (positive, 5 reports): The included review recommends the game and reports no performance problems.
  - Caveats: 36 of 4638 reviews expose hardware metadata.; Review sample is mostly Windows-based.
Feature extractions:
- Community Price:
  - Community fair range: $10.00 - $20.00
  - Reasoning: Reviews repeatedly reject the $25-$35 full-price ask as too high for the amount of content, while naming sale thresholds around $10-$15 and treating under $20 as an acceptable ceiling. A few players accept about $20 at launch, but the dominant community view is that the base game is fair only when discounted into the $10-$20 range.
- Playtime Metrics:
  - Game completion: 10.0h
  - Story completion: N/A
  - Session length: 1.0h
  - Endgame: 60.0h
  - Reasoning: First-completion reports place beating the final boss or getting a first win at around 7 to 10 hours, so gameCompletion is estimated at about 10 hours. A run is described as lasting about 1 hour, supporting sessionLength of 1 hour. The clearest high-difficulty/endgame marker is an epilogue 15 clear at 60.1 hours, so endgame is set to 60 hours. No separate story-completion playtime is reported, so storyCompletion is null.
- Time-to-fun:
  - Summary: Players frequently describe Roguebook as addictive almost immediately, especially once a fun deck comes together, but many report that repetition sets in after about 10 runs. Early meta-progression grind and tutorial difficulty create a secondary 'opens up later' experience for some.
  - Stance: Fun then drops
  - Anchor: Within the first five minutes of gameplay
  - Time to anchor: 0h 5m
  - Friction: Early meta-progression grind and locked basic features; Tutorial or starting run harder than later runs; Weak initial progression and punishing early enemies; RNG-heavy map exploration and slow tile reveal; Repetitive map discovery after a few runs; Balance variability and limited content variety
  - Unlock drivers: Permanent meta-progression upgrades such as pages, artifacts, and talents; Gem system for card customization and synergy; Unlocking a wider variety of cards and tools; Learning which skills and cards to prioritize; New characters and deck archetypes; The game opening up later with more options
  - Conditions: If you like Slay the Spire-style deckbuilders; Tolerance for meta-progression grinding; Getting a strong card or gem combo; Playing beyond the early tutorial or starting run; Unlocking enough permanent upgrades; Favorable RNG during map exploration; Tolerance for repetition after several runs; Not expecting a large content variety
- Player Archetypes:
  - Deckbuilder Genre Veteran Seeking a Fresh Twist (buy)
    - Motivation: To find a novel variation on the familiar roguelike deckbuilding loop, especially through dual-hero positioning and map exploration.
    - Playstyle: Builds and optimizes two-hero decks, experiments with card and gem synergies, and judges systems against Slay the Spire and Monster Train.
    - Experience: veteran
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: fan of the genre
    - Reference games: Slay the Spire; Monster Train
  - Casual Evening Run Player (buy)
    - Motivation: Relaxing, low-pressure card runs that fit into a short evening session.
    - Playstyle: Plays one or a few runs per session, favors forgiving difficulty and discovery over hardcore optimization.
    - Experience: familiar
    - Purchase stance: buy
    - Labels: casual; casual player
    - Reference games: Slay the Spire; Pirates Outlaws
  - Grind-Weary Completionist (no buy)
    - Motivation: To complete achievements, max meta-progression, and unlock every embellishment.
    - Playstyle: Repeats many runs to farm unlocks and achievements, tracks completion criteria closely, and tolerates grind but resents artificial barriers.
    - Experience: veteran
    - Purchase stance: no buy
    - Labels: achievement hunter
    - Reference games: N/A
  - Hardcore Slay the Spire Purist (no buy)
    - Motivation: To play the most refined, challenging, and competitive deckbuilder rather than an imitator.
    - Playstyle: Expects tight balance, high-level challenge, and meaningful competition; rejects grinding or design that feels inferior to Slay the Spire.
    - Experience: veteran
    - Purchase stance: no buy
    - Labels: N/A
    - Reference games: Slay the Spire


Below are summaries of things people say about the game per category.
Each point is assigned a weight that represents how often it is mentioned across all reviews.
What players like:
- Excellent roguelike deckbuilder (weight 0.38): The game is widely praised as a very good to excellent roguelike deckbuilder, often considered one of the best in the genre. Many reviewers call it their favorite or a standout title among deckbuilder roguelites.
- Compared favorably to Slay the Spire (weight 0.3): Many reviewers compare the game to Slay the Spire, noting it offers more exploration, variety, replayability, and a less punishing experience. Some even consider it better or a worthy successor.
- Interesting deckbuilding mechanics (weight 0.27): The deckbuilding system is praised for its depth, variety, and intricate synergies. Managing two characters and building synergistic decks is addictive and offers many viable strategies.
- Fun and addictive gameplay (weight 0.21): Players find the game very fun, addictive, and enjoyable to spend time on. The gameplay is described as pleasant, relaxing, and highly entertaining.
- Diverse heroes and combinations (weight 0.21): The game features multiple distinct heroes with unique cards and relics, allowing for varied team combinations and playstyles. Pairing two heroes creates many strategic possibilities and keeps runs fresh.
- Solid overall experience (weight 0.2): Reviewers consistently rate the game as good or excellent overall, with many feeling satisfied and finding it enjoyable so far. It is considered a solid and well-rounded experience.
- Beautiful graphics and sound (weight 0.19): The visuals, art style, animations, and music are frequently praised as gorgeous, polished, and stylish. The sound design and graphical presentation are highlighted as strong points.
- Unique ink-based map exploration (weight 0.18): The map exploration mechanic using different types of ink is a fresh and strategic addition. Players enjoy the tactical risk-reward of balancing ink types to reveal paths and survive longer.
- Engaging card battle system (weight 0.09): The card battler gameplay is super fun and provides many hours of entertainment. Battles are not overly difficult and are enjoyed by fans of card games.
- Gem system upgrades cards (weight 0.08): Cards can be upgraded using gems with varying properties, adding a fresh layer of customization. This gem-based upgrade system is well-received for enhancing card synergies.

Common complaints:
- Unpolished and unbalanced (weight 0.2): The game lacks polish compared to genre peers, with balance issues and an unfinished feel.
- Repetitive gameplay (weight 0.11): The game becomes repetitive quickly due to repeated cards and monsters across runs and limited content variety.
- Slow animations and pacing (weight 0.09): Gameplay is slowed by unskippable animations, and map movement further slows the pace.
- DLC adds little content (weight 0.09): The DLC only adds one character without new levels or mechanics, and a fourth character is locked behind it.
- Weak card synergy (weight 0.07): Card synergy is weak and card variety is limited, making it hard to build powerful combos.
- Persistent bugs (weight 0.06): The game remains buggy, with many players encountering issues that affect the experience.
- Abandoned by developer (weight 0.06): The developer has dropped support, with no updates for over a year, leaving the game feeling abandoned.
- Insufficient card removal (weight 0.06): Players lack reliable ways to remove cards from their deck during a level, hindering deck optimization.
- Too few levels (weight 0.06): Only three levels exist, which players find insufficient for long-term engagement.
- Heavy meta-progression grind (weight 0.06): The game requires extensive meta-progression, making it very difficult to win without significant grinding.
- Lackluster story (weight 0.05): The story is almost nonexistent, with no real narrative beyond the introduction.
- Lag when playing cards (weight 0.05): A known lag issue causes delays of 10+ seconds between playing each card, frustrating players.
- Low difficulty (weight 0.05): The game is considered a bit easy on lower ranks, lacking challenge for some players.

Gameplay feedback:
- Roguelike deckbuilder core (weight 0.79): The game is overwhelmingly described as a roguelike deckbuilder with turn-based card combat and run-based progression. Many reviews note it follows the genre template while adding its own twists.
- Map exploration via ink (weight 0.41): The overworld map is explored by using brushes and ink to reveal tiles, uncovering treasures, enemies, and paths. This ink-based tile reveal is a distinctive feature highlighted by many reviewers.
- Two-hero team gameplay (weight 0.39): Players control two heroes simultaneously, often choosing two from a roster of four (or five with DLC). Their separate decks are combined into one shared deck for each run.
- Gem-based card upgrades (weight 0.28): Cards can be upgraded by socketing gems, which add various effects and properties. Cards have rarity levels and gem slots, allowing for deep customization.
- Card synergy and combos (weight 0.19): The card system emphasizes building synergies between cards, heroes, and relics. Players create combos and deck strategies around these interactions.
- Distinct hero card pools (weight 0.16): Each hero has their own unique cards, relics, and playstyle. This encourages experimenting with different hero combinations and deck builds.
- Unlockable characters and content (weight 0.15): The game features unlockable characters, cards, gems, and other content through progression. Achievements and repeated runs unlock additional challenges and epilogue content.
- Character leveling and talents (weight 0.08): Heroes can be leveled up, gaining talent upgrades and ascension levels. This provides a sense of progression across runs.
- Four base heroes plus DLC (weight 0.08): The base game includes four playable heroes, with a fifth available via DLC. Players choose two of these for each run.

Performance notes:
- Frequent crashes reported (weight 0.12): Many players experience crashes often, with some reporting crashes every one in three runs or more than 100 times.
- Lag causes long card delays (weight 0.1): Players experience 10-30 second waits between playing cards or resolving turn actions, making gameplay feel slow.
- Crashes corrupt save files (weight 0.07): Crashes can corrupt save files, leading to permanent loss of save data in some cases.
- Optimization causes low FPS (weight 0.07): Poor optimization leads to frame drops, stuttering, and high CPU temperatures even on high-end systems.
- Steam Deck performance issues (weight 0.07): On Steam Deck, players report crashes, long loading times, unreadable text, and erratic joystick input.
- Combat entry triggers crashes (weight 0.06): Attempting to enter combat causes the game to crash.
- Laggy effect resolution (weight 0.06): Resolving certain card effects feels laggy, and some cards cause optimization issues.
- Switch performance slow (weight 0.04): Slow performance and long loading times are reported on Nintendo Switch.
- No option to speed animations (weight 0.04): There is no way to reduce or speed up detailed animations, which contributes to slow gameplay.
- Speed glitch halves gameplay (weight 0.04): A glitch halves gameplay speed, and frequent bugs make the game unplayable.
- Tournament server connection fails (weight 0.04): Unable to connect to the tournament server, and performance issues occur during tournaments with large decks.
- Long loading screens (weight 0.04): Long loading screens occur, partly due to detailed graphics.
- Crashes after 4.5 update (weight 0.04): Crashes occur after the 4.5 update, and the game stopped launching entirely after an update.
- Game feels untested and buggy (weight 0.04): The game feels untested and in an alpha state, with numerous bugs present.
- Freezes before combat (weight 0.03): Occasional sudden freezes and little freezes occur before combat.
- Crashes more than 100 times (weight 0.03): One player reported over 100 crashes, and another experienced no crashes after 15 ascensions.
- Game fails to recognize game-over (weight 0.02): The game fails to recognize game-over when both characters are dead.
- NullReferenceException crash (weight 0.02): The game crashes with a NullReferenceException error.
- Runs smoothly on Linux Proton (weight 0.02): The game runs smoothly on Linux using Proton version 9.0.4 instead of the default Scout.

Recommendations:
- Slay the Spire comparison (weight 0.42): Most reviewers compare the game to Slay the Spire and recommend it to fans of that game. It is often described as a worthy successor or similar experience.
- General positive recommendation (weight 0.33): Many reviews simply recommend the game without specific caveats. Phrases like 'highly recommended' and 'thumbs up' are common.
- Deckbuilder genre appeal (weight 0.31): The game is highly recommended for fans of deckbuilding games in general. Many reviewers say it satisfies the itch for another deckbuilder.
- Buy on sale (weight 0.29): A common recommendation is to wait for a sale or discount before purchasing. Many consider it worth the price only when discounted.
- Roguelite deckbuilder fans (weight 0.2): Reviewers frequently recommend the game to fans of roguelite deckbuilders. It is praised as a must-play for that niche.
- Not for experienced players (weight 0.12): A few reviewers warn that experienced players of similar games may not enjoy it. It is more recommended for newcomers to the genre.
- Worth full price (weight 0.11): Some reviewers consider the game worth buying at full price due to its quality. They do not regret paying full price.
- CCG and card game fans (weight 0.08): The game is recommended for fans of collectible card games and card combination games. Skills from games like Magic: The Gathering may transfer.
- Genre fans easy recommendation (weight 0.08): For fans of the genre, the game is an easy recommendation according to some reviewers.
- Negative recommendation (weight 0.06): A small number of reviewers explicitly do not recommend buying the game, even at a deep discount.
- Patience for first runs (weight 0.04): Reviewers advise being patient with the first few runs and not judging the game solely on the initial experience.
- DLC worth getting (weight 0.04): The DLC is considered worth the purchase, even at launch price, according to some reviewers.
- Not at full price (weight 0.04): Some reviewers recommend against buying at full price, suggesting waiting for a discount.

Other player notes:
- Compared to Monster Train and Slay the Spire (weight 0.29): Reviewers frequently mention Monster Train alongside Slay the Spire as similar games, noting that this game scratches a similar itch with its own unique mechanics.
- Paid DLC adds new character (weight 0.24): The game has a paid DLC that unlocks an additional character (a fifth hero), and some achievements require the DLC.
- Less polished and easier than Slay the Spire (weight 0.24): Many reviewers feel the game is less polished and balanced than Slay the Spire, and also easier, especially on the first completed run. However, some still find it decent and accessible.
- Some prefer it over Slay the Spire (weight 0.2): A number of reviewers consider this game better than or equal to Slay the Spire, praising its pacing, game feel, and overall enjoyment.
- Developed by Richard Garfield and Abrakam (weight 0.15): The game is developed by Abrakam (creators of Faeria) in collaboration with Richard Garfield, the creator of Magic: The Gathering.
- Set in the Faeria universe (weight 0.1): The game shares the same universe and art style as Faeria, reusing characters and artwork.
- Adds exploration and meta progression (weight 0.09): Compared to Slay the Spire, this game introduces more exploration and unknown elements, as well as meta progression and team mechanics.
- Praised for art style and smoothness (weight 0.09): Some reviewers highlight the game's art style as prettier than Slay the Spire and note smooth card play, ranking it among the best in the genre.
- Runs last about 1.5 to 2.5 hours (weight 0.06): Reviewers mention that a single run can take approximately one and a half to two and a half hours to complete.
- Close in fun but not quite top tier (weight 0.05): Some reviewers find it nearly as fun as Slay the Spire but not on the same level overall, though still addictive and favorable compared to others in the genre.
- DLC pricing considered high (weight 0.05): Some reviewers feel the DLC is overpriced, with the character costing about half the price of the base game or even more.
- Compared to other roguelike deckbuilders (weight 0.05): The game is also compared to titles like Dicey Dungeons, Castle Morihisa, Banners of Ruin, Across the Obelisk, Gordian Quest, Inscryption, and Vault of the Void.

Emotions:
- Frustration (weight 0.17): Players frequently cite severe RNG dependence, where bad draws, empty map tiles, or missing key cards can doom runs that took hours to build. Numerous bugs, crashes, and save-file corruption wipe out progress with no developer response. Balance issues make enemies deal absurd damage while healing and card removal are scarce, creating a punishing and often unfair experience.
- Disappointment (weight 0.15): Many reviewers find the game too short, with only three worlds, limited enemy variety, and shallow replayability. Bugs, crashes, and a lack of post-launch support make the game feel unfinished, while the meta-progression and deckbuilding lack depth compared to genre peers. The absence of a real story ending and the prevalence of filler cards further dampen enthusiasm.
- Enjoyment (weight 0.11): Players appreciate the unique two-hero deckbuilding and map exploration, finding the core combat loop and synergy building highly engaging. The charming art, fairy-tale atmosphere, and steady unlock progression contribute to a fun and satisfying roguelike experience. Despite flaws, many keep returning for the tactical depth and satisfying combos.
- Satisfaction (weight 0.09): Satisfaction stems from developing powerful combos, unlocking persistent upgrades, and overcoming the initial difficulty curve. The dual-character deck fusion and meaningful progression create a rewarding sense of mastery. Beating challenges after struggling reinforces the feeling that success is earned and fair.
- Enthusiasm (weight 0.04): Enthusiastic players highlight the innovative map exploration, the synergy between two heroes, and the enormous replayability of combining characters, cards, and gems. The fresh take on familiar deckbuilder mechanics, along with the artistic presentation, generates significant excitement. They eagerly anticipate more content and continue to discover new strategies.
- Appreciation (weight 0.04): Reviewers appreciate the strategic depth that emerges at higher difficulties, the well-executed map and hero-swap mechanics, and the beautiful aesthetic. The game offers a fresh and polished take on the deckbuilder genre, with thoughtful design and atmospheric presentation. They value the creative systems and the overall experience.
- Annoyance (weight 0.04): Annoyance arises from grinding achievements, slow meta-progression, and excessively long chapters. The paid DLC locking a character, frequent crashes, and RNG that strands players on the map without recourse add to the irritation. Clunky UI elements and the manipulative review prompt also contribute.
- Excitement (weight 0.03): Excitement is driven by the discovery of new mechanics, the thrill of revealing map tiles, and the anticipation of each run. Players are captivated by the charismatic characters, the fusion of liked games, and the endless potential for killer combos. The sense of adventure and rewarding progression keeps them eager to play more.
- Addiction (weight 0.03): The addictive quality comes from the engaging loop of gathering resources, leveling up, and unlocking new cards, which makes it hard to stop playing. The constant progression and the feeling of becoming more powerful with each run create a compelling one-more-turn experience. Character combinations and talent tree improvements further hook players.
- Admiration (weight 0.03): Admiration is expressed for the game's unique style, lore, and creative mechanics, which stand out in the genre. The carefully designed cards, strategic depth, and coherent world, along with the gorgeous art and soundtrack, earn high praise. Many consider it a criminally underrated and polished gem.
- Fun (weight 0.03): Fun stems from the synergistic deckbuilding, the strategic positioning of heroes, and the satisfying decision-making during exploration and combat. The game's failure loop feels intentional and fair, encouraging experimentation with new hero combinations. Players find the card gameplay and daily runs consistently enjoyable.
- Love (weight 0.02): Players express deep love for the game's deckbuilding, characters, and exploration mechanics, often after hundreds of hours. The ability to craft broken combos and the consistent quality across platforms solidify their affection. The art, music, and overall experience make it a favorite in the genre.
- Boredom (weight 0.02): Boredom sets in after extended play when only difficulty increases remain, and the game becomes repetitive due to limited heroes, maps, and bosses. The early hours feel slow and grindy, and once the three standard characters are leveled, there's little variety left. Experienced players find later runs monotonous and lacking novelty.
- Anger (weight 0.01): Anger is provoked by the fifth hero being locked behind a real-money purchase and the DLC price cut without compensation. A well-known game-breaking bug left unaddressed for years, crashes corrupting saves, and unwanted cards ruining builds frustrate players. The lack of regional pricing and poor translation add to the outrage.
- Mild disappointment (weight 0.01): Mild disappointment arises from bugs and balance issues, deckbuilding depth slightly inferior to genre leaders, and limited map themes. The locked DLC character and underwhelming sound design contribute to a feeling that the game falls short of its potential. The difficulty increase isn't always fun, and pages become useless after unlocking modifiers.
- Dissatisfaction (weight 0.01): Dissatisfaction comes from slow and generic progression, unbalanced fights, and an abrupt story ending. The ink/map system is unfun to some, and the inability to delete cards adds randomness. Publisher influence and inconsistent fonts also detract from the experience.
- Relief (weight 0.01): Relief is felt when the deck-size buff system reduces card-picking stress, early healing makes survival easier, and the developers fix crashes. The game working again after compatibility changes brings comfort. Players also feel relief upon finishing tedious achievements after long torment.
- Surprise (weight 0.01): Surprise is expressed that the game isn't more popular given its care and detail, and that it appeals to those typically uninterested in card games. Progress is shown without granting excessive extra powers, and map opening randomly grants attributes and artifacts, adding unexpected delight. The game's quality exceeds initial impressions.
- Delight (weight 0.01): Delight arises from the distinctive and fun map exploration, the huge variety of hero and card combinations, and a fresh take on familiar mechanics. The storybook-like, whimsical art and atmosphere enchant players, making each run interesting and challenging. The strategic depth and charm contribute to a captivating experience.
- Engagement (weight 0.01): Engagement is driven by progression that compels players to keep going, unlockables that maintain interest, and decision-making that hooks like Slay the Spire. Each new game feels very different, making it hard to put down. The engaging loop keeps players invested for many hours.}